DingoKang

Individual investor, generalist.

[DingoKang @DingoKang]

@NotSure61154 @BlazeTV @SteveDeaceShow The intensity of pushback was so tepid before the war/in the early days of the war. Take a look at his 4/21 show for example - he thought the war was going well!

[DingoKang @DingoKang]

@JoshYoung The fattest pitches are in the 20%.

[DingoKang @DingoKang]

@mercoglianos @Rory_Johnston Curious that there isn't VLCCs going to west of panama canal for pickup/lightering from panamax shuttling oil from Gulf Coast. More complicated, but that would seem to be a faster route to Asia.

[DingoKang @DingoKang]

@SteveDeaceShow @theblaze How can you entertain Woods comments on US hegemony without thinking in terms of ability, cost/benefit, and constraints?? Idealism vs realism. Sorry to be harsh but Woods isn't too smart by half, rather you guys are incredibly dense.

[DingoKang @DingoKang]

@Big_Orrin Orrin sometimes you annoy me, but 100% agreement on this take.

[DingoKang @DingoKang]

@BIGDATAPOLL @RepThomasMassie @EdGallrein IMO this is a harbinger for the GOP at large. Maybe not every Primary this cycle, e.g. doubt Fishback wins the primary, but this is the trend. My question is whether the Gallrein-esq voters will support Massie-esq candidates in the General. @SteveDeaceShow

[DingoKang @DingoKang]

@KYRRadio Zach you're going to love WA's market-based sourcing (tax) rules for that new tax. 😉 But at least you'll save on your personal account by moving.

[DingoKang @DingoKang]

@Geo_papic I think Iran wants oil to $150 minimum before they cut a deal, but then does that simultaneously make it hard for Trump to declare victory? Seems like a vicious cycle.

[DingoKang @DingoKang]

@SheDrills I don't think the 25% of Trump voters that disapprove of the war would vote for Rubio even if it means Newsom in the WH.

IMO Vance is the only real candidate that can unite the party, but 2028 odds are so bad it would be a waste. Let Rubio blow it and try again in 2032.

[DingoKang @DingoKang]

@JesseKellyDC But how many ppl no longer ID as republican because of Epstein + war? @Peoples_Pundit

[DingoKang @DingoKang]

@SteveDeaceShow I don't believe you. You put everything on motives to avoid talking merits. Because you know you will get hosed on the merits.

[DingoKang @DingoKang]

@barnes_law All because the donors won't go for mandatory e-verify.

[DingoKang @DingoKang]

@robin_j_brooks @paulkrugman Let me guess: when Crude blows past $150 you're going to blame speculators and say it "should" trade at $100.

[DingoKang @DingoKang]

@TheChiefNerd Trump values personal loyalty wayyyy more than winning on ANY political issue. Even apart from long term political outcomes it creates tactical nightmares to manage.

[DingoKang @DingoKang]

@joshyoung @marklevinshow Was Levin also this positive days after the Iraq invasion? Not always on Tucker's side, but I think he's 100% on point that neocon/neolib factions pushing FP in the past (Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya) should play zero part in FP going forward. Proven failures plain and simple

[DingoKang @DingoKang]

@hcapinvesting Offshore is seen as more speculative due to the inherent leverage. But idk, a washout may benefit them in long run. Consolidation, and large operators rethinking assumptions regarding shale being lower margin but lower risk vs offshore.

[DingoKang @DingoKang]

@The_Idol_Killer 2/2 ultimately attributable to God (ie wrath) not Satan/death? This seems to be lurking if not explicit.
I don’t see this as consistent with a supernatural view of “rulers” in 1 Cor 2:8 (Heiser). B/c otherwise in hindsight the rulers would be indifferent, if Wrath was the block.

[DingoKang @DingoKang]

@The_Idol_Killer 1/2 PSA and non-PSA agree Jesus had to die for our redemption, correct? (Luke 22:42) Thus, ultimately is the dispute over whether satan/death had an advantage concerning our redemption which could not otherwise be overcome? In other words on PSA the block to redemption must be...

[DingoKang @DingoKang]

@SteveDeaceShow @theblaze Your take isn't bad bc it's wrong. It's bad bc it's a non-responsive strawman. I mean Cooper basically predicts your response, and says two guys can be bad at the same time. I can't understand why you reach so hard, seems esp true when it comes to Tucker.