@xpress_racer@dochka_yurka Причому тут запити ?) Це про банальну обізнаність і базову анатомію, гарна порада що для тих хто "а пачіму он нє зарабатытывет 5к долларов в день" і "пачіму у нее целлюлит" що свідчить про розумову відсталість, позакривати пиздаки і не світитись в медіа
@DzyaArmen @Mama_Said_KYO @BxciiNG@DAZNBoxing@usykaa@Turki_alalshikh AHHAHAHAH, Some russian kids dream's
No way they are in top 5, especially betterbiev, who fought only 2 serious opponent, 1 of them stolen win, second one didn't want to fight, fought to got payed
@dobrij_kit@grushechka__@halyavka_p Який маєток під Києвом, він його орендує, а за виїзд за кордон по машини я взагалі мовчу, шкода що з такими "вкраїнчиками" як ти доводиться жити
@zla_kvochka_v_3@right_dexter Не тільки для росіян, в нас багато хто заслужив на це, в основному в політиці сидять і кілька промосковських підорів на волі
Бля, яка хуйня несеться в твіттері і в інфополі. Нам і русня не потрібна щоб перехуярити один одного. Одні далбайоб не розуміють що кажуть, інші з накачаними губами ні разу не відвідавши урок історії думають що колись прийде мир з русачками😅
1. Притягнення до відповідальності Тищенко та його титушек
2. Відсторонення Содоля та проведення по ньому розслідування
3. Початок внутрішнього розслідування по заступнику директора ДБР
4. Розслідування по витоку справ у НАБУ та притягнення винних до відповідальності
@Molfar_4308 Було абсолютно легально, і реклама казино не була обмежена, тобто це не порушення закону. Просто знайти аби до кого доїбатись, чому тоді не ставлять питання до органу КРАЇЛ який видає ліцензії всім підряд на ведення онлайн-ігорного бізнесу...
@Molfar_4308 Читаю коментарі і розумію що людям не потрібно в чомусь розбиратися, аби закенселити когось. Вони не розуміють що арбітраж - це не шахрайство, а назва методу реклами в соц.мережах/Гугл. Не дивились інтерв'ю де він розказував що по Україні не працює, хоча до квітня цього року все
В той момент коли спільнота Фейсбук та Твіттер по крихтах збирає допомогу воїнам ЗСУ (низький уклін) та намагається всіма силами дати опір росії.
Спільнота тікТок хайпує, організовує челенджи проти військових на "русскам язікє і в кастюмє адідас?"
У нас точно повномаштабна війна?
Я вже сам заплутався.
https://t.co/jHGSCIcpXS
Аккаунт блохєра
https://t.co/n1cVw2lz9A
Nonsense. That's the first word that comes to mind in the context of the current ban on the transfer of Western weapons to Azov.
Few people in Ukraine know about it, and almost no one speaks about it publicly. It's time to pay attention to this Kafkaesque situation and make it public.
Since 2017, a number of US Consolidated Appropriation Bills have contained the following amendment: "None of the funds made available by this Act may be used to provide weapons, training, or other assistance to the Azov Battalion".
In 2015, Congressman John Conyers Jr, a Democrat from Michigan, proposed this amendment to the Department of Defense Appropriations Bill for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016. The congressman made the proposal, noting that Foreign Affairs magazine, as well as "other leading media outlets", had characterized the Azov battalion as "openly neo-Nazi" and "fascist".
According to media reports, the Department of Defense subsequently called for the proposed amendment to be withdrawn, arguing that aid to Azov should already be prohibited by the Leahy Act, which states that "no assistance shall be provided to ... any unit of the security forces of a foreign country if the Secretary of State has credible information that such unit has committed a gross violation of human rights." At the time, the ban on providing arms to Azov was not included in the final bill.
However, in 2017, this amendment was already included in the text of the Appropriations Bill. It is also present in this year's Defense Appropriation Bill.
