The Daily Groyper is very upset about Israeli influence. The Daily Groyper has reported about Turkish and Qatari influence 0 times in the past 9 months, despite previously doing so rather consistently.
What happened?
Mark Levin got locked out of his AOL email and had already made fun of himself for still using it. You had to pile on with the dial-up, landline, and Buddy List jokes. It wasn’t funny or a joke or the first time. It came off as mean and petty and you damn well know it. You are embarrassed and that’s why you are lashing out. Harmeet Dhillon called the conduct condescending to older Americans. Hardly think she is a neocon. You answered by asking whether Dhillon would cry if he made fun of VCRs. Which was yet again condescending and rude.
“Boomer brigade”
“Neocon”
What are you a child? You need to telegraph to your team to take your side when you act like an arrogant prick? Does it make you feel better about yourself? Does it make some kind of a policy argument?
You always turn a comment about your conduct into a fight between factions on the right.
Everyone who doesn’t subscribe to your views is not in fact a neocon. You know that because you are well versed in what the word neocon actually means. You are also well versed in Marxist rhetoric and changing the definitions of words to serve your own interests, so you know that continuously calling every single person who doesn’t agree with you a neocon is a leftist tactic. How do you know that so well? Because you have a whole podcast dedicated to exposing this kind of behavior on the left.
Why don’t you take your own advice.
Marc also served one of the greatest senators of all time, Jesse Helms. You don’t mention that. I worked for Reagan for 8 years. What’s with the bullsh*t. We back the president in Iran. Do you?
Leaders can be assessed by the composition of their opponents.
For @JDVance, his most fierce critics are washed-up Bush era Boomer retreads who pine for an America that’s constantly intervening overseas, and usually at the behest of foreign powers.
That’s not America First!
After the midterm wipeout, divisive blame-gaming erupted on the Right. One particularly bitter divide was over supposed “neocon” interventionism and the Iran war.
But who are—or were—the neocons, and what is neoconservatism?
https://t.co/IuJZRjUvdw
I don't know how many cabinet members and White House staff members have been forceed to live on military bases due to threats by the Islamist Nazi regime in Tehran, but that would be enough for me to take this terrorist regime out. Just saying.
It is so pathetic watching these grifters and isolationists in their mid- to -late 50s going on about boomers, lol! Substance is not their strong point, but neither is sloganeering.
Britannica on Mao's Four Olds ... sounds like many of the Woke Reich miscreants around here!
"The term "Four Olds" refers to a campaign during China's Cultural Revolution (1966–76) that targeted "old ideas, customs, culture, and habits of mind." Launched by Mao Zedong and his supporters, including the Red Guards, this movement aimed to dismantle traditional Chinese values and replace them with Maoist ideology. The campaign led to widespread destruction of cultural artifacts, persecution of intellectuals and elders, and significant social upheaval. This was part of Mao's broader goal to revolutionize China's superstructure and ensure his successors remained loyal to his thinking."
The most consistently insufferable and irrelevant neo con accounts on here are now having a full blown tantrum because I made a mild joke about AOL. That’s not even an exaggeration. That’s actually what they’re angry about. Click through the QTs. There isn’t some horrible thing at the end of it that I’m trying to paper over. Literally a joke about AOL, directed at Mark Levin not some random old granny (although maybe he qualifies, admittedly).
NEW: JD Vance is getting hammered by GOP hawks over his position on Iran. His allies say bring it on.
“These people are doing the lord’s work,” one person close to Vance tells Playbook.
The strategy: Turn attacks from BOTH parties into an anti-establishment brand.
It seems like JD is defined by his maneuvers.
How will he position himself for this? How can he change his beliefs on that? How can he keep his base?
What I don’t hear very often is what does he actually believe in?
Look at that - @JDVance's groyper pollster loves @KevinRobertsTX's cry for more populist-nationalist cowbell!
Not exactly beating the rap, @Heritage...
https://t.co/XhQtaXYjai
Somebody get Pedo the psychiatric help he desperately needs. He’s calling out for help.
When is your court date for those sexual molestation cases again? Will you be settling them alto coverup your behavior or fighting them in open court?
