Don’t Even

Remember when you were a kid and you could defend your position with ‘It’s a free country.’

[Don’t Even @DontEvenGetMe]

@dirty_drinks @starlinrc @para_streamer @JamesLawler11 @UNMC_ID @unmc @APIC Are these the same physicians that just said cloth masks don’t work after urging the public to wear them for 2 years? Because ... Omicron. I’ll pass on the Shattered Trust Podcast

[Clay Travis @ClayTravis]

Holy hell. Watch it.

[Brian Allen @allenanalysis]

Tyler Robinson’s defense attorneys just told the judge something stunning.

The FBI and ATF claimed Robinson’s DNA was found on the rifle’s trigger, ammunition casings and multiple towels.

The prosecution never turned that evidence over.

Not in physical form.

Not in digital form.

None of it.

Is that because it doesn’t exist?
The attempted assassination of a sitting president.

And the DNA evidence cited in the probable cause statement was never produced.

Questions that deserve answers.

[Murray 🇺🇸 @Rothbard1776]

This isn’t new information, so it’s weird to see the TPUSA crew launch a coordinated media campaign to frame it that way (especially for people accusing others of tainting the jury).

Here’s a question: Where is the handwritten note?

According to the FBI, Lance Twiggs destroyed the note, but (conveniently) happened to take a picture of it before he destroyed it. Then he allegedly gave that picture of the note to the FBI “due to their aggressive interview posture” (Kash Patel’s words).

If Lance destroyed the note because he wanted to bury the evidence, then why would he take (and keep) a picture of it? Seems counterintuitive.

And if Lance did deliberately destroy Robinson’s confession note, then why isn’t he being charged with the destruction of evidence?

And why would Tyler Robinson write a pre-written confession note if when he texted Lance, he told him that he was planning to keep it all a secret until old age? Why would you write a confession note to a crime you were planning to keep a secret? And if he was planning to keep it a secret, why does the article say he also had an auto text confession set up?

Why would Lance Twiggs destroy the confession note, but not delete his text messages when his “boyfriend” Robinson asked him too? Why destroy some pieces of evidence, but not others?

And why would you send a detailed confession to your boyfriend describing every single element of the crime in real-time, when no one in the world knows who you are or thinks you’re a suspect and you’re still in the process of trying to get away with it, if you’ve already written a confession note and set up an auto-text confession ahead of time?

Obviously you can change some of your plans in the heat of the moment if you’re under intense pressure, anxious or feeling guilt after committing a monstrous crime and just need to tell someone (but he did look pretty relaxed and chill when he was hanging out at Dairy Queen waiting on a Blizzard a couple hours later).

I suppose the above isn’t impossible, but it’s another questionable aspect of a crime littered with extremely implausible and/or inexplicable circumstances (at best).

[Aubrey Laitsch @AubreyLaitsch]

@BlakeSNeff — what’s actually most telling here isn’t the attempted insults, it’s the complete refusal to do the one thing that would settle this instantly: release the video.

Instead, we get a long, emotional rant filled with deflection and theatrics. That’s not how someone behaves when the facts are clearly on their side. If the video says what you claim it says, then there’s no reason to keep it hidden. None.

You don’t get to dismiss legitimate questions by smearing people and hoping the noise replaces the evidence. What you are failing to understand is that you are existing in a MINORITY of people, Blake. The vast majority of the general public has questions and they deserve answers.

Stop living in an echo chamber.

At the end of the day, this is simple: either the video backs up your claim, or it doesn’t. And the longer you avoid releasing it, the more obvious the answer becomes.

[Mel @Villgecrazylady]

The fact that they never shared a picture of the bullets should’ve been a giant clue that something was amiss.

[Charlie Kirk @charliekirk11]

This is why people trust Tucker Carlson's reporting more than the whole sum of the legacy news media. He was smeared as a foreign asset for daring to interview Vladimir Putin. How did he respond? He told his critics to pound sand and went back to Russia to get the truth. The enormity of the story demands it.

Tucker Carlson is an AMERICAN national treasure.

[Billboard Chris 🌎 @BillboardChris]

The psychology here is fascinating.

Madeline Mann knows deep down she failed, lied to, and abused her daughter, who now pretends to be male.

She needs society to affirm the lie to prevent herself from breaking.

Beth not only refuses to affirm the lie, but she did what Madeline could not. She saved her own daughter from this cult.

It’s all too much to confront for Madeline, and it broke her. Very sad.

