Jesus replied, “Truly I tell you, if you have faith and do not doubt, not only can you do what was done to the fig tree, but also you can say to this mountain, ‘Go, throw yourself into the sea,’ and it will be done.
Matthew 21:21
@MoeSbaiti@Polymarket Yeah they're taking that approach. Smart on their part if you ask me but it does benefit us. Hard to say if its for us given it would drive customers away if a mega 7 company got attacked so easily and thats likely their biggest motivation.
@an0nymoustrad3r@ICT_Concepts Guys like me that listen to spaces afterwards thank guys like you for being ahead of me in understanding but not too far to not appreciate it. and therfore asking great questions!!!
@traderMCR@I_Am_The_ICT I hope someone else can chime in to agree or disagree with me but I'm fairly certain 1pFVG is a reference point, just like all the rest of the PDAs. Given it's consolidation and Seek-And-Destroy characteristics going in to 9:30, we're just consolidating in/around it. Not "failed"
@Zbura4@InnerDiscipline I believe month 10? I could be wrong but there's a 2016-2017 core mentorship video that talks (and is only about?) the daily profiles.
@Gagankainthz@I_Am_The_ICT Also, you're on the wrong contract expiration. If you're trying to follow what ICT is watching, he's using NQM2026 (June Exp.). Those REH's are at 24,899,25 on NQM2026. Look at his chart screenshot. OI is higher on June expiration on barchart(.)com
@Ji5yhj6@I_Am_The_ICT i would say that 3:09am was the one you wanted since it was the first fvg after the liquidity taken. You have a mss at 3:10am so thats when I would start looking for the short. Its a fine trade for continuation but within the range Im looking at, it's just a less probable one.
@I_Am_The_ICT Am I the only one that notices that he capitalizes the A in authored? I believe (not sure if its a connection) the only other time he does that is when he speaks of the Lord. I don't try to imagine how he "wrote the code" because it becomes harder to believe but anyone else?
@gabrieln0tgabe@I_Am_The_ICT My screenshots show the difference between the two scenarios. Both open above REHs (including today like you're talking about). Only one open above and closes below REHs all within the 930 opening candle. That is made clear in lecture and the tweet. What do you think?
@gabrieln0tgabe@I_Am_The_ICT You're point is that it opens above REH's and 1st fvg closes bearish. My point for 1pfvg is that when it sweeps REH's, it closes below (REHs) as well: In the lecture example and as stated in the tweet you @'d: "930 opens above then back under AT opening bell". All within 1m. No?
@jakel244@I_Am_The_ICT That's what I saw in video and according to this tweet as well, I'd say its been explicitly stated.
If i'm wrong, I'm wrong but hey we're figuring this out as a community as well. What do you think of this? Im picking on that "above then under"
https://t.co/HjpykzkMQR
When RTH structure has Relative Equal Highs and 9:30am ET opens above then and back under at opening bell... as soon as 9:31am ET candle closes the 9:30am ET candle is 1st P.FVG
@gabrieln0tgabe@I_Am_The_ICT "Above then back under". I did use replay to get back to quickly on my phone but notice the difference. The 930 candle went and above then below the opening (to close). That's not what happened today. What do you think?
@gabrieln0tgabe@I_Am_The_ICT Unless he teaches on it again, I believe it's relative. In his lecture example, the 930 candle traded back into RTH price like a raid THEN left the fvg on the way down. Today is different than his example in my opinion. Ideally he would teach why or why not later today.