It is noteworthy that the Leahy Law, which requires that incidents of human rights violations be reviewed on the basis of specific facts, was not applied to Azov, and the decision to adopt the amendment was primarily based on the characterization of Azov by Western media, which apparently formed their attitude towards the unit under the influence of Moscow propaganda. All of the main accusations against Azov have been repeatedly refuted on the basis of facts on the Internet and in the media. In particular, on https://t.co/G4nvJp5lso
Does it make sense to point out once again that the very wording "Azov battalion" used in the law actually refers to a non-existent unit? At the end of 2014, Azov ceased to be a battalion and became a separate special forces detachment. Since February 2023, our unit has been the 12th Special Forces Brigade Azov of the National Guard of Ukraine. Not a battalion, not a regiment. It is a brigade.
It is this amendment, which wanders from one Appropriation Bill to another from year to year, that is the reason why in 2022, during the defense of Mariupol, Azov did not have the modern Western weapons.
At that time, we were holding back the enemy's superior forces in the besieged Mariupol, using the extremely limited resources we had, and we showed extremely high efficiency. How many lives could have been saved and what would have been the results of the city's defense if, in addition to high motivation, cohesion and professionalism, Azov had modern armored vehicles and artillery systems at its disposal?
Even after 2022, when it seemed that the world had finally learned the truth about Azov, we still cannot send our soldiers to most of the leading Western military exercises and do not receive the necessary weapons that our allies provide to Ukraine. This problem is partly solved by volunteers and conscious Ukrainians who do their best to help the unit: for example, the volunteer project "Tylovyky" raised 77 million UAH for 17 FV432 Bulldog armored personnel carriers for the Azov Brigade. But the war demands more.
Now the entire Ukraine is experiencing what Azov has been dealing with since 2014. Unfortunately, Azov has become not only the first unit in the Ukrainian army to implement Western military standards, but also one of the first and main targets of Moscow's propaganda. Since the beginning of the Russian-Ukrainian war in 2014, Moscow has accused Azov of "neo-Nazism" and sought to destroy it. In 2022, the Russians wanted to "denazify" the whole of Ukraine, labeling the entire nation as "Nazis." 10 years ago, no one helped Azov resist the influence of the Kremlin's multibillion-dollar propaganda machine. Today, the whole country is in the same situation. And just as Azov has been experiencing for 10 years, Ukraine may now face a lack of Western assistance.
I emphasize that the very existence of such amendments and prohibitions not only prevents Azov from performing its combat missions more effectively, but is a blow to the defense capability of our country, tarnishes Ukraine's image on the international level and is humiliating for the entire Ukrainian army.
There is no evidence or confirmation of the accusations that Russian propaganda has been spreading about Azov for 10 years. If there were, delegations of Azov fighters would not have been received in the United States, in European countries, and in Israel. Azov members would not have held meetings with representatives of the U.S. Congress and human rights organizations. They would not have spoken at the UN, the Council of Europe, or at the best Western universities. They would not have given interviews to the world's leading media and would not have participated in panel discussions at major military conferences. This is the absurdity of the situation: Azov is being welcomed at the highest level throughout the Western world, but still not given weapons.
Azov is used to overcoming difficulties on its own. We were the first unit in Ukraine to adopt NATO standards, and we did it on our own initiative. Without Western weapons, we have become one of the most capable units in the country in 10 years. Our fighters are returning to the ranks after Russian captivity, fighting the enemy and fulfilling all the tasks set by the command.
No obstacles will stop us on our way.
However, justice demands answers. How many more refutations of the Kremlin's lies do we have to provide before politicians in the West finally open their eyes to the truth? How long will a structural unit of the Security and Defense Forces of Ukraine, subordinated to the military leadership of the state, be stigmatized by such humiliating amendments?
And most importantly, how many more Ukrainian soldiers, fighters of our brigade, who are defending not only the freedom and independence of Ukraine, but also the entire free Western world from the real, unimagined Nazis of today, must die and be wounded because of the lack of necessary modern Western weapons, so that Azov is finally removed from the Appropriations Bill and all "black lists"?