I take back everything I’ve said about the Iran War.
If Iran has the power to hack Mark Levin’s AOL account, then every Iranian man, woman and child must be killed.
They planted this idiotic story with you and you go along. Very professional. That’s what passes for journalism.
So, everybody, do not question JD’s position on Iran! You’ll turn him into Superman! So says Politico and TPUSA. Got it.
NEW: JD Vance is getting hammered by GOP hawks over his position on Iran. His allies say bring it on.
“These people are doing the lord’s work,” one person close to Vance tells Playbook.
The strategy: Turn attacks from BOTH parties into an anti-establishment brand.
This guy is endlessly giving aid and comfort to the enemy, spewing propaganda and lies, and undermining our armed forces and President.
I’ll drop him. 10 days of his imbecility is enough. I feel sorry for his family. Audios moron.
One can love America, hate the Iranian regime, and hope for its destruction, while also not attacking the President and his decisions all summer leading up to the election like Mark did. And those who misled the President with rosier than reality visions of the outcomes helped hand deliver an electrical majority that will now weaponize Congress to constantly attack and try to unwind the many victories and wins the President has delivered on.
The worst part of it is that Levin and others refuse to acknowledge that even if getting their way initially was the right call, it had significant political downsides in the election.
Just be honest Mark, we can otherwise accept that the initial choice was difficult and could have been the right call with the information the President had in front of him.
Are you enjoying the greatest political show on earth???
Yesterday, Netanyahu stood in the Knesset and did what Israel's center-left and its media cheerleaders refuse to do. He read out, word for word, what the leaders of the two anti-Israel Arab political parties they started to govern with have said.
Ra'am MK Walid Taha: "The Palestinians, unlike the Jews, are the owners of this land. With the help of Allah, this occupation will be set aside."
Ra'am chairman Mansour Abbas: "The Jews have no rights on the Temple Mount. The Jews have no rights at the Western Wall. The Jews have no rights in Jerusalem. The Jews are invaders in this land."
Ra'am MK Walid al-Huashla: "The Jews are settlers in Tel Aviv." Not in Judea and Samaria. In Tel Aviv.
And Abbas in 2015, dreaming of a "democratic caliphate," Palestine from the sea to the river, on the ruins of Israel.
Eisenkot's response? He called the speech "delusional, divisive, hate-filled and shameful."
Quoting the people you want as coalition partners is divisive? Reminding Israelis, three years after October 7th, that there are MKs sitting in Israel’s parliament who call Hamas a charitable organization is shameful?
Here's what's actually divisive. Eisenkot, Bennett, Lapid, Liberman and Golan are governing Israel fully dependent upon the votes of parties that walk out of Parliament when Israel's national anthem is sung, support Hamas, and support the destruction of the Jewish state.
Under Section 7A of Basic Law: The Knesset, lists like these should never have been allowed to run. Our political activist Supreme Court let them in anyway, and now the center-left is empowering them in running our country, the one they want to destroy.
That's the red-green alliance in action, inside our own parliament.
And the hypocrisy takes your breath away.
For three years these same leaders screamed that Netanyahu was in bed with Qatar and propping up Hamas. Now, in order to topple Netanyahu, they're the ones sitting down with those who call Hamas a charity organization. They aren't just being divisive. They're endangering our lives.
But don't despair. More Israelis are waking up every day to who these leaders really are and how dangerous their actions are to our lives. October 7th opened eyes, and this election is opening them wider. The wake-up is in hyper mode. Many were convinced by slick election campaigns and mainstream media to vote for these center-left parties to deal with the Ultra-Ortgodix draft issue, but as one of the leaders of the political left protest movement admitted last night to Yinon Magal, they have no problem pushing off the ultra-orthodox draft issue for four years to topple Netanyahu. They just hid that message during the election campaign.
So hold on to your seats, because it will be a bumpy ride. Strengthen your faith. These are redemptive times, and we will win in the end, overcoming our jihadi enemies and our internal challenges.
By the way, with this all, Eizenkot has still not succeeded in making a government, and Netanyahu is still Prime Minister.
Am Yisrael Chai!!!