FYI, I decided to do a slight name shift. I started this account as a space to complain about all the things that bothered me about specific fandoms, but that isn't how I have really ever used it
So this really isn't a salt account, it's a discourse account in the Foucault sense
This is teetering close to purity culture btw.
This is the exact same argument that my Catholic youth ministers used to vilify premarital sex & porn. They'd argue that "if you marry someone who had premarital sex or watched porn, they'll compare you to their past partners/SWs."
Gonna be blunt, if you hate AI for the fact that it destroys the environment, then you should be welcoming this change.
Plastics can take hundreds of years to decompose. Paper takes a few months. This makes a difference environmentally.
The actual problem is that there's no tv for teens. They just watch adult stuff or get their entertainment elsewhere. Every studio has a kids and adult department but nothing in-between.
The thing purists continually forget is that changing real definitions of real life harmful behaviors to suit your fictional narrative to make them more palatable is in fact a bad thing. Stop softening terms like 'toxic' and 'abusive' when they're serious for a reason.
I think this post nails it. You can't judge someone's safety and morality based on easy heuristics. Especially not by their taste in art. You have to actually pay attention to their behaviour.
art history is doomed lmao trying to find refs of historical aesthetic and imagery & whole search engine clogged and overrun with artificial img gen slop. pathetic. literally did the same ref search last year & results were dramatically different.
The data is safe.
Services are offline as we examine and strengthen them. Sorry, but needed. @internetarchive staff is working hard.
Estimated Timeline: days, not weeks.
Thank you for the offers of pizza (we are set).
And that’s very concerning.
Also: anyone else concerned that in an attention economy, where time spent on posts is always a positive thing according to the algorithm … we have to spend a lot of time scrutinizing suspected AI?
Will this not propel AI to the top of our feeds?
A big trap a lot of people fall into is that every time some kind of taboo depicted, they have to insist it’s there to teach you the viewer a lesson about what not to do in real life.
happy international lesbian day, if you use the orange and pink flag i designed and have a few bucks to spare i would really appreciate any help at all
‼️Can people please stop using 'hyper-sexual' to refer to sexual content they personally dislike when in a medical context it's a genuinely debilitating issue, & in media contexts largely refers to the marketable sexual objectification & dehumanization of women's/girl's bodies
@StephNPerkins What’s quite interesting is how “problematic” used to be a more nuanced way of describing something flawed, but now just means “morally bad”
One of the most dangerous modern developments in fandom spaces is this. Minors acting as NSFW vigilantes has become so normalized young 20-something adults will encourage minors to do this w/o seeing the issue because they participated as minors as well. We need a safety overhaul
Hey, just to be clear, I think how Yaelokre is handling their discomfort over people making fanwork of their characters is irresponsible and dangerous.
That said; if you reply to/qt them with work that makes them uncomfortable, or even talking about making it. That's harassment.
cw // violence, rape mention
You can't claim to hate antis but then act exactly like one by harassing them back. Making a threatening tweet like this is disgusting and uncalled for. I will immediately block anyone who says stuff like this, this is gross behavior.
This is absolutely true, no one can predict what becomes the next big thing on TikTok. Sudden fame can be thrilling but also TERRIFYING AF.
That's why I have sympathy. I don't condone sending out henchmen but the fear and panic is too real.