You guys would shoot yourselves in the foot before admitting that Hoyoverse profits off the objectification of women and it's getting reaaalllyyyy annoying
The men in the comments?? A woman shares how her boyfriend got violent because she said NO to sex while on her PERIOD and instead of horror at a man who reacts to ‘no’ with physical assault, a bunch of y’all are asking: ‘Why did she even go there knowing he wants sex?’ ‘Why be in a relationship if you don’t want sex?’ L🤢
Straight-up rape-apologist logic. Like how are you more worried about a man’s blue balls than a woman getting beaten for setting a boundary. The priority isn’t her safety it’s making sure men never have to hear ‘no’ without flipping out.
This proves the exact point that men see relationships as a sex contract where refusal is seen as betrayal or provocation. Disgusting 🤢
⚠️PLEASE PLEASE RETWEET THE HELL OUT OF THIS KITTEN ABUSER
🚨 BEN MURKIN, ELY
⚠️KNOW HIS FACE⚠️
A sadistic animal abuser has avoided prison after inflicting catastrophic injuries on a kitten after throwing it at a wall, a door and down the stairs.
Ben Murkin, of Mill Lane, Fordham, Ely, appeared at Cambridge Crown Court on March 6 to be sentenced in a prosecution brought forward by the RSPCA.
On March 6, 2024, a veterinary practice was contacted by a family member who said Murkin's cat Whisper had fallen and was struggling to breathe.
By the time they arrived at the practice with Whisper, the kitten had already passed away after being in immense pain and suffering.
Whisper's death was reported to the RSPCA after concerns about the injuries.
An independent post mortem found that Whisper had suffered injuries including a bruised head, a left eye haemorrhage, reddening and bruising of the tail area, and multiple injuries to limbs, consistent with a strong human grip.
Murkin claimed the injuries occurred when he was carrying out CPR.
The post mortem also found evidence of current and old rib fractures and a fracture on the lumber vertebrae.
He had also ignored advice from the bet to bring the cat back on two occasions.
These included after bringing in the kitten for limping after a supposed fall in December 2023 and in February 2024 after treatment for a fractured tooth and red gums.
Some of the specific acts of cruelty detailed in court included kicking Whisper against a wall, picking her up by the tail and throwing her down the stairs, and throwing Whisper against the door.
The expert vet concluded in their report: “It is my expert opinion that clearly Whisper suffered as a result of the injuries she sustained however they were caused.
She sustained multiple and severe injuries both to her lip and upper canine, to her ribs on the right hand side and then to her face, chest and abdomen in the final incident.
“All of these will have caused her to suffer pain and distress. The final set of injuries the duration of the suffering will only have lasted as long as she remained conscious which is likely to have been a short period of time.
“It is my expert opinion that the injuries sustained by Whisper were the result of deliberate and intentional trauma inflicted upon her by a person with the intention of her causing her serious harm and suffering.”
The court heard he got Whisper with his girlfriend as emotional support as he was lonely. When the relationship ended, he started to resent the cat. The judge described Murkin's actions as an "extraordinary response".
The judge noted this had been "astonishing cruelty to an animal" and said Murkin had committed other acts of physical violence on the cat.
The offence was placed in the highest category because the injuries were "prolonged and repeated, inflicted with significant force, and resulted in death".
Murkin had pleaded guilty to two counts of causing unnecessary suffering to Whisper by inflicting trauma causing injury and for failing to provide prompt veterinary treatment, in respect of the injury to the cat’s gums and fractured canine tooth.
He was given a 22-month prison sentenced that has been suspended for 18 months.
He has been ordered to carry out 240 hours of unpaid work and 20 Rehabilitation Activity Requirement days.
He has been banned for keeping all animals for life and was ordered to pay £500 court costs and £187 victim surcharge.
RSPCA Inspector Emily Astillberry said: "The actions in this case were of astonishing cruelty to a defenceless animal. It is heart-breaking to hear what Whisper - this small ragdoll kitten - had to endure such cruel and sustained suffering. She was still so young when she died and had to endure such pain and suffering during this short life.”
