john

[The Nobel Prize @NobelPrize]

Irish playwright, author, critic and socialist George Bernard Shaw is perhaps best known for his play, ‘Pygmalion’.

[Philosophy Of Physics @PhilosophyOfPhy]

In 1931, Niels Bohr described James Clerk Maxwell’s electromagnetic theory as being of “fundamental importance to the work of every physicist.”

Maxwell’s theory also exposed the problem that helped lead Bohr toward the quantum atom.

An electron orbiting a nucleus is an accelerating charge. According to classical electrodynamics, it should radiate energy and spiral into the nucleus, making Rutherford’s atom unstable.

Bohr’s 1913 model introduced stationary states in which electrons do not radiate, with light emitted or absorbed only during transitions between energy levels.

Maxwell’s theory did not solve the atomic problem.

It showed Bohr exactly where classical physics had reached its limit.

He was an incredible.

[Handre @Handre]

Envy needs an ideology, and socialism has always been happy to provide one. Mises wrote a whole book about this in 1956, The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality, and the diagnosis holds up: people who resent the outcomes of voluntary exchange will always search for a doctrine that transforms their resentment into virtue. The woke left found theirs.

Notice what wokeism and socialism share at the root. Both start from the premise that unequal outcomes prove injustice. You earned more than your neighbor? Exploitation. One group outperforms another in median income? Systemic oppression. Neither doctrine ever asks whether people made different choices, took different risks, or produced different value for others. Asking that question would ruin everything, because the entire project depends on assigning blame rather than understanding prices, profit, and loss.

Once you accept that unequal outcomes equal injustice, you need a corrector. Someone powerful. Someone with the authority to override contracts, seize property, and redistribute according to a moral hierarchy the planners themselves define. That job description has exactly one applicant: the state. This is why the woke activist and the socialist always arrive at the same policy desk, demanding rent control in New York, wealth taxes in Sacramento, hiring quotas in every HR department from Seattle to Brussels.

Marcuse and the Frankfurt School figured out decades ago that the Western worker refused to play his assigned role as revolutionary. He got rich instead. Capitalism handed him a car, a house, and air conditioning, and he stopped listening to men promising utopia through expropriation. The revolutionaries needed a new client base. Class became identity, but the machinery stayed identical: oppressor and oppressed, guilt and grievance, revolution and rule.

The love affair with socialism, then, follows logically. Wokeism supplies the moral demand for coercion; socialism supplies the economic apparatus of coercion. Neither can survive in a world of private property and voluntary exchange, because in that world you rise by serving customers, not by capturing committees. Venezuela ran this experiment from 1999 onward. The grocery shelves reported the results.

[Merlow @exeMerlow]

Richard Feynman stood at a Cornell blackboard in 1964 and explained the problem every AI lab is fighting in 2026. The BBC filmed it. Almost nobody watches it.

The lecture is about why nature only answers in mathematics. Every team forcing language models to reason is hitting the wall he mapped 62 years ago.

He was 46. The Nobel Prize came 11 months later. The footage survived on film reels and now sits free on YouTube with fewer views than a keyboard unboxing.

Watch the blackboard section near the middle. He takes 1 of Kepler's laws and rebuilds it from nothing, with notation a 12-year-old can follow.

No slides. No jargon. 1 piece of chalk.

An ML engineer I know paused it 4 times and made his whole team watch it before standup.

You're 62 years late. The lecture is still free.

[⚔️ Majesty Pandora ⚔️ @MajestyPandora_]

Cómo de capaz vas a ser hoy?

[Teddy - PolyBackTest.com @Bitcoin_Teddy]

Elon Musk thinks the entire education system is built on a broken assumption.

That every student should learn the same thing. At the same speed. In the same order. At the same time.

Musk: “Everyone goes through from like 5th grade to 6th grade to 7th grade like it’s an assembly line. But people are not objects on an assembly line.”

The model was designed for a factory economy. Standardized inputs. Predictable outputs.

That economy is gone. The assembly line is gone.

But the education system still runs on its logic.

A student who masters algebra in two weeks sits through eight more weeks because the calendar says so. A student who struggles gets dragged forward because the schedule doesn’t wait.

Neither is being served. Both are being processed.

Musk: “Allow people to progress at the fastest pace that they can or are interested in, in each subject.”

AI doesn’t teach a classroom. It teaches a student.

One at a time. Every time.

It skips what a student already knows. It finds where they’re stuck and approaches it from a different angle.

It adjusts in real time. Not at the end of a semester when the damage is already done.

A student obsessed with basketball learns fractions through shooting percentages. A student who builds in Minecraft learns geometry through architecture.

The subject doesn’t change. The entry point does.

No teacher with thirty students can do this. Not because they lack skill.

Because the math doesn’t work.

