Olivia
Online
The Dick and Dan Show
@dickanddanshow
The Dick and Dan show
We’re not here to tell you what to think — just to talk like men used to.
Joined September 2026
68 Following
10 Followers
235 Posts
"One Man. One Vote. One Warning."
Eleven jurors wanted a verdict. One man wouldn't give them one.
He voted his conscience. He held his ground when it would've been easier not to. And the moment that trial ended without the outcome people wanted — his past became a headline.
Ask yourself why. Not "was he right." Why does holding out come with a public reckoning? Because if jurors learn that voting against the crowd means your life gets dug up and broadcast, nobody serves on a jury with a clear conscience again. They serve to avoid becoming the story.
That's not justice. That's a warning shot to every future juror in America.
The Dick and Dan Show. Real talk, no mob.
"One Man. One Vote. One Warning."
Eleven jurors wanted a verdict. One man wouldn't give them one.
He voted his conscience. He held his ground when it would've been easier not to. And the moment that trial ended without the outcome people wanted — his past became a headline.
Ask yourself why. Not "was he right." Why does holding out come with a public reckoning? Because if jurors learn that voting against the crowd means your life gets dug up and broadcast, nobody serves on a jury with a clear conscience again. They serve to avoid becoming the story.
That's not justice. That's a warning shot to every future juror in America.
The Dick and Dan Show. Real talk, no mob.
The new warning to America.
"One Man. One Vote. One Warning."
Eleven jurors wanted a verdict. One man wouldn't give them one.
He voted his conscience. He held his ground when it would've been easier not to. And the moment that trial ended without the outcome people wanted — his past became a headline.
Ask yourself why. Not "was he right." Why does holding out come with a public reckoning? Because if jurors learn that voting against the crowd means your life gets dug up and broadcast, nobody serves on a jury with a clear conscience again. They serve to avoid becoming the story.
That's not justice. That's a warning shot to every future juror in America.
The Dick and Dan Show. Real talk, no mob.
"One Man. One Vote. One Warning."
Eleven jurors wanted a verdict. One man wouldn't give them one.
He voted his conscience. He held his ground when it would've been easier not to. And the moment that trial ended without the outcome people wanted — his past became a headline.
Ask yourself why. Not "was he right." Why does holding out come with a public reckoning? Because if jurors learn that voting against the crowd means your life gets dug up and broadcast, nobody serves on a jury with a clear conscience again. They serve to avoid becoming the story.
That's not justice. That's a warning shot to every future juror in America.
The Dick and Dan Show. Real talk, no mob.
No, the difficult question is why do people think that they can know exactly what she was thinking. No one can so people need to stop assuming, because assumptions are their mother of all screw ups. And this is the problem in this country is too many people think they have the right to assume. And they caused more problems because of their assumptions. Because this brave man that stood his ground is now being attacked because of assumptions.
"One Man. One Vote. One Warning."
Eleven jurors wanted a verdict. One man wouldn't give them one.
He voted his conscience. He held his ground when it would've been easier not to. And the moment that trial ended without the outcome people wanted — his past became a headline.
Ask yourself why. Not "was he right." Why does holding out come with a public reckoning? Because if jurors learn that voting against the crowd means your life gets dug up and broadcast, nobody serves on a jury with a clear conscience again. They serve to avoid becoming the story.
That's not justice. That's a warning shot to every future juror in America.
The Dick and Dan Show. Real talk, no mob.
"One Man. One Vote. One Warning."
Eleven jurors wanted a verdict. One man wouldn't give them one.
He voted his conscience. He held his ground when it would've been easier not to. And the moment that trial ended without the outcome people wanted — his past became a headline.
Ask yourself why. Not "was he right." Why does holding out come with a public reckoning? Because if jurors learn that voting against the crowd means your life gets dug up and broadcast, nobody serves on a jury with a clear conscience again. They serve to avoid becoming the story.
That's not justice. That's a warning shot to every future juror in America.
The Dick and Dan Show. Real talk, no mob.
"One Man. One Vote. One Warning."
Eleven jurors wanted a verdict. One man wouldn't give them one.
He voted his conscience. He held his ground when it would've been easier not to. And the moment that trial ended without the outcome people wanted — his past became a headline.
Ask yourself why. Not "was he right." Why does holding out come with a public reckoning? Because if jurors learn that voting against the crowd means your life gets dug up and broadcast, nobody serves on a jury with a clear conscience again. They serve to avoid becoming the story.
That's not justice. That's a warning shot to every future juror in America.
The Dick and Dan Show. Real talk, no mob.
"One Man. One Vote. One Warning."
Eleven jurors wanted a verdict. One man wouldn't give them one.
He voted his conscience. He held his ground when it would've been easier not to. And the moment that trial ended without the outcome people wanted — his past became a headline.
Ask yourself why. Not "was he right." Why does holding out come with a public reckoning? Because if jurors learn that voting against the crowd means your life gets dug up and broadcast, nobody serves on a jury with a clear conscience again. They serve to avoid becoming the story.
That's not justice. That's a warning shot to every future juror in America.
The Dick and Dan Show. Real talk, no mob.
"One Man. One Vote. One Warning."
Eleven jurors wanted a verdict. One man wouldn't give them one.
He voted his conscience. He held his ground when it would've been easier not to. And the moment that trial ended without the outcome people wanted — his past became a headline.
Ask yourself why. Not "was he right." Why does holding out come with a public reckoning? Because if jurors learn that voting against the crowd means your life gets dug up and broadcast, nobody serves on a jury with a clear conscience again. They serve to avoid becoming the story.
That's not justice. That's a warning shot to every future juror in America.
The Dick and Dan Show. Real talk, no mob.
See this is the problem. Everyone wants to right away accuse this man and call him a wife beater. He was he was never found guilty of domestic violence in a court of law. The criminal charge against him was completely dismissed. Until you’re convicted in a court law, you are innocent until proven guilty in this country. So people need to stop accusing this man of doing something he was never convicted of.
See this is the problem. Everyone wants to right away accuse this man and call him a wife beater. He was he was never found guilty of domestic violence in a court of law. The criminal charge against him was completely dismissed. Until you’re convicted in a court law, you are innocent until proven guilty in this country. So people need to stop accusing this man of doing something he was never convicted of. And you have a PhD, whatever school you went to must be handing out PhD’s like candy.
See this is the problem. Everyone wants to right away accuse this man and call him a wife beater. He was he was never found guilty of domestic violence in a court of law. The criminal charge against him was completely dismissed. Until you’re convicted in a court law, you are innocent until proven guilty in this country. So people need to stop accusing this man of doing something he was never convicted of.
See this is the problem. Everyone wants to right away accuse this man and call him a wife beater. He was he was never found guilty of domestic violence in a court of law. The criminal charge against him was completely dismissed. Until you’re convicted in a court law, you are innocent until proven guilty in this country. So people need to stop accusing this man of doing something he was never convicted of.
See this is the problem. Everyone wants to right away accuse this man and call him a wife beater. He was he was never found guilty of domestic violence in a court of law. The criminal charge against him was completely dismissed. Until you’re convicted in a court law, you are innocent until proven guilty in this country. So people need to stop accusing this man of doing something he was never convicted of.
@TDHBXG Yelled at from the rooftops sir!!
See this is the problem. Everyone wants to right away accuse this man and call him a wife beater. He was he was never found guilty of domestic violence in a court of law. The criminal charge against him was completely dismissed. Until you’re convicted in a court law, you are innocent until proven guilty in this country. So people need to stop accusing this man of doing something he was never convicted of.
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
241.6M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.2M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
89.9M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
83.8M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.3M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.2M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.8M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.2M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers