DJ Bite Down

Just your everyday cheesecake enthusiast mexican.

[brom|eblana's 𝔰𝔢𝔯𝔳𝔞𝔫𝔱 @bromyume]

she's a piece of shit but she's MY piece of shit

[razzy @Laura_Razzy]

deadlock is cool and all but i think it would benefit from having more robotic/mechanic characters. Perhaps something like a Beetle, with a program loop and a Pantokrator...

[Klonopin Centaur @facetedcarapace]

Youre laughing. The Wendy's Baconator is about to replaced with the Halal Chicken Shawarma Burger and you're laughing?

[ILoveLoughshinny&Eblana @rkz416]

#Eblana #Necrass #爱布拉娜 #死芒 #エブラナ #ネクラス #에블라나 #네크라스 #Arknights #明日方舟 #アークナイツ #명일방주

[Kaguya’s Top Gal @hayasaka_aryan]

Is trans humor only taking drugs and grooming kids

[the fierce towerjak 250/300 @mightymegalodon]

there are a million reasons why talulah isgoing to have a miserable time at rhodes island and this thing is one of them

[Solomon Grundy Want Pants Too @galvatron_p]

You later tonight

[gandalf the racist @racistbilbo]

"For no reason"

I used to take my team out to a brazilian all-you-can-eat steakhouse every month. It was great, one of my favorite restaurants of all time, and everyone else loved it too. We'd eat so much meat everytime that we felt like our hearts were gonna stop.

Then one day I had an indian guy thrust into our team by the hiring department. And as usual that month, i took my team, including the new indian guy, out to the restaurant. The next day, I got a call from HR asking if I took my team to a steakhouse. I said yeah, we do it every month. They said i cant do it anymore because the indian guy complained. It wasnt that there was nothing for him to eat, obviously im not that big of an asshole that i'd take my team somewhere that one of them cant eat, thats terrible for morale. They had plenty of vegetarian options for him. The problem was that he was a hindu so he didnt like seeing people eat cows. He said it was offensive and that we'd done it on purpose to harass him.

So one indian guy ruined a team tradition we'd been doing for 8 years, long before he got there, just by claiming "discrimination". Why? Because he was totally and completely culturally incompatible with us and should have never been allowed in the fucking country.

Shit like that is why i hate indians, not "for no reason", mr "weinstein".

[est.1997 (but spooky) @MOLENAIDE]

“Now that those comic pirating sites are down, you just have to buy-“ IT’S BEEN OUT OF PRINT FOR 35 YEARS. WHERE TF AM I GONNA READ IT.

[Veridis @VeridisArpegius]

FFXIV login problems cus of PHP vulnerabilities huh it made me remember how you're the only one who let me be vulnerable around you and not think my (in)securities as a risk. Like FFXIV I've been having problems logging in to your heart but I know we can patch this up. Lmk.

[Tôryk BirdThrowa @Torykbirdthrowa]

1. Helldivers switches to Easy Anti Cheat.
2. immediately, unmodded divers can't run the game due to either being locked out for no perceivable reason or the game crashing on startup.
3. those who CAN get in report terrible preformance, which for many also leads to crashes
4. adding EAC also basically curbs any progress on Helldivers 2 being playable on Steam Decks, because EAC hates Proton.
5. on top, many report that EAC is preventing Crossplay from working.
6. Arrowhead also avoiding saying how the most downloaded mods were QOL fixes like Hellpod Steering or Armor Transmog. or how they talked about mods in the past, and in the same update, didn't implement any long awaited QOL fixes (that the mods fixed in a week with AI, that they've "been working on" for 2+ years)
AND DESPITE ALL OF THIS!
where I gave them a week upon hearing about it this morning at about 6:30AM, modders and hackers already bypassed EAC within 4 hours of it's launch. because it's EAC.

good fuckin job Arrowhead, even your own discord is flaming you for this.

[Mizutamari @MizusPuddle]

Cover has come out and said Laplus acted the way she did the other day cause she got sent a dick pic. As someone who likes hololive, this story makes literally no sense.

First, of the only two means to communicate with her, one is permanently locked and the other is managed by Cover.

