ImaginaryWalker

Wondering what’s next…

[ImaginaryWalker @dianeconnect]

@CallieJElliott @MafiaMasshole I agree with you... but can I still ask you what you know about people getting hit by cares? Just curious. But JOK was not hit by a car.

[ImaginaryWalker @dianeconnect]

@LauraLiz79 @JenkinsonL79349 Who is Bella?

[ImaginaryWalker @dianeconnect]

@theLNGsuffering @JenkinsonL79349 Is that the 781 number w no name?

[ImaginaryWalker @dianeconnect]

@tanouryjr @DoctorTurtleboy No notes. Perfectly stated and exactly how I have felt watching these interviews. I got a bunch of hate for saying it on Reddit. No one is saying any of them is bad. I think they were incredible. But I feel there is a divide in the camp. Maybe they all just need space.

[ImaginaryWalker @dianeconnect]

@zonaeagle The police lied to Yanetti saying we have her hitting him on the Ring camera. Karen said she had no recollection so Yanetti - like a smart lawyer - said lets plead you out. Then someone gave them an anonymous tip that it happened in the house. They took a closer look....

[ImaginaryWalker @dianeconnect]

@DeeONea78536947 @DoctorTurtleboy But we know Colin was at the house. Allie McCabe said she arrived to pick him up at 12:10 am... now she was lying about the time but all the McAlberts agreed Colin was there that night.

[ImaginaryWalker @dianeconnect]

@BarstoolZ @Maxngman @TheInSneider @DoctorTurtleboy Not a single medical expert witness - including for the prosecution - said that John's injuries aligned to the injuries one receives from being hit by a car. That is science. So if the car didn't hit you must acquit.

[ImaginaryWalker @dianeconnect]

@realWaltM Actually the opposite of the OJ trial. The OJ trial they ignored the science and acquitted on emotion. In the Karen Read trial the jury ignored the emotion and acquitted on the science.

[ImaginaryWalker @dianeconnect]

@Katie93589071 @Free_Karen_Read His DNA would be on the car because he was consistently with the car. Where wasn't his DNA? On the tail light. Whose DNA on the clothing? The 3 or 4 unidentified men??? The debris field was not in line with science. Who would know there would be a debris field? A cop.

[ImaginaryWalker @dianeconnect]

@NursePat16066 @Exkma367Hickey @Bederowlaw Ummm... I am sure there will be an investigation and the science will explain why. I believe he was in the 1st row of coach behind the divider from 1st class. My guess is that divider help protect him. Science. The science proves Karen Read innocent.

[ImaginaryWalker @dianeconnect]

@stonekoldsoul Why are they predicting that? Who is juror 6?

[ImaginaryWalker @dianeconnect]

@TAVERASTHEBULLY @MarcoPo33093848 @armstrong_88795 @globalthinkerh The glass is not indicative of murder. If the glass was there and the physics of a car hit were there I could agree with you. If you explain for starts how he could be hit on the arm and land by the flagpole when physics don't work in that direction maybe we can talk.

[ImaginaryWalker @dianeconnect]

@TAVERASTHEBULLY @MarcoPo33093848 @armstrong_88795 @globalthinkerh A glass didn't kill John O'keefe. The fact there was a cocktail glass broken near John O'keefe means nothing. We don't know how it got there. Maybe he brought it into the house and when cleaning up they threw it at him when they threw him on lawn.

[ImaginaryWalker @dianeconnect]

@armstrong_88795 @globalthinkerh There is just glass. In fact it was proven that there was different types of glass that didn't even match on the scene. There is no picture of John holding a glass at 34 Fairview.

[ImaginaryWalker @dianeconnect]

@LizAnnFineArts @globalthinkerh I saw physical evidence of a dog bite. Evidence that a cop didn't see the taillight smashed out before the Sallyport. The snowplow guy who didn't see a body... What evidence of a car strike besides the planted tailight?

[ImaginaryWalker @dianeconnect]

@armstrong_88795 @globalthinkerh No knows if John was holding a glass in his hand. Assumptions are being made. John with the glass in his hand was outside the Waterfall. We have no idea if he was holding the glass at 34 Fairview.

[ImaginaryWalker @dianeconnect]

@erynnjbrady @DixieNormu95224 Karen Read's car was towed for evidence and she was being questioned by police - so of course she got a lawyer. Brian Higgins was not even being questioned as a witnessed.

[ImaginaryWalker @dianeconnect]

@NetteJeanne @DixieNormu95224 who is Berky?

[ImaginaryWalker @dianeconnect]

@mtorringaffney @LisaNIRL Anyone using critical thinking would realize that she wasn't saying he was over 7 feet tall but that she was saying he was 72 inches. It might have been awkward how it came out but her intent was clear. Even Brennan let it go. Not the gotcha moment you think.