Imagine being so afraid of history that you literally chisel one word out of a monument.
In Brussels, there is a monument honoring Belgian soldiers who fought slave traders in the Congo. The original inscription referred to “Arab slave traders.”
Then the word “Arab” was removed.
Think about that for a second.
Belgium’s crimes in Congo should absolutely be taught and remembered. But why should that mean hiding another uncomfortable part of history?
If Arab slave traders were involved, why erase the word? Why not leave the monument as it was and add context explaining the full history?
Are we supposed to learn from history, or edit it until nobody feels uncomfortable?
And this is the bigger question: if people are willing to literally remove words from historical monuments because the facts are inconvenient today, what else are they trying to erase from our collective memory?
Saudi Arabia is not an apartheid state – Public practice of any religion other than Islam is prohibited. Non-Muslim houses of worship may not be built. Apostasy and non-Muslim proselytizing are criminalized; conversion from Islam is punishable by death on the books. Naturalization requires the applicant to be Muslim.
Lebanon is not an apartheid state – Law No. 296 of 2001 bars anyone without citizenship of a “recognized state” from acquiring real property. Palestinian refugees fall under this ban and cannot legally buy or, in practice, inherit real estate after 2001. They remain excluded from dozens of licensed professions and from citizenship after generations born in the country.
Kuwait is not an apartheid state – The Nationality Law requires that a person seeking naturalization “be an original Muslim by birth, or that he has converted to Islam.” Non-Muslims are barred from naturalization. Women cannot confer nationality on their children on the same terms as men.
Qatar is not an apartheid state – Qatari women cannot confer nationality on their children born to a non-Qatari father, with no exception. Citizenship applications by long-term residents are capped and rarely granted. The kafala sponsorship system ties a migrant worker’s legal status to a citizen sponsor.
United Arab Emirates is not an apartheid state – Citizenship is transmitted primarily through the father. Naturalization is exceptional and tightly limited. The kafala system places migrant workers’ residency and job mobility under a citizen sponsor.
Pakistan is not an apartheid state – The Constitution (Article 260) and Ordinance XX declare Ahmadis non-Muslims. Penal Code sections 298-B and 298-C make it a crime for Ahmadis to call themselves Muslim, use Islamic terminology, or preach their faith, punishable by imprisonment. Blasphemy under section 295-C carries the death penalty.
Iran is not an apartheid state – Constitution Article 13 recognizes only Zoroastrians, Jews, and Christians as religious minorities. Baha’is are excluded from official recognition, identity documents listing their faith, university admission on equal terms, and communal property rights.
Afghanistan is not an apartheid state – Under Taliban rule, apostasy and blasphemy are capital offenses. Non-Muslims and converts have no legal pathway to public worship or equal civic status.
Maldives is not an apartheid state – The Constitution states that only a Muslim may be a citizen. Conversion from Islam can result in loss of citizenship. Apostasy and blasphemy remain capital offenses on the books.
Mauritania is not an apartheid state – Apostasy is a capital offense. Conversion from Islam can result in loss of citizenship rights. Hereditary slavery of the Haratin (Black) population by Bidhan (Arab-Berber) groups has persisted despite formal abolition.
Yemen is not an apartheid state – Apostasy is punishable by death. Public non-Muslim worship is not protected. Personal-status rules follow Sharia distinctions between Muslims and non-Muslims.
Egypt is not an apartheid state – The Constitution names Islam as the state religion and the principles of Sharia as the main source of legislation. Unrecognized groups such as Baha’is cannot obtain identity documents reflecting their faith. Muslim women cannot legally marry non-Muslim men unless the man converts. Blasphemy is criminalized.
Jordan is not an apartheid state – A Muslim woman cannot legally marry a non-Muslim man unless he converts. Nationality is transmitted through the father; citizen women cannot confer nationality on children or foreign spouses on equal terms. Converts from Islam face bureaucratic and family-law disadvantages.
Syria is not an apartheid state – Personal-status law follows Sharia rules that restrict Muslim women’s marriage to non-Muslims. Palestinian refugees hold a distinct legal status and do not acquire full citizenship.
>>
Summary of Arab Terror Attacks in Judea and Samaria — September 20, 2026
11:30 — Shooting attack at the Ein Raya spring near Neve Tzuf. A 30-year-old Israeli was killed.
12:36 — Attempted ramming attack at the Ganim checkpoint. No casualties. Israeli forces killed the attackers.
13:08 — Initial report of a Jewish Israeli who mistakenly entered a village in the Hebron Hills and is currently being attacked and is apparently wounded. Large forces are en route.
13:39 — Attempted ramming attack against Israeli troops on Route 458 at the Rimonim Junction. The truck driver has been detained and is being questioned at the scene.
