@AnamnesisF@nkulule59069862 You are a master of debate; without a doubt, at the moment there is no midfield in the world that surpasses Portugal's midfield.
@DiegoRibas97 They don't know that Kylian will become the best player in World Cup history in 2026.
They don't know what it means to be the best player in the history of the World Cup.
This means that if we remove Kylian's entire career except for the World Cup, he is among the 10 greatest
@BarcaFAC@DiegoRibas97 What you're saying is nonsense, my friend. I just heard Schneider say this was the greatest match in football history in terms of defensive and attacking quality. The Barcelona-Inter match wasn't that good; it was boring because of defensive errors.
@DegurechaffSama The logical evaluation of players is based on their performance in the tournament, regardless of whether they win it or not. For example, Messi won the league with Paris and was not good in 2021-2022, and Cristiano achieved a record of 35 goals in Saudi Arabia and did not win
@tichyburner Doku only completed 6 successful dribbles in those minutes according to the logical criteria for evaluating a dribble, not 11 successful dribbles.
@Poesianasarjeta I completely agree with you. Furthermore, Belgium under Martinez didn't have any big stars except for Hazard, De Bruyne, and Lukaku. They were a very average team compared to the other top teams. Third place was a great achievement for Martinez.
@woldeneagle Do you think this is enough to evaluate players historically?
I think that's not enough; other criteria should be added for the evaluation to be logical.
@woldeneagle According to logical criteria
1_ Player's abilities (passing, scoring, dribbling and defensive support)
2_ Individual performance in major matches (Champions League , WC and CA)
3_ Continuity
4_ The peak of the player
I think your evaluation was only on the players' abilities