@mizmyerz@GroundWarZero1 А как это сочетается с тем, что японцы, по слухам, очень требовательны к сервису и не станут терпеть некачественное обслуживание? Слухи ложные или это как-то сочетается?
@idealnyinapl@m_troitskiy А что насчёт воли тех, кто зарабатывал, чтобы оставить детям? Зачем им работать, стараться, да даже заводить детей вообще, если их имущество кто-то чужой потом отберет у их детей?
@peterloss Каждое усложнение обхода уменьшает количество пользователей, которые станут заморачиваться за обход, повышая тем самым риски для каждого конкретного обходящего. В пределе просто точечно пересажают самых упорных.
@ramirocanadas The problem is as soon as you make such a complex system there would appear dozens of ways to game said system, e.g. you (as a ruler) make it hard to buy housing, put people in prison and deny them education. In several years only the loyal to you have a right to vote.
Here's roughly the I remarks I delivered to the intelligence community folks:
Good evening. I am Nate Soares, the president of the Machine Intelligence Research Institute, a nonprofit founded to make AI go well.
Artificial intelligence is different from other technologies. Normal technologies cannot improve themselves. Normal technologies cannot outthink their creators. Normal technologies cannot break themselves out of the lab.
Nor can AI – yet. But creating the sort of AI that can is the explicit purpose of the top AI labs. They say they're trying to "create superintelligence in the true sense of the word", and heading towards "a country worth of geniuses in a datacenter".
And AI keeps moving faster than experts expect. In 2021, the average expert prediction for how long before AI could win an International Math Olympiad Gold Medal was 22 years. In reality, it happened last year.
To make matters worse, nobody understands how AI works – not even the people who create it. AI is grown like an organism, not hand-crafted like traditional software. Few outside the industry appreciate this fact, despite the AI builders affirming it repeatedly.
Racing to grow superintelligent machines that nobody understands is a recipe for disaster.
The people behind AI are spooked. Industry leaders and Nobel prize winers alike have warned of the possibility of catastrophe. Multiple AI executives have said that, ideally, the world would slow down this reckless race. The level of danger here far exceeds what we'd accept in any other industry.
Most of the world hasn't understood that danger yet. But that's starting to change.
This suggests a critical role for the intelligence community: prepare for a huge shift in geopolitics as the world orients to AI.
Humanity is going to need global coordination to stop this suicide race, once our leaders realize the danger. And that global coordination is going to require support from the intelligence community.
It's going to require the capacity to know where the chips are, and how they're being used. It's going to require capacity to monitor whether international agreements are being followed. World leaders are going to need to know when someone's trying to create a superintelligence that would put the world at risk, so that they can respond.
I hope the intelligence community can rise to the challenge that AI poses. It is the most pressing global security threat of our age.