In a normal world, this is who the Mayor of New York City would have hosted for dinner at his home, instead of a man who sympathizes with the folks throwing the bomb.
To you, Zohran Mamdani! You stayed quiet when we have faced massacre, when Islamic Republic assassins were sent here in New York to kill us, stay quiet now!
STOP lecturing us Iranians about peace.
I don’t feel safe in New York listening to someone like you, Mamdani, who sympathizes with the regime that killed more than 30,000 unarmed Iranians in less than 24 hours. You talk about “safety” of this beautiful city? Listen carefully; Safety without justice means nothing.
We Iranians do not allow you to lecture us about war while you had nothing to say when the Islamic Republic shot schoolgirls and blinded more than 10,000 innocent people in the streets. You were busy celebrating the hijab while women of my beloved country Iran were jailed and raped by Islamic Security forces for removing it. And NOW you find your voice to defend the regime? No. I will not let you claim the moral high ground.
The people of Iran want to be free. Where were you when they needed solidarity?
New York belongs to people who stand against terrorism not those who excuse it.
This city is stronger than fear.
Stronger than propaganda.
Stronger than you think.
So let me get this straight. You support the Khamanei regime that killed 38,000+ protesters and maimed hundreds of thousands more. A regime that has repeatedly called for Death to America and has killed thousands of our servicemen and citizens. One that has taken away women’s rights and freedoms for the Iranian people.
And then you call our efforts to destroy the evildoers a catastrophic escalation.
You also support those who attack our police force. You take the side of the criminals rather than the victims of violent actors in our city.
How is it that you can’t differentiate between good and evil?
Why is this so hard for you?
Watch this video. Sound on. There is a direct, open threat to our way of life (ie human rights, women's rights, LGBT rights) right in front of our faces and we are sleep walking right toward it. People need to wake up and push back against this impending disaster.
All I see looking at 2025 chart is that pitchers are still not consistently having their best executed pitches on the black called strikes. The pic is also incomplete in that it depicts a 2D strike zone whereas the rules/real life is meant to be a 3D strike zone
One of the coolest visualizations I've ever seen-- the evolution of the MLB strike zone from 2007 to 2025.
The zone has changed dramatically-- going from vibes to nearly matching the rulebook definition perfectly.
They're remarkably good.
https://t.co/TKy6Vcteyp
NYC can expect more instances of anti-Semitic violence (and slaps on the wrist for the perpetrators) when Mamdani appoints open anti-Semites throughout his government. Anyone who believes Mamdani is a "friend of the Jews" needs to stretch their eyes and ears beyond his PR videos
Remember when StopAntisemitism exposed sisters Aya and Dana Baraket tearing down posters of kidnapped Israeli children while screaming "F*ck Israel"?
A man by the name of Alvaro Lopez referred to them as "heroes".
Lopez was just named as Brooklyn Borough Director by NYC Mayor Mamdani.
There are approximately half a million Jews living in Brooklyn - and bigot Alvaro Lopez is overseeing them.
"I'm going to kill Jewish people."
"We wouldn't be in this mess if the holocaust had happened"
***stabs visibly Jewish person**
.... released on bail
Could you imagine what this news story would look like if any other minority group was the victim? This is insanity.
Everyone who has escaped jihadist occupation felt a chill hearing this 😳
Mamdani is casually invoking “Hijra” — the historical turning point scholars identify as the moment Islamic movement shifted into a political-military project, when militants aligned with armed factions in Medina and Islamic “migration” became a strategy of invasion of the entire Middle East and occupation of our homelands.
That reference is not benign.
Mamdani is not merely a Muslim — he is, de facto, an Islamist, and what he just did is dangerous.
There is a clear distinction between:
•Muslims, whose private faith is legally protected;
•Jihadism, the violent doctrine of imposing Sharia and a caliphate;
•Islamism, a form of political warfare that facilitates and normalizes the path to jihad.
Islamization is not faith.
Islamization is a deliberate political warfare strategy:
infiltration of institutions, harassment and intimidation, disinformation, propaganda, front organizations, lobbying networks, lawfare, and gradual policy capture — all designed to normalize Islamic supremacy inside secular systems until resistance is labeled “illegal” or “racist.”
No, we cannot ban Muslims from holding office @LauraLoomer . That would violate the Constitution and international human rights law.
But when a public official uses Islamic doctrine, religious pillars, or clerical narratives to shape American public policy, he is not expressing faith — he is weaponizing religion as a political tool.
That is not protected belief.
That is subversion of constitutional order.
Islamist power is backed by state sponsors, billions in funding, global networks, militias, kidnappers, assassins, and a long, documented history of undermining democracies from within before force is ever used.
By injecting Islamic ideology into American governance, Mamdani crossed a constitutional and national-security red line.
This is not speech.
This is abuse of office.
He should be removed from office — not for being Muslim, but for advancing a foreign ideological project fundamentally incompatible with a secular republic and American values.
Private belief is protected.
Islamization is not — and must not be tolerated.
The cop not only separated himself from the man charging at him, but also closed a door in between himself and the assailant before having to finally have to defend himself.
This is excellent police work.
Mamdani clearly hates police.
Mamdani specifically ended homeless sweeps because he thought it was more empathetic to ask mentally ill homeless people to make a rational choice to go to a shelter rather than force them & save their lives. This may be the 1st instance of Homicidal Empathy as public policy