"Properly Read", their own words, it's very true and applies to their interpretation of evidence as well. And remember, their "science books" have to be corrected frequently, even by them.
This Bonaventure himself does, offering various proofs of the existence of God: defective being implies perfect being, he argues, dependent being implies independent being, mobile being implies immobile being, and so on. These proofs he interprets, in Platonic manner, as being mere stimuli to bring to full consciousness a knowledge of Godβs existence that is implanted by nature in the human mind (Itin., c. 1). He offers his own version of Anselmβs ontological argument to show that nothing more than reflection on what is already in our minds is needed to produce an explicit awareness of Godβs existence.2 Reflection on the desire for happiness, which every human being has, will show that it is a desire that cannot be satisfied without possession of the supreme Good, which is God
(De Myst. Trin. 1. 17, conclusio).
A New History of Western Philosophy by Anthony Kenny
The more the economy got central planned by the government and the Federal Reserve the worse things got for the common man.
A lesson should be learned there.
Instead, Rattner suggests more central planning to combat the problems created by central planning.