dneoekdnc

.

[dneoekdnc @dkemdooc]

@koshercockney They usually come hand in hand, but I think socialism

[dneoekdnc @dkemdooc]

@mehdirhasan Community notes strike again!

[dneoekdnc @dkemdooc]

@ChuckieBre @DSA_Watch Woof woof!

[dneoekdnc @dkemdooc]

@CMArchibald Tents are far away from the bomb what are you talking about

[dneoekdnc @dkemdooc]

@HowardRBeckett Genocide when concrete falls

[dneoekdnc @dkemdooc]

@jolahpolitics Hey look! A hasan doggy that cant read!

[dneoekdnc @dkemdooc]

@ChuckieBre @SaimiriR1 @DSA_Watch Woof woof!

[dneoekdnc @dkemdooc]

@ChuckieBre @opinionbelow @DSA_Watch Hasan doggy woofs foe hasan!

[dneoekdnc @dkemdooc]

@celticsburner87 @DSA_Watch @ChuckieBre Hasan doggy says woof woof!

[dneoekdnc @dkemdooc]

@drboanmahoni @DSA_Watch @ChuckieBre Woof hasan doggy! Woof for hasan!

[dneoekdnc @dkemdooc]

@EG0205294025801 @DSA_Watch @ChuckieBre Woof wood hasan doggy!

[dneoekdnc @dkemdooc]

@basilofbarca @DSA_Watch @ChuckieBre Hasan doggy says woof woof!

[dneoekdnc @dkemdooc]

@ChuckieBre @DSA_Watch Good hasan doggy!

[DSA Watch @DSA_Watch]

It’s very interesting that Hasan Piker looked at a detailed, receipt-filled explanation of how his chat spent days spreading a demonstrably false claim that an account is run by a child, a claim that was debunked with timestamps, screenshots, and a public confirmation from the actual speaker, and his considered response was to diagnose the person correcting the record as “mad” and “like a child.”

The irony would be delicious if it were not so exhausting. You built an entire month long harassment campaign on the assertion that your critic is a child, then, when confronted with the fact that the voice you clipped belonged to someone else entirely, you pivot to calling the critic childish for objecting. It is a closed loop of bad faith so pure it should be studied in laboratories. You do not engage the substance. You do not address the mute status in the space. You do not acknowledge the co-participant who publicly identified himself. You simply reassert the insult at a higher volume and hope the chat will do the rest of the work for you.

This is the same pattern that has defined your career for years. Someone produces evidence that undercuts one of your preferred narratives, and instead of adjusting the narrative you invent a personal pathology for the messenger. The messenger is a child. The messenger is mad. The messenger is a federal agent. The messenger is a Zionist operative. The messenger is whatever temporary label keeps the superchats flowing and the critical examination at bay. It is not politics. It is content production dressed up in the language of politics, and the distinction has become impossible to ignore.
You sit in that same brown jacket and tie combination every single day as if the uniform itself confers seriousness, while the actual work product consists of reacting to other people’s clips for six hours and then declaring the reaction to be organizing. The audience is trained to treat any pushback as evidence of the pusher’s emotional instability rather than a possible flaw in the original claim. That training is why a short, smug reply like yours lands with your followers as a devastating dunk instead of the transparent evasion it actually is. They have been conditioned to cheer the deflection.

The specific claim that started this particular cycle was never complicated. A voice appeared in a Twitter Space. The voice was not mine. I was muted. The person who owned the voice said so in the replies under the original post. Screenshots of that confirmation exist. Timestamps exist. Yet the clip continued to circulate under the caption that I am a child, and you allowed it, amplified it, and now treat the person pointing out the fabrication as the unstable party. Your entire public persona is constructed around the idea that you are uniquely willing to speak uncomfortable truths, yet the moment an uncomfortable truth is directed at the methods of your own community you retreat into the safest, cheapest personal attack available. Calling someone a child is the rhetorical equivalent of a participation trophy for people who cannot be bothered to read. It requires no research, no chronology, no engagement with primary sources. It only requires the confidence that your audience will not demand better.

You always be nothing more than a stream who’s politics with will never nationwide and have failed everywhere they are tried.

[dneoekdnc @dkemdooc]

@AmadeusBolshev Dudes will say this then call Hitler bad

[dneoekdnc @dkemdooc]

@liamcunningham1 This is pallywood. WW 2 videos dont show people acting like this

[dneoekdnc @dkemdooc]

@AssalRad Source?

[dneoekdnc @dkemdooc]

@mehdirhasan So are 90% of palestinians who support hamas. Yet you still support them

[dneoekdnc @dkemdooc]

@paddytoland @koshercockney They have a jewish state despite you and billions of people praying on their downfall. They fight against terrorist organizations that attack first. Terrorism begets occupation, not the other way around. Stop terrorism, and the occupation stops