Second, she specifically addressed harassment in her live chat, nothing about DMs originally

Third, she compared whatever harassment was happening directly to how she interacts with others, suggesting whatever they did was equivalent to what she did on stream.

Finally, she clarified the main reason it was offensive to her was because she doesn't like men in her final line.

This doesnt read like a legitimate explanation from Cover, this reads like damage control. I just don't buy it.

[Marginal☘️ @sigma_goy]

Chat is it real

[Chisa @chisa_day]

-Yuri vtuber tries to larp as a perverted otaku
-Constantly makes content about being a pervert
-Gets surprised when her audience plays along
-Only call out the male fans

[Lark @king_of_limb]

dishonorably discharged from The Mickey Mouse Club because I backed over Pluto in my Toyota RAV4

[Devon Eriksen @Devon_Eriksen_]

I didn't go to college until I was 30. This gave me a chance to see it with the perspective of an adult.

One lecture in Industrial Psychology, in particular, I will never forget.

The professor spoke about how an effective job description focused on concretely measurable tasks, not vague instructions, or characteristics.

For example, "maintain an 85% or greater average on customer feedback surveys", instead of "be cheerful and upbeat", or even "interact positively with customers".

This means that goals are clear, and performance is measurable. A job is to do something, not be something.

Once some of the students had wrapped their minds around this concept, the professor decided to do a class exercise.

He asked the female students to come up with a job description for "husband". At first, this went fine. The girls noodled around a bit with things they wanted their husbands to be (tall, etc), but he was able to gradually steer them towards describing what they wanted in terms of actions.

But then he asked the male students to define a wife in the same way.

And all the girls became upset. Some of them had full-on meltdowns.

Every single thing that a male student wanted, or expected, from his hypothetical future wife was sexist, oppressive, old-fashioned, misogynistic, patriarchal, etc.

They were literally screaming. Some of them in tears.

And I realized something pretty quickly. It wasn't the actual, concrete responsibilities of the female role that they objected to.

It was the idea of there being a female role at all, with any attached responsibilities.

These women didn't want to be wives. They wanted to be pets.

What's a pet? Well a pet is not a wife, or a friend. A pet is a creature of instinct, which you bring into your home because you like how it naturally behaves.

You get a cat because you want to behave like a cat, and do things a cat naturally does, like play with string, and purr when you pet him. If he's smart, he'll adapt to you somewhat, but he doesn't have responsibilities other than "be a cat".

If you get a wife, you get a wife so she will do things for you, specific things that are the responsibilities of wife, like care for your home, bear and raise your children, cook nutritious meals so you don't have to eat processed slop, look after your emotional well-being, and so on.

These girls didn't want to be held responsible for those things. As married women, they might have anticipated doing some of them, but only some of the time. Only when they felt like it.

The cat chases the string if and when it wants to, not because chasing the string is its job.

These young millenial women didn't realize it, but they wanted to be pets. And that's what they were in their college relationships. They hung out with guys when they wanted to, had sex with them when they wanted to, broke up with them for someone new when they wanted to.

Their relationships had no element of reciprocal responsibilities. They were perfectly at home with the idea of men having responsibilities to them, but they would repay those men if they chose, and how they chose, not how the men actually wanted.

And as I've said twice already, someone you have responsibilities to, but who has none to you, is a pet, or a child.

Since our ancestors, in a moment of foolishness and weakness, allowed women to vote, it is no longer legal to dole out the corrective spankings a great many of them both need and read pornographic novels about.

Therefore, the corrective measure, for any man who finds himself with a pet instead of a wife, is to withdraw from any husbandly duties and start actively searching for alternatives.

This can either result in a correction of the behavior, or the end of a relationship that offers no value. Either is acceptable.

This may strike some of you as dishonorable, but there is no honor in keeping a broken pact, or in serving those who despise you.

Men must have the pride and self-worth to say "I will be honored and respected, or I will depart to a place where I can be, even if I must be alone there."

Men must honor and respect themselves.

[Aetius @AetiusRF]

“Flying car? How about we feed a bazillion third worlders instead? How about we invent homes for the homeless? How about we cure cancer? I’m a good heckin person you know”