I’m calling on my MP @beaverslorraine to back Long Live The Local. Pubs and breweries need our support! Sign today at https://t.co/298a0f2555 #longlivethelocal
Everyone is saying it, and they're right really. Two Ashes Tests in London, and another one an hour on the rattler from Waterloo. Farcical treatment of the north. Both Headingley and Old Trafford are storied homes of cricket.
@SenseiBear44 The greatest player of his generation hounded out by the ECB. Been treated like shit by them all his career. Hopefully he’ll now go and earn millions in franchise cricket
Andy Burnham replacing Starmer is like being a kid in hospital in the 70s and being told Saville isn't coming, only to hear a digeridoo and a wobble board down the corridor
Today marks 13 years since two cowardly Muslims murdered Lee Rigby.
They drove into him so he couldn't fight back, and began butchering him in broad daylight in "Modern London".
Those in power want us to forget.
We never will.
His name will live on.
RIP Lee 🙏🏻 🇬🇧
I still can't get my head around this.
Keir Starmer *took the knee* for George Floyd.
He *spoke in parliament* about Adolescence, a fictional Netflix series.
But when Henry Nowak, a young white lad, is *stabbed to death* by a Sikh man and HANDCUFFED by police while he was dying, Keir Starmer says ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!
The man is morally repugnant.
I utterly despise him.
Respect to Robert Jenrick for speaking up for Henry Nowak in Parliament today.
Instead of trying to save his life, police handcuffed him as he was bleeding to death because they heard "muh racism"
They all need prosecuted alongside the coward attacker!
The fact that @AndyBurnhamGM never really cared about those victims will come back to bite him in the arse.
If I lived in Makerfield, I'd be well pissed off that he's using them as a stepping stone to get into number 10.
@MaggieOliverUK
PATRICK DESTROYS THE LIES IN ONE MINUTE: Black Briton of 35 Years Explains Why He Marched With Tommy Robinson – “It’s My Responsibility to Support My English Friends!”
@Chackdubdub has just dropped the video that the two-tier media and Keir Starmer’s smear machine NEVER want you to see – and it’s going viral for all the right reasons.
Meet Patrick.
35 years a proud resident of the United Kingdom.
Living in Kettering – a town where he was literally “one of only 4 black people.”
He attended last year’s Unite the Kingdom march and he’s back with the same crystal-clear message: this isn’t about colour. It’s about Britain.
Patrick speaks straight from the heart about mass immigration, the need to protect our shared home, and his personal sense of duty: “I have a responsibility to support my English friends.”
No virtue-signalling. No leftist script. Just a man who loves this country, sees what’s happening, and chooses to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with patriots under the Union Jack.
This is the reality Starmer, the BBC and the far-left desperately hide: the Unite the Kingdom march has ALWAYS welcomed people of every background who put Britain first. It’s never been about race – it’s about stopping the replacement, the grooming, the two-tier chaos and the cultural erosion that’s tearing communities apart. Patrick gets it. Thousands of other non-white Brits get it. And today they’re proving it again in Parliament Square.
While Keir Starmer brands us all “far-right thugs” and “the worst people on the planet,” ordinary patriots like Patrick – along with grandmothers like Hilda and Joan, mums, dads and working families of every colour – are already flooding London hours early. Singing. Dancing. Waving nothing but the Union Jack. Peaceful. Proud. United.
They rolled out 4,000 officers, armoured vehicles, live facial recognition and riot gear against nanas and mothers… because the establishment is terrified of this exact image: a Black Briton standing proudly beside white Brits saying “enough” to open borders and elite betrayal.
Patrick isn’t an outlier. He’s the proof.
The march isn’t “racist” – the people calling it racist are the real racists, obsessed with skin colour while we’re obsessed with saving our country.
@Chackdubdub – absolute legend for posting this. Your video is pure red-pill truth at the perfect time. Patrick is a hero and a patriot. Britain needs more voices like his.
To every single person already in London or heading to the Unite the Kingdom march right now:
This is why we’re here.
Stay peaceful. Stay proud. Stay British.
Film everything. Smile bigger. Wave the flag higher. Let the world see the real diversity – the one based on love of country, not hate.
Patrick showed the way. Today we follow it together.
The mask is completely off. The British people – of every colour who love this island – are rising.
RESIGN, KEIR. Britain belongs to the British.
Massive respect to Patrick and @Chackdubdub. Share this far and wide – let every patriot see the truth the establishment wants buried.
See you in Parliament Square. The future belongs to those who show up united. 🔥🇬🇧
WATCH: Tommy Robinson plays a hilarious video exposing Keir Starmer’s hypocrisy after journalists and commentators — including Rebel News’ @EzraLevant and @OzraeliAvi — were banned from entering the UK ahead of the Unite the Kingdom rally.
@LindsayHoyle_MP I've been interested in and followed politics all my adult life im 75 now and i have never seen the HOCs so bad. MPs on their phones during debate's the standard of dress sorry to say from some of the women MPs is appalling (not all) i hasten to add,the Ungentlemanly behaviour towards each other of other parties. A PM that will not answer directly questions put to him at PMQs, the standards have dropped into the gutter the mother of all parliaments has descended into a shit show,just like the country as a whole.
Earlier today, I posted about overhearing someone in a café - enjoying a full English breakfast while complaining to the owner that their housing association wasn't fixing problems in their social housing fast enough. I implied that someone on benefits shouldn't be dining out. I want to clarify my position.