AI doesn’t have that constraint.

Musk: “You do not need to tell your kid to play video games. They will play video games on autopilot all day. So if you can make it interactive and engaging, then you can make education far more compelling.”

The brain isn’t broken. The format is.

Kids learn complex systems and strategic thinking for hours voluntarily. Then walk into a classroom and can’t focus for twenty minutes.

That’s not a discipline problem. That’s a design problem.

Musk: “A university education is often unnecessary. You probably learn the vast majority of what you’re going to learn there in the first two years. And most of it is from your classmates.”

Four years. Six figures of debt.

And the real value comes from the people sitting next to you. Not the institution charging you.

The degree doesn’t certify knowledge. It certifies endurance.

Musk: “If the goal is to start a company, I would say no point in finishing college.”

The system was built to train employees. If you’re not trying to be one, it has nothing left to offer you.

Every lecture. Every textbook. Every curriculum. Now available instantly. Personalized to any learner. Adapted to any pace.

The question isn’t whether the old model survives.

It’s how long we keep forcing students through it while the replacement already exists.

[Ajit kumar @ajitcodes]

Anthropic just released a 4-hour course to getting a $500k AI engineering job:

00:15 - The right way to prompt Claude
33:21 - What makes Claude act dumber on your code
01:33:39 - How Anthropic use Claude every day
02:50:56 - The fix that makes Claude way smarter This

4-hour Anthropic free course replaces about 10 paid engineering courses.

Watch it today, then read the step-by-step guide on building loops below.

[john @dimitrin123]

@sofiarain542 you're beauty 😊

[john @dimitrin123]

@AvaSol144 Have you heard of the Enneagram dear? We definitely seem to be the same type--perhaps the exact same: As in we're not just both 4s in that model, but probably also both Sexual 4s with a 5 wing, if that makes sense! 😛✌️🙏✨🌸

[john @dimitrin123]

@AvaSol144 "life is born only from the spark of opposites" -- Carl Jung

[john @dimitrin123]

@AvaSol144 Women = yin. It is the gift of receiving and of being receptive to the state, condition or expressiveness of the other.

As a mother, it is nurturing, and perceives the developmental as well as immediate needs of the infant. 👶🐣

[Ava Sol 💃🌞❤️‍🔥 @AvaSol144]

Woman/the feminine energy in all/intuition is naturally connected to Source (Divine Intelligence and Divine Love) - we only need to remember.

Video featuring my green tea with jasmine and an unsuspecting banana, to illustrate my personal explorations into the collective subconscious 🧜‍♀️🌊

[john @dimitrin123]

@AvaSol144 Funnily enough, I just finished watching a short YouTube video about Osho. Apparently he rose to prominence partially upon the publication of a book in which he describes sexuality as something to be embraced as vital part of one's spiritual evolution.. 🌸😊🙏

[john @dimitrin123]

@AvaSol144 Yes well when I encounter a woman who I'm attracted to and who emits a certain combination of "grace with confidence", or "confidence with grace", well, then my natural urge is to.. 🙈🙏✨

[Deep Psychology @DeepPsycho_HQ]

The hidden brain mechanism that explains

Why late boomers often outshine those who succeed early.

- Neuroscience has shown that after age 35, the brain moves from exploration mode to exploitation mode. People who welcome this shift frequently achieve their greatest success later in life.

- Early success tends to come from speed and youthful energy. Later success comes from wisdom, deep concentration, and strategic patience – benefits that only time can offer.

- Most people feel anxious when they reach 30 or 40, feeling “behind.” They compare themselves to younger versions and burn out trying to compete in the wrong game.

- The smart ones change their approach. They stop chasing every opportunity and start mastering a few high value ones. They exchange speed for precision.

- Your 40s and beyond can be your most powerful chapter if you understand this natural brain transition instead of resisting it.

[john @dimitrin123]

@ashebytes 😊🌸👍

[ashe @ashebytes]

the frontier of tech is actually wrangling your consciousness back from the algorithms and making them work for you as you ascend into a radiant being of creation, love, & light

[Berlina • FINDOM👑 @Deluxe1_01]

🔥 “Bikini rosa. Tu cuenta vacía💸
RT si entiendes el precio del respeto.”🐕
#Berlina
#BizumYa
#DiosaBerlina
#TributoBerlina
#sumisofinanciero
#BizumObligatorio

[john @dimitrin123]

@AvaSol144 I'm a student of the "divine feminine", in other words! Jeje.

Did you know the word "philosophy" itself refers to someone who literally loves Sophia--the Goddess of wisdom?? 🙏🙏😊

[john @dimitrin123]

@AvaSol144 Hi there 👋 I like your way of thinking. I'm a 39 year male but consider myself an empath, and share many of the same thoughts and preoccupations that you seem to have 🙏😊