Jorge Dighero

[Jorge Dighero @DigheroJorge]

Rest in peace, Charlie.
Your legacy will continue to live on with all of us. We are holding your family in our thoughts and prayers during this difficult time. Thank you for showing the world what it means to live with integrity, strong values, and unwavering morals. You were not only a good person but also an example of decency and kindness. Your presence will be deeply missed, but your spirit and impact will remain with us always.

[Jorge Dighero @DigheroJorge]

@wizardosmosis @girdley That first grade math finally paid off 🤣

[Jorge Dighero @DigheroJorge]

@DJSnM The saddest thing is to think that somewhere in the newsroom someone thought about that headline and even worse a news director said yes, let’s go with that…..

[Jorge Dighero @DigheroJorge]

@AlexisVVV42 @ZacksJerryRig @elonmusk You couldn’t argue the point so you went digging through my profile to mock me for honoring a man who was assassinated. “Lol. Enough said” — yeah, it really is. About you

[Jorge Dighero @DigheroJorge]

@fiveyearwaruk @ZacksJerryRig @elonmusk What’s the nonsense exactly? “Nonsense” and “rightly criticised” aren’t arguments they’re conclusions. Spell out what’s actually wrong with the point and we can have a real conversation.

[Jorge Dighero @DigheroJorge]

That’s actually true of every space image ever published — Hubble, JWST, NASA’s Mars rovers. None of them show what your eyes would actually perceive. They’re processed, stacked, and often shifted into wavelengths we can’t even see. If that’s the bar, we’d have no space imagery at all.

[Jorge Dighero @DigheroJorge]

Llevo más de 30 años en la industria del broadcasting trabajando directamente con sensores de imagen, cámaras de producción y flujos de captura, así que te respondo con datos:
• Rango dinámico: cámaras como la ARRI Alexa 35 capturan ~17 stops; el ojo humano en una sola fijación, ~10-14.
• Espectro: los sensores CCD/CMOS detectan IR y UV, invisibles al ojo.
• Sensibilidad: la astrofotografía existe porque captamos fotones que el ojo jamás vería.
• Resolución temporal: cámaras de alta velocidad registran eventos por debajo del umbral de fusión del ojo.
Y ojo: estás mezclando dos cosas. Lo que un sensor CAPTA es física. Lo que la IA INFIERE después es algoritmo. Que un modelo alucine no cambia lo que el silicio detectó.

[Jorge Dighero @DigheroJorge]

@ZacksJerryRig @elonmusk Your level of hate toward Elon is on another level, buddy. The whole point is to show that car see way beyond what your eyes can perceive. I used to enjoy your content, but your completely irrational hate toward Elon makes following your stories unbearable.

[Jorge Dighero @DigheroJorge]

Most people thinking that “camera-only FSD is impossible” have no idea this is what Tesla is actually doing.
Image 1 isn’t what the camera captured. It’s what your eyes would perceive from those photons.
Image 2 is what the sensor actually recorded reconstructed from the raw photon count, not compressed through human visual perception.
I can tell you: the data on the right was always there. Human vision throws most of it away. AI doesn’t have to.
The entire “cameras can’t see in glare or at night” argument is built on the assumption that machine vision is bounded by what humans can see. It isn’t. And it never was.
This is what the FSD debate should actually be about — but almost no one talking about it knows this is happening.

[Jorge Dighero @DigheroJorge]

@karpathy I can wait to see what you do with it!!!!

[Jorge Dighero @DigheroJorge]

OpenClaw Partners with VirusTotal for Skill Security https://t.co/5RH2QGUKGY via @openclaw

[Jorge Dighero @DigheroJorge]

@TansuYegen This is wildly misleading! At that scale, each “dot” (satellite) would be ~500 km in diameter, bigger than some cities!
Most satellites are just 3-5 meters across. That’s 99.999% smaller than shown. Scales matters in this case🚀🌍 #SpaceFacts #ScaleFail

[Jorge Dighero @DigheroJorge]

@todayyearsold Wait……. What!!!!!! 🤯

[Jorge Dighero @DigheroJorge]

An absolute Master class in Common Sense.

[Nayib Bukele @nayibbukele]

A journalist asks about human rights.

[Jorge Dighero @DigheroJorge]

@TansuYegen Really cool as a demo, but what is the actual point of this in a car.
From the manufacturing side the amount of things that can go wrong there with time is pretty high.

[Jorge Dighero @DigheroJorge]

@ProfBrianCox I’ve been waiting years for you to come to South Florida and I finally got my ticket! Really looking forward to what I know will be an extraordinary show. Your work has inspired me for so long, and I can’t wait to experience it live.

[Jorge Dighero @DigheroJorge]

As a father of a 4-year-old and a Catholic who believes in traditional family values, I’m absolutely LIVID.
My little boy was watching “Jurassic World: Camp Cretaceous” on Netflix (rated TV-PG, supposedly safe for kids) when suddenly two teenage girls share a full-on romantic kiss, and the entire camp cheers and celebrates them “being a couple.”
This isn’t some background blink-and-you-miss-it moment. It’s a deliberate, spotlighted gay romance scene in a children’s cartoon about DINOSAURS.
I have zero issue with what consenting adults do in their private lives. I have gay friends I love and respect. But shoving sexual orientation and romantic relationships (any kind, gay or straight) into shows aimed at little kids is grotesque, predatory grooming-by-stealth.
@netflix is intentionally bypassing parents, exploiting the trust we place in ratings, and injecting adult ideology into children who just want to watch dinosaurs. This is not “representation.” This is ideological colonization of childhood.
STOP sexualizing our kids.
STOP lying with your ratings.
STOP using cartoons to push agendas.
Parents, check what your children are watching. Netflix no longer deserves your trust.
#ProtectChildhood #NetflixGrooming #ParentsBeware #ElonMusk @elonmusk

[Jorge Dighero @DigheroJorge]

I respect that everyone’s experience can differ, but I wanted to share my own after driving 1,850 miles on FSD v14.1 and v14.2. I’ve used it in city streets, highways, heavy rain, night driving, and mixed conditions, and I honestly find it drives more smoothly and predictably than I do most of the time. The decision-making, lane choices, gap judgment, and overall composure of the system have been outstanding in my daily use.
I’ve been driving for roughly 40 years across multiple countries and many different cars, and I’ve never once hallucinated a solid wall in the road or had any of the dramatic failures that sometimes make the headlines. Obviously edge cases exist (they do for human drivers too), but in real-world, day-to-day driving, the gap between FSD’s current performance and what most of us actually achieve behind the wheel is already very impressive in my experience.
I fully trust the system for the kind of trips I do regularly not because it’s perfect, but because it has proven consistently excellent in the conditions I actually encounter.