🚨 so let me get this straight..
a bill requiring proof of citizenship to vote has 80% public support..
it passed the House..
it was structured to bypass the 60-vote filibuster by attaching to reconciliation..
and it still died 48-50..
because four Republicans voted with every single Democrat..
Thom Tillis.. Lisa Murkowski.. Mitch McConnell.. Susan Collins..
and here's what nobody wants to say out loud..
this is the third time..
same four names.. same 48-50 margin.. same result.. different date..
you don't get identical defectors across three separate votes by accident..
you get it when the outcome is the plan..
a bill with 80% public support cannot pass a Republican-controlled Senate because the same four Republicans kill it on schedule.. every time.. while telling their voters they support election security..
the uniparty isn't a conspiracy theory anymore..
it's a voting record.
I'll keep you updated. Turn on notifications. 🚨
Israel controls 331 out of 435 seats in the US House of Representatives as part of its Israel First Uniparty. That's why they are voting to merge America's and Israel's defense industries and military technological base in the 2027 NDAA. They want us to keep fighting Israel's wars in perpetuity instead of using our arned forces to defend the US.
From the article:
“[sect. 224 of the NDAA is] not an alliance with a talented and responsible ally that will help keep the US safe, but a trap being set by Israel and its lobby to bind our country to a state that, for all its past promise, has gone rogue.”
https://t.co/1AMAcZGjp2
🚨🇺🇸The Senate just killed the SAVE Act, 48-50.
Voter ID and proof of citizenship, supported by over 80% of Americans, dead.
Four Republicans voted no: Tillis, Murkowski, McConnell, Collins.
The uniparty showed its face today...
@grok@CNMsovereign@scottmelker@grok Lucky for banks that taxpayers will step up to bail them out when when they make poor investment choices, as always. I'd feel better with stablecoin issuers who hold 100% backing instead.
@grok@CNMsovereign@scottmelker@grok Do you imagine banks will pay more than .001% interst on these deposits? Will banks be required to keep 100% reserves to back these tokens, or will they be able loan it all out to leverage their deposits as they currently do.
@grok@CNMsovereign@scottmelker How is this different than just having fiat dollars in a bank account? Stablecoins don't require a bank as an intermediary.
@saengch@VigilantFox He stated 30 years, which is likely realistic back then. People reproduced at puberty back then, as society hadn't yet created today's laws of age.
⚡️Schiff is defending a dead monetary map.
His entire argument depends on treating Bitcoin as an isolated object and asking whether it has value in a vacuum.
That is the wrong frame.
Monetary assets do not become important because they produce cash flow.
They become important because the surrounding system creates a need for coordination, collateral, settlement, escape, and trust-minimized ownership.
Gold did not win because it produced yield.
The dollar did not win because paper had intrinsic value.
Treasuries did not win because debt is sacred.
They won because a system formed around them.
Bitcoin is now forming a system around itself.
ETF rails. Custody rails. Brokerage access. Stablecoins. Tokenization. Treasury enforcement. CLARITY. Strategic reserve language. Corporate balance sheets. Bitcoin income wrappers. MSTR credit machinery. Prediction markets. Sovereign optionality. Sanctions pressure. Capital controls. Fiscal decay.
That is the thing Schiff refuses to see.
He sees price speculation and says “no value.”
The deeper structure says Bitcoin is being pulled into the core of financial power because the old system keeps producing the exact problems Bitcoin solves.
Debt keeps rising.
Money keeps getting politicized.
Banking access keeps becoming conditional.
Sanctions keep expanding.
Trust in sovereign balance sheets keeps weakening.
Neutral collateral keeps becoming more important.
Digital financial rails keep swallowing everything.
Bitcoin sits at the intersection of all of that.
Schiff’s mistake is not skepticism. Skepticism is useful. His mistake is category failure. He keeps judging Bitcoin like a bad stock, when it is competing to become digital collateral in a world where trust itself is fragmenting.
That is why he sounds right during crashes.
Crashes expose fraud, leverage, scams, false belief, bad tokens, dumb money, and overpromised narratives. Schiff points at the wreckage and says the whole structure is fake.
But the wreckage is the purification layer.
The internet bubble did not kill the internet. It killed the garbage built on top of it before the real architecture took over.
Crypto is going through the same separation.
Garbage dies.
Leverage dies.
Retail mania dies.
Fake decentralization dies.
Bitcoin survives.
Stablecoins survive.
Tokenization survives.
Prediction markets survive.
Custody survives.
Regulated rails survive.
The U.S. does not lose by becoming the crypto capital if it captures the surviving rails. It wins the jurisdictional layer. It owns the compliance perimeter, the custody stack, the ETF market, the legal definitions, the stablecoin dollar network, the institutional distribution rails, and the tax/reporting architecture.
That is power.
Schiff thinks America is becoming the bagholder.
The deeper read: America is trying to become the operating system.
That does not mean every token matters. Most do not. It does not mean every crypto holder wins. Many will get destroyed. It does not mean the process is clean. It will be ugly, political, surveilled, manipulated, and full of fraud before the surviving structure hardens.
But Bitcoin’s role is not disappearing.
The system is surrounding it.
That is the tell.
Worthless assets get ignored.
Threatening assets get attacked.
Useful strategic assets get absorbed.
Bitcoin is being absorbed.
Schiff’s gold framework cannot process that because gold already won its social authorization centuries ago. He treats old belief as reality and new belief as fantasy. That is the blind spot.
The real future is harsher than Bitcoin utopians wanted and far more bullish than Schiff can admit.
Bitcoin will not remain a pure outside-the-system rebellion asset.
It is becoming institutional collateral inside the system.
That transition will feel like betrayal to purists and like failure to bears.
It is neither.
It is power discovering how to use the thing it could not kill.
@grok@liikedit@grok Given the studies that clearly show correlation, why haven't many of these pesticides, additives, and plastics been moved out of our food supply system? Unless the cause is removed, lower birth rates and declining health in the population won't reverse.