I fully and completely stand by it.
If you are getting paid not to work, I am paying for you. You are reaching into my pocket and taking money I earned and made available to the government as part of my obligation as a taxpayer. That creates an obligation on your end - to spend as little of that money as possible.
This is exactly the same standard I apply to government itself. Every public body, from the NHS to the council fixing potholes, owes the taxpayer the same duty: extract maximum value from the budget you're given. I see no reason why individuals receiving benefits should be held to a lower standard. They are spending someone else's money.
If you can afford to dine out, you should not be on benefits. You should not be in social housing. To me, that is a clear signal that you are receiving too much and abusing the system. I am not willing to fund someone's restaurant meals while also housing them.
Benefits and social housing are meant to be a bridge, not a destination. They exist to carry people through hardship until they can stand on their own. Social housing is temporary accommodation - it is not a home. At least, it shouldn’t be. The moment it stops being treated as temporary, the entire logic of the safety net collapses.
This brings me to the part people will call draconian. The moment public funds begin flowing into your bank account, you should expect zero privacy into your family's finances. That should be the deal - stated plainly, signed away upfront. You get the money. We, the taxpayers whose money you are spending, get full visibility into how it is spent.
Cash withdrawals should be disabled by default from any account receiving benefits. If cash is needed, invoices and receipts should be uploaded promptly. If they don't reconcile, if dates are wrong, if there is any suspicion of luxury spending or wrongdoing - benefits stop. Simple as that.
I know people will invoke human rights and privacy. My answer is equally simple. You take my money, I take your privacy. If you spend that money without taking the mickey, you have nothing to worry about. And I think a great many people would think twice about abusing the system if this contract were real.
Because here is the truth: if you are in genuine hardship and you know the money you are receiving belongs to someone else, you are not dining out. You are not buying luxuries. You are spending the bare minimum to keep yourself going until you find the next job and get off the benefits. That is what genuine hardship looks like.
There are plenty of countries in the world where this safety net does not exist at all - where individual families bear the entire burden, and where those without family simply fall. We should never become one of those countries. We should always help those facing hardship through no fault of their own. But the point of a safety net is that you bounce back. If you cling to it indefinitely, it becomes impossible for those of us maintaining it through our taxes to keep it standing.
For anyone facing genuine hardship, this system - this social contract - will work just fine. It is only a problem if you are abusing it. And that is exactly the point.
Dear Prime Minister & Home Secretary,
I hope this letter finds you well, fully caffeinated, and in possession of a calculator.
I’m writing with what I believe is a modest, fiscally responsible proposal. I understand the Government is offering up to £40,000 to certain individuals to voluntarily leave the United Kingdom. First of all — bold strategy. Nothing says “strong borders” quite like a cashback scheme.
Now, I regret to inform you that I am, in fact, a fully tax-paying, law-abiding British citizen. I know — awkward. I appreciate this may disqualify me from the premium exit package, but I’m willing to negotiate.
I would like to formally apply for £35,000 to leave.
You see, unlike some applicants, I haven’t broken any laws to get here. I didn’t arrive by dinghy. I didn’t require processing, housing, or legal appeals. I’ve actually been funding the whole operation through PAYE for years — which I believe makes me a loyal shareholder in this enterprise.
Given that you’re prepared to offer £40,000 for someone to depart voluntarily after entering illegally, I feel £35,000 for someone who’s been here legally all along represents excellent value for money. Think of it as a “Buy British, Get One Gone” discount.
For £35,000 I will:
• Leave quietly.
• Not require a press conference.
• Not demand a diversity officer to wave me off.
• Even carry my own suitcase to the airport.
I may also tweet a polite thank-you note on departure, praising the efficiency of the scheme.
Frankly, it feels like I’ve misunderstood how incentives work in modern Britain. All these years I thought obeying the law, paying taxes, and contributing to society were the winning strategy. Turns out the real pro-move is to arrive unlawfully and wait for a loyalty bonus.
Who knew?
While British families are juggling rent, energy bills, and the weekly food shop like contestants on a dystopian game show, it’s reassuring to know the Treasury has located a spare £40,000 per head for voluntary goodbyes.
May I ask — is there a points card? Ten years of National Insurance contributions and I get a free exit bonus? If so, I believe I’m overdue.
In the spirit of fairness and fiscal responsibility, I am not even asking for the full £40,000. I’m trimming £5,000 off to help balance the books. That’s the kind of responsible budgeting I was raised on.
If successful, I promise to:
• Leave via a scheduled flight (economy is fine).
• Not stage a protest on the runway.
• And refrain from re-entering on a small boat to see if I qualify twice.
All I ask is equal treatment. If departure is now a funded career pathway, I would very much like to submit my CV.
Yours in hopeful relocation,
A slightly confused taxpayer
As a young Brit, I proudly welcome President Trump to our country.
He’s Britain’s greatest ally. In all honesty, he cares more about the wellbeing of the British people than Keir Starmer’s Labour government ever has or ever will.
Count yourselves lucky, America.
I’ll leave you this from @Katie_Lam_MP ..
Why aren’t @UKLabour allowing a National enquiry or forcing local ones ?
This was & still is going on in dozens of towns and cities across the UK, people in authority turn a blind eye.
Please share.