“Underage girls testing positive for pregnancy” you mean CHILDREN who are being RAPED. Nothing is being done to terminate these pregnancies either. They are going to be forced to give birth to their rapists’s children and who knows what will happen to them or the babies after. These girls are still children themselves and are being separated from their parents so they can be violated repeatedly by grown men. Now they will be forced to become mothers and undergo even more torture at this undisclosed location.
How is this making America great? How is this keeping our country safe? The real rapists and criminals are ICE. How is this any different from what Epstein was doing?
We cannot stop fighting until ICE is dismantled and these monsters are held accountable for the torture they are inflicting upon these innocent people.
The UK Is Now a “Country of Concern” for Trans People. That Should Alarm Everyone.
Something extraordinary has happened, and it has barely been absorbed by the public.
The United Kingdom has been formally criticised by the Council of Europe for an “appalling rise in transphobia and toxic anti-trans discourse” and placed alongside countries such as Poland, Hungary, Turkey and Russia as a country of concern for LGBTQIA+ people. This is not the assessment of activists on social media. It is the conclusion of Europe’s leading human rights body.
The Council of Europe’s resolution, debated and adopted in January, did not emerge from nowhere. It followed years of escalating hostile rhetoric in UK politics, media and public life, particularly aimed at trans people. British delegates attempted to dilute the findings during the debate and failed. The rebuke stood.
Adam Long of the National LGBT Federation described the situation plainly. The rise in anti-trans discourse in the UK is no longer marginal. It is visible, sustained and harmful. The Council’s decision reflects a recognition that this rhetoric is producing real-world consequences.
Ireland’s Transgender Equality Network chair, Sara Phillips, was equally clear. The narratives being pushed do not merely debate policy. They deny the existence of trans people, undermine their rights and dehumanise them. These campaigns do not stop at trans communities. They bleed into attacks on wider LGBTQIA+ equality, reproductive rights and the rights of women and children.
This is how human rights erosion works. It never announces itself as oppression. It frames itself as “common sense”, “concern” or “balance”. But the outcomes are measurable. Increased hate speech. Increased harassment. Increased violence. Increased fear.
That is why the Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention issued a red-flag alert for the UK in relation to anti-trans and anti-intersex rights. A red flag is not an accusation of genocide. It is an early warning system. It identifies patterns that historically precede mass rights violations: scapegoating, dehumanisation, moral panic, institutional hostility and the narrowing of legal protections.
The Lemkin Institute’s analysis highlights how trans people in the UK are increasingly framed as threats rather than citizens. Language matters. When pronouns are stripped in reporting, when identity is treated as ideology, when existence is debated rather than protected, the groundwork for exclusion is laid.
What makes this particularly disturbing is the comparison the Council of Europe itself draws. Poland’s so-called “LGBT-free zones”. Hungary’s ban on LGBTQ+ representation to minors. Turkey’s systematic rollbacks of queer rights. These are not fringe regimes. They are cautionary examples of how quickly a democracy can slide when minorities are treated as disposable.
The UK now appears in that conversation.
This is not about silencing disagreement. It is about recognising when disagreement turns into organised hostility backed by institutions. Human rights law exists precisely to protect minorities when they become politically inconvenient.
The Council of Europe was explicit. States have a duty to counter misleading narratives, increase public understanding and actively promote equality. Neutrality in the face of dehumanisation is not neutrality. It is complicity.
What happens next matters. Countries can change course. They can correct. They can choose dignity over panic. But pretending this condemnation does not exist will not make it go away.
When international human rights bodies raise alarms, history shows it is wise to listen early rather than explain later.
Shame on @UKLabour@Keir_Starmer@wesstreeting
—
Sources
Council of Europe Resolution on rising anti-trans hostility
GCN reporting on the UK as a “country of concern”
https://t.co/ocGXcG3kL8
Lemkin Institute Red Flag Alert on anti-trans and intersex rights in the UK
https://t.co/j2z14vRirQ