"You've hit your usage limit."
Then you burn ten minutes logging in and out of your other accounts trying to find one with anything left in it.
I got tired of that and built headroom.
Every Claude and Codex account you own, on one live dashboard. It reads all of them without spending a single token. The moment one hits a wall, it rotates you to the next account that still has room.
Free. MIT.
How many accounts are you juggling right now?
@omkarships Maybe because most big companies are built on old architecture? I think we need to stop looking at big companies as exemplars for everything.
@10x_er I run both. I keep my own persistent long-running looping agents running in the CLI and run clients in their own GUI. They both have their place.
Twelve days ago I started installing an AI operating system into Mack Brands in Cape Town.
Her name is VANTA.
I'll be building her in public, day by day, including the days she breaks.
@southpolesteve I land on the side of building the truly ambitious stuff because that's what the future is going to make easy. Focusing on the minutiae shrinks your imagination, vision and future potential.
Build a tool-selector skill and combine it with a tool bucket registry. Tools are bucketed by the problems they are most frequently used to solve. The skill looks at the buckets first to determine where the relevant skills live and then only opens the buckets it needs to solve the problem and calls only the tools required. The buckets evolve over time as real problems arise and are solved to make retrieval as efficient as possible.
@zdogmode I believe that the founder of the future is going to BE the product: a malleable engineer harnessing his or her imagination and point of view to deliver value dynamically via multiple mediums.
@contextconor Bots have no capacity to adapt. They follow pre-set instructions every single time with zero capacity for adaption, evolution or context awareness.
@natebjones Isn’t this just a stateful orchestrator agent that manages context over time to understand how best to utilise the agents underneath it to constantly evolve to the operators needs?
@kunchenguid The error is in thinking that static pieces of software have a place in the future. Software is malleable already and will only become more so in the future.
The future isn’t prompt or graph engineering. It’s malleable engineering: adapting as tech evolves, building meta-products that shift with context, not static tools.