13:42 — A vehicle without license plates attempted to run over two Israelis from Givat Yeshuat Yisrael on the road near Silwad cemetery. No casualties. The vehicle fled the scene.
And somehow, the conversation is still about “settler violence.”
Israel in an apartheid state - Arabs make up about 21% of Israel’s population.
Israel in an apartheid state - Arab citizens of Israel can vote in national elections on the same legal basis as other Israeli citizens.
Israel in an apartheid state - Every vote has the same legal value. Israel’s parliamentary elections are required by law to be national, direct, equal, secret and proportional.
Israel in an apartheid state - Arab citizens serve in Israel’s parliament. As of 2026, Arab and Druze lawmakers serve both in Arab-led political parties and in broader national parties.
Israel in an apartheid state - Arab lawmakers can lead parliamentary committees. For example, Arab lawmaker Yasir Hujeirat currently chairs the parliament’s Science and Technology Committee.
Israel in an apartheid state - Arab politicians have served as government ministers. Arab citizens have held cabinet-level positions in Israeli governments.
Israel in an apartheid state - An Arab political party has participated in an Israeli governing coalition. In 2021, the Arab party Ra’am became part of the coalition supporting Israel’s government.
Israel in an apartheid state - Arab citizens also serve in major political parties that are not specifically Arab parties. Current examples include representatives in Likud, Yesh Atid, Yisrael Beitenu and other parties.
Israel in an apartheid state - Israel’s Declaration of Independence promises complete social and political equality to all citizens regardless of religion, race or sex. It also guarantees freedom of religion, conscience, language, education and culture.
Israel in an apartheid state - The Declaration of Independence specifically called on Arab residents to participate in building the country on the basis of “full and equal citizenship.”
Israel in an apartheid state - Arabic has legally recognized special status in Israel. Israeli law specifically protects the use and status of Arabic in dealings with government institutions.
Israel in an apartheid state - Non-Jewish citizens have the legal right to observe their own religious holidays and weekly days of rest.
Israel in an apartheid state - Arab judges serve in Israel’s court system, including at the highest levels of the judiciary. Arab judges have served on Israel’s Supreme Court as well as lower courts.
Israel in an apartheid state - Arab students are strongly represented in Israeli universities and colleges. More than 60,000 Arab students were enrolled in higher education in 2023–2024.
Israel in an apartheid state - Arab students now make up about 20% of undergraduate students in Israel. Their share reached a record 20.4%, roughly matching their share of the overall population.
Israel in an apartheid state - The number and proportion of Arab university students have roughly doubled since 2009–10. The increase has occurred at bachelor’s, master’s and doctoral levels.
Israel in an apartheid state - Israel operates a large Arabic-language public-school system. Arab children can attend schools where Arabic is the main language of instruction.
Israel in an apartheid state - Arab citizens play a major role in Israel’s healthcare system. The share of Arab doctors has risen substantially and is approaching their share of the population.
Israel in an apartheid state - Around 30% of new doctors entering Israel’s medical system are Arab.
Israel in an apartheid state - Arab Israelis make up roughly one-third of pharmacists in Israel. This is higher than their share of the overall population.
Israel in an apartheid state - Arab men and women work alongside Jewish Israelis throughout the healthcare system. Hospitals, clinics and pharmacies are among the most integrated workplaces in Israeli society.
Israel in an apartheid state - Arab women’s participation in the workforce has increased significantly. Among Arab women aged 25–54, labor-force participation reached about 50% in 2023.
>>
@simulcopd@Libersailor Nel ‘47 anche gli ebrei venivano chiamati palestinesi, gli altri erano arabi. Gli arabi che sono rimasti in Israele, non sono stati toccati e ora sono 2 milioni di cittadini israeliani.
@RalLuna1@Libersailor Tramite pallywood, hanno venduto l’esatto opposto e hanno avuto successo. Propal che non analizzano i fatti e saltano gli episodi storici a convenienza.
Los coptos no tienen un país propio.
Los asirios no tienen un país propio.
Los yazidíes no tienen un país propio.
Los drusos no tienen un país propio.
Los maronitas no tienen un país propio.
Todos ellos son pueblos antiguos con siglos de historia documentada, que han sufrido persecución extrema y genocidio a manos de musulmanes. Y, sin embargo, ni un solo activista de izquierda apoya la idea de que deberían tener sus propias patrias.
Pero, de alguna manera, se supone que los «palestinos» —que no son más que árabes sin una cultura o identidad distintiva— deben tener su propio Estado, a pesar de que ya existen docenas de países árabes y musulmanes que pueden considerar su hogar.
¿Puede alguien explicar por qué?
Vía @realMaalouf