disarray

I love Animes, Visual Novels and anything related to programming | 日本語勉強中

[disarray @disarray00]

@codemeoww @thsottiaux I honestly don't see a difference since 5.5~, but I think that having people saying usage is worsening is good, hopefully they will make things more transparent and accessible if there's nothing shady going on.

[disarray @disarray00]

@ErogeAreAlive This is like a dream come true 🥹, but I won’t let the hype get the better of me because the chances of it being any good are about one in a million.

[disarray @disarray00]

@xikhar I almost did it yesterday but his earlier reply to you made me wait longer, so thank you :D

[disarray @disarray00]

@webprofusion Do you realize you're replying to my comment where I explain that I used the term "source available" liberally?

But to be more clear, I think Ladybird is, as it stands, barely better than source available, hence I'm calling it "source available" (in quotes).

[disarray @disarray00]

@FallenZeraphine @awesomekling @ladybirdbrowser That's why I put "source available" in quotes... The term is being used liberally. Technically, the project is still open source, but development will only be done by the core Ladybird developers. Hence, "source available".

[disarray @disarray00]

@0xGKBRK @awesomekling @ladybirdbrowser I know it's still open source, that's why I put "source available" in quotes. Sorry if that was too difficult to realize.

[disarray @disarray00]

@not_scoutdy @TheNathanNS None of these games had their source code leaked. VC/3 were decompiled manually by the community, SA is still being decompiled but people already understand it enough to make pretty much anything with it.

[disarray @disarray00]

@airkatakana "Portuguese" with the Brazil flag besides it lol. Lusos can't stop losing.

[disarray @disarray00]

@Cllearr_ Best I could find was this

[disarray @disarray00]

@firefox Are your users in the room with us right now?

[disarray @disarray00]

@VictorTaelin Fable is starting to prompt you 💀

[disarray @disarray00]

@LexnLin > at least when I called it out, it seemed really in shock about its mistake

No wonder Google models are going to shit if they are hiring someone who types something like this.

[disarray @disarray00]

@paper_rogue Man, the twitter crowd is so mean. I think the game looks cool, not something I would consider buying, but if it's free it's solid.

[disarray @disarray00]

@StormslayerDev Even hotter take: When I read people crying about AI being used for assisting software development, I remember that Japanese man locked in an island thinking WWII was still going on years after it ended.

[disarray @disarray00]

@ONerd_X @VoceSabiaAnime Incrível, ela começou torcendo pra Argentina e a Argentina começou a perder feio. Ela deletou o post e mudou pro Egito e o Egito perdeu de virada kkkkkkkkk

[disarray @disarray00]

@jdbryantdev @discord @discord_support Fair ban tbh, a child could see this, think about becoming a game dev too and waste all their youth in front of their computer making an Undertale MMORPG.

[disarray @disarray00]

@NookSite The VN gods need to make this real 🙏

[disarray @disarray00]

@momo5502 Sound when

[disarray @disarray00]

@108sj18d @oubagaku It’s basically because OpenAI took the risk and invested heavily in infrastructure, while Anthropic was more conservative, and that has come back to bite them.
https://t.co/NdSR7DgzrD

[Chris @ChrisGPT]

Dwarkesh asks Dario a fantastic question relating to how he is so bullish on AGI yet so conservative on data center build out - Dario has an amazing take on this:

Dario Amodei details the staggering financial risk of the AI race, explaining that if growth continues at 10x a year, a company could be looking at a $1 trillion revenue run rate by the end of 2027. He notes that to support this, a firm might buy $5 trillion worth of compute.

However, he highlights a "ruinous" dilemma: if that revenue is even slightly lower than projected. specifically if it comes in at $800 billion instead of $1 trillion the company would collapse. He explains that if you are off by just a year or if the growth rate drops to 5x, "there's no force on earth, there's no hedge on earth, that could stop me from going bankrupt" after committing to that level of spend.

Because of this, Amodei argues that "behaving responsibly" means not just "yoloing" hundreds of billions of dollars. He suggests that some competitors may not have "written down the spreadsheet" and don't fully grasp the existential risks they are taking with these massive, unhedged bets on infrastructure.