@bourne_beth2345

[Don’t Even @DontEvenGetMe]

@LaurenGruel 👏What supplements do you take when you do this? I want to try!

[Ian Carroll @IanCarrollShow]

@JackPosobiec No you didn’t. You saw a blatant cover up and an official narrative more full of holes than a school in Gaza.

You’ve posted this exact piece of propaganda nearly a dozen times since the hit.

Weren’t you the man’s friend?

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

And to be clear, that means that yes, the surgeon explicitly lied to Andrew Kolvet if he indeed told him that it was a modern day miracle and Charlie’s neck stopped a 30-06.

There was no 30-06 or high powered rifle involved in this at all.

So who was the surgeon?

[Don’t Even @DontEvenGetMe]

@bofrench @TCU Should not be happening at a Christian School!

[Shadow of Ezra @ShadowofEzra]

The mainstream media is finally admitting that the official story of Jeffrey Epstein’s suicide doesn’t add up.

Newly released, never-before-seen photos reveal details that contradict the official reports.

Forensic experts examining the jail cell images say the evidence points to a massive cover-up.

They note the absence of evidence markers and items that appear to have been moved before the investigation even began.

[Murray 🇺🇸 @Rothbard1776]

The most important development yet to drop in the assassination of Charlie Kirk is this clip right here, where @RealCandaceO states that she has multiple sources who claim to have written communications from Charlie the day before he was murdered stating that he thought “they” were going to kill him [with one of those sources being a TPUSA donor]. This would also corroborate the conversation that Infowars news anchor @HarrisonHSmith had [who is not affiliated with TPUSA] one month before Charlie Kirk was killed, where he was told that Charlie thought Israel would kill him if he abandoned the pro-Israel cause [which led to Harrison’s now infamous tweet stating just that back on 8/13/2025].

Candace has no discernible incentive to lie about the existence and veracity of these messages. She already produced the text exchange proving that Charlie was getting intense pressure from his Jewish donors and expressed a desire to abandon the pro-Israel cause just 48 hours before he was killed. This was a fact that everyone in the pro-Israel camp denied for almost a month following Charlie’s death, up to and including Bibi Netanyahu. We now know most of those people were either outright lying or uniformed. In both cases, the existence and verification of those messages by TPUSA spokesman and Executive Producer of the Charlie Kirk Show, Andrew Kolvet, has changed the entire conversation. Why did the people in the group chat or those who knew about Charlie’s evolving views lie about it?

I think there’s a strong possibility that these [alleged] messages will see the light at some point, assuming these individuals aren’t in legitimate fear for their own lives and/or have the courage to come forward. At a minimum, these communications should be provided to law enforcement if they haven’t been already as part of the investigation [assuming the FBI actually plans to conduct a real one]. If so, we may end up seeing them in court.

We know Candace has extensive connections and relationships within the TPUSA network, including with donors, as is evident by the recent letter from @JohnMappin and @ImMappin. To doubt the authenticity of this claim, which she says is in writing from two sources and known by at least 3, would be extremely naive, IMO. It doesn’t make sense for her to lie about this. The liability is far too great.

Given the above, it appears to be almost a certainty that Charlie Kirk thought that there was a possibility he was going to be murdered by pro-Israel forces, at least in part due to the decision he had made to distance himself and TPUSA from the Israeli/Jewish cause.

Now you need to ask yourself, what would make Charlie feel that way? Why would he feel strongly enough about the possibility of being assassinated that he would communicate that in both conversation and in writing, including to at least one TPUSA donor? Bear in mind, confiding in a wealthy donor to the organization about your fear of being killed is no small decision. Did something happen to Charlie that created this fear? It’s logical to ask, was he ever explicitly [or implicitly] threatened? Was he aware of similar things happening to others?

If the above is true … what are the odds he was actually assassinated by a random 22 year-old trans loving furry Zoomer on the following day, on a campus 4 hours away from where Tyler Robinson lived, at a school he wasn’t a student at?

If Charlie’s fears were true and warranted, I think we’d be foolish to ignore them. Who would be in a better position to know “from who” and “why” he could be at risk than Charlie himself? Every thread should be pulled and every stone lifted and turned. Charlie’s memory, family, friends and supporters deserve nothing less.

[Murray 🇺🇸 @Rothbard1776]

To @KanekoaTheGreat

By that same argument, we’re supposed to believe a straight A student who scored in the top 1% on his ACT was stupid enough to send a series of text messages confessing to every single element of the crime:

> Makes his confession [which he hasn’t done to police].
> Confirms the location of the weapon.
> Confirms the type of weapon.
> Confirms he wrapped it in a towel.
> Confirms his motive.
> Exonerates the decoy [George Zinn], whose behavior cannot be rationally explained, even for someone like him. They also found CP on his computer so now he’s silenced & controlled [like with other high profile killings].
> Admits to the bullet engravings.
> Confirms the wardrobe change.
> Confirms how long he’s been planning it.
> Discloses the existence and location of a [now destroyed] pre-written confession note, which the FBI conveniently obtained a picture of due to [and I quote] “our aggressive interview posture”.
> Randomly tells his trans “boyfriend” that his dad is die hard MAGA [as if he wouldn’t already know given the nature of their relationship].
> And is worried about his Dad/Grandpa being upset if he doesn’t come home with the rifle, not the fact that he just used it to commit a murder.

Regarding his proper grammar, I don’t think that’s a red flag like others do, but some of the language used [ie. “Squad car, drop point, swept the area, my vehicle, my old man] is certainly suspicious, especially because some of those are terms used by LE.

You also have to analyze these messages in the overall context of the complete lack of physical/hard evidence linking Tyler Robinson to the shooting [based on what has been presented to the public AT THIS STAGE].

> We don’t have the ballistics report.
> We don’t have confirmation from the FBI that the bullet was recovered.
> We don’t have the autopsy report.
> We don’t have any clear video or photographic evidence of Tyler Robinson carrying the alleged murder weapon on campus.
> We don’t have any clear video or photographic evidence of Tyler Robinson taking the shot. And why did the FBI withhold that part of video before showing someone running and jumping off the roof?
> We don’t have any clear video or photographic evidence that Tyler Robinson was on the roof.
> We don’t have any clear video or photographic evidence that Tyler Robinson was on campus that day. I don’t doubt it, but the photos are too grainy.
> We don’t have the full timeline, including the alleged picture of him casually placing an order inside of a Dairy Queen after the assassination not far from UVU’s campus.

Are those not critically important facts?

And finally, we know that the FBI and other institutions in this country have a long history of corruption. As someone who’s been following and reporting on the events of the past few years, you know this.

We may get more evidence at the trial that convicts Tyler Robinson beyond a reasonable doubt. I’m willing to withhold judgement until that’s the case, but I am very skeptical of anyone who isn’t willing [or intellectually honest enough] to do the same.

I’m not making this allegation right now, but suppose for the sake of argument that the individual(s) who assassinated Charlie Kirk, one of the most influential conservative media and political figures in America [if not the world based purely on his reach] wasn’t some random Zoomer, but rather affiliated with extremely powerful and politically connected entities: be it members of the billionaire donor class, US intel, or [God forbid] a US ally.

What lengths do you think they would go in order to bury that fact and set-up a patsy in order to preserve our institutions or protect our international relationships and allies? Same reason Bill Barr gave the stand down order during Trump’s 1st term.

Do you think this would be the first time that evidence was manufactured to get a conviction in either court or public opinion?

Do you not think there’s still corruption within our FBI/CIA/DOJ, etc.?

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

Kinda weird that Josh Hammer didn’t know where Charlie’s first campus stop was.
He’s been telling everybody that the purpose of the call was to help him prep for the debate. 😩

[Kizma @Kizma1984]

@josh_hammer While you were on the Zoom call did you discuss and find any solutions for this concern of Charlies?

This is an extremely serious problem, right?

[Trisha Hope - National Delegate-TX @JustTheTweets17]

I saw Charlie Kirk assassinated and the crime scene destroyed 4 minutes later.

[Freddy McFeely Rogers @imaChaosAgent]

@AndrewKolvet Yet everything about the assassination is suspicious. If you buy the Man of steel and the 30.06 narrative, you are a gullible fool. Its a shame those who seemed to be closest to Charlie are not demanding the truth. Makes TPUSA seem complicit and that's disappointing

[Don’t Even @DontEvenGetMe]

@AndrewKolvet How long are we going to attempt to curate this crap? WE are NOT Charlie. Charlie was Charlie. 😔

[Trisha Hope - National Delegate-TX @JustTheTweets17]

You know @AndrewKolvet could have just agreed with @RealCandaceO when she said she saw texts that said Charlie was leaving the pro-Israel cause, had he done so the messages wouldn't have been released, but instead he let Candace, Charlie's friend appear a liar.

This is the kind of stuff that tells you what type of character a person has.