dom

[dom @dom43766942]

@keto_crusader @mattyfbrown Still trash lol

[dom @dom43766942]

@SpursUpNext Because teams are allowed to acquire players that they did not draft...pretty simple

[dom @dom43766942]

@JonahPlatt @damanr Is this satire or truly serious? I mean, the "stuff that doesn't show up on the stat sheet" helps paint the picture but its not unforgivably wildly outlandish to decide to not pay a 7 and 4 guy 10 million a year...

[dom @dom43766942]

@kcburton12 @shawnsmith0424 @KaleiRenay @aydan There are things in this world that no matter how much you could pay someone, can never be accomplished at a near perfect percentage. If it were possible, those guys would be signed. That simple. Tons of super technical elements to booting a football and the body isn't robotic.

[dom @dom43766942]

@kcburton12 @shawnsmith0424 @KaleiRenay @aydan 1. There is no chance that NFL front offices aren't signing the very best kickers possible. 2. Percentages inside of 40 yards are staggering...so are you saying you expect perfection? 3. If the NFL has never had a perfect kicker in its 102 years, maybe its harder than it looks.

[dom @dom43766942]

@Ralph_MasonJr why on earth would Hornets give all that up

[dom @dom43766942]

@GitgudB @TBE_Newbzz Lol there's no professional advantage for posting this on Twitter. These guys are on Discord and can contact each other if they're looking for new duo partners. This is literally just for the drama.

[dom @dom43766942]

@LyfeStiles @thejonstewart @NathanE11 If I remember correctly, the reports and cited character issue incidents on Malik were made known throughout his college career. I think that feels like the major difference to me. You'd rule him out?

[dom @dom43766942]

@LyfeStiles @thejonstewart @NathanE11 I mean obviously it is risky to use a premium top 10 pick on a guy with major character issues, but it depends on how much weight you put on these recent reports about KT. I don't put much weight on them. Especially since it seems to be a new narrative.

[dom @dom43766942]

@NathanE11 @LyfeStiles Your tweet said Seattle couldn't draft most of those guys with the pick the hawks used on Malik. That isn't relevant because they decided to trade down...and had they not, they could have instead drafted any of the guys I named.

[dom @dom43766942]

@NathanE11 @LyfeStiles TJ and Ram and Tre and Tak we could have gotten had we not traded down. So who is it that we couldn't have gotten?

[dom @dom43766942]

@LyfeStiles @thejonstewart @NathanE11 I think the hawks have been awful at drafting all around for 8 years so we agree there. And while some rated MM higher, I'm just saying there are many really credible analysts that had MM significantly lower. Significantly.

[dom @dom43766942]

@NathanE11 @LyfeStiles What are you talking about? All of those players were available to the Hawks. TJ was there, they traded down instead to get Malik, and all the rest of those guys went after McDowell. So what do you mean they could not have drafted most of those?

[dom @dom43766942]

@NathanE11 @LyfeStiles And you also see very credible mocks and draft boards on https://t.co/qSz1yWUGMF of him being picked in the 60's. You said literally no one said he was a reach and it is factually incorrect. Literally disproven. https://t.co/gAe4kMsmZ8

[dom @dom43766942]

@NathanE11 @LyfeStiles Again, the Hawks could have drafted TJ Watt, Ryan Ramczyk, Tre’Davious White, Budda Baker, Alvin Kamara, JuJu or Tak McKinley. Yet they went with a guy who was 66th on NFL Networks best available board...and you're saying literally no one considered it a reach. Gotcha!

[dom @dom43766942]

@NathanE11 @LyfeStiles He said gifted genetically. And he also said he looked like a 4th round pick in others and had him ranked 66th on his board. So if he has him ranked 66th, yet he was taken 35th... how on earth does that not equate to being a reach? You're delusional.

[dom @dom43766942]

@NathanE11 @LyfeStiles You're literally ignoring the guys final draft rankings and ignoring 90% of what he said in your clip to try to make a point. Dude said he was considered best available. The draft experts NFL Network and ESPN use literally factually publish that he wasn't. But ooook.

[dom @dom43766942]

@LyfeStiles @thejonstewart @NathanE11 Again, its a complete lie that he was considered the best available talent. Draft experts like Mayock had him 66th on his board on draft day. Not 35th. McShay had him similarly. Come on.