After my latest release exposing how these Indian smuggling networks are defrauding the Canadian government and financial system through business loans of up to $250,000, then using the proceeds to flee to America or back to India, one of the main admins/fixers in a group chat I’m in started panicking.
He posted four pictures of my profile and the specific post in the group, called me ethnic slurs, threatened to “fuck my mother,” and complained that the GC was being leaked. 🤣
Realizing that announcing to hundreds of people that the chat had been exposed probably wasn’t great for business, he immediately deleted all four messages.
I reached out to him privately and asked if the group was still safe. He told me, “Yes bro.” I then told him he had been posting a lot, referring to my activity on social media, and he replied:
“No, it doesn’t make any difference.”
In other words, despite my documentary and the extensive evidence documenting their operations, routes, recruitment, and smuggling methods, he seemed completely unconcerned. The routes were apparently still good, and exposing them publicly “makes no difference.”
It’s difficult to interpret this any other way than a network operating with the expectation that they won’t be held accountable, regardless of how much evidence surfaces.
Then, after weeks of consistent leaks and conversations with me, he finally put two and two together.
“I know it’s you.”
“Brother, are you Punjabi?”
“You keep on making a fool out of me.”
I was then removed from the group chat, and they’ve since made it private and scrubbed the invitation link off of their social media pages.
Since then, ads for these smuggling services have begun disappearing from Instagram in large numbers, and some of the most prominent accounts have disappeared as well.
Despite this, the advertisements haven’t disappeared entirely. They’re still operating, because there has been no meaningful crackdown on these networks. Many of the remaining ads are now littered with Canadians and Americans tagging the relevant authorities in the comments, enraged that nothing is being done.
What I find most interesting is that these networks didn’t seem very concerned when we exposed their routes, recruitment, and methods for illegally entering the United States.
But the moment we started exposing how they were exploiting Canada’s financial system and making massive amounts of money, money that bankrolls their smuggling operations and ultimately gets brought into the United States to exploit the American economy, they panicked.
All of this reporting only matters if the American government actually decides to step in and put a stop to these networks. Until then, they’ll continue bringing people across the border by the thousands and exploiting the American economy through fraud and whatever new schemes they come up with next.
You are being scammed.
🔥🚨IT'S JUST ANOTHER GROUNDHOG WEEK IN CANADA🚨🔥
Day 1 - Hint of a Liberal scandal
Day 2 - Proof of a Liberal scandal
Day 3 - Conservatives are outraged
Day 4 - Media downplays
Day 5 - Liberals whitewash
Day 6 - What scandal?
FOLLOWING WEEK:
DIFFERENT SCANDAL, SAME BULLSHIT.
(But don’t be noticing and shit!!)
Hang on.
So Albertans who want a referendum to control their own destiny are “traitors”, but socialist radicals chopping up B.C. and undermining sovereignty, without a mandate, is just Canada as usual?
While Mark Carney was CHAIR of the Board at Brookfield, they backed and invested SHEIN. A Chinese founded “fast fashion” known for alleged and confirmed Child Labour, Slave Labour and other LABOUR concerns. Which now represents a potentially large IPO with ties to CHINA 👀
Liberal MPs who resigned (or announced resignation) since the 2025 election.
👇👇👇👇👇👇
Chrystia Freeland – Jan 9, 2026
(Ran away to Ukraine)
Bill Blair – Feb 2, 2026
(Ran away to the UK)
Jonathan Wilkinson – June 19, 2026
(Ran away as the Ambassador to UN)
Nathaniel Erskine-Smith – July 7, 2026
(Failed as Ontario's Liberal Leadership)
Steven Guilbeault – later summer 2026 (announced May 27)
(Failed Environmental Minister)
Most recent
Shaun Chen (Liberal MP for Scarborough North). - Aug 15, 2026
(Claimed because of a car accident he can not drive to Ottawa even those he traveled to China recently)
To Pierre Poilievre, Leader of the Official Opposition, and to the Citizens of Canada:
Pierre, keep doing your job. That is exactly what the Leader of the Official Opposition is supposed to do: hold the government to account, demand results instead of spin, and refuse to accept managed decline as policy. Your recent letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney on trade—calling for zero tariffs on lumber, steel, aluminum, and autos, an end to further unilateral concessions, and real leverage through Canadian resources—is not obstruction. It is the constitutional duty of opposition in a parliamentary system. Canadians elected you to scrutinize, to press, and to offer a clearer alternative when the government falls short. Do not let media framing or government pushback deter you. That pressure is the point.
To the rest of Canada: we are in serious trouble on the trade and industrial front. American tariffs continue to hammer key sectors. Steel and aluminum face elevated barriers; softwood lumber has seen sharp increases; auto-related trade remains precarious. The federal response has included a string of concessions—dropping the digital services tax, removing retaliatory tariffs, sharing Gordie Howe Bridge toll revenue—while securing only partial or temporary relief at best. The latest $100-million taxpayer-funded rebate to cover half the cost of shipping Canadian steel between provinces is not a solution to lost U.S. market access. It is a domestic stop-gap that effectively admits the problem is expected to persist for up to a year. That is not strategic strength; it is damage control paid for by the public.
Job losses and uncertainty in manufacturing and forestry communities are not abstract. When plants shift production and mills close or curtail, the effects hit real families, real towns, and the broader tax base. Canada sits on vast energy and mineral wealth that could provide genuine negotiating leverage, yet project delays, regulatory layers, and political hesitation have slowed development for years. Treating resource development as something to apologize for rather than a national advantage has left us weaker at the table.
Mark Carney came to office with a reputation as a serious economic manager and a promise of competent handling of the Trump-era trade pressure. Results so far have not matched the rhetoric. Talks continue, a mid-August deadline for additional U.S. tariffs approaches, and the pattern remains one of reactive measures rather than secured, durable, tariff-free access for strategic Canadian industries. “No deal is better than a bad deal” only holds if the status quo itself is not already a bad deal for workers and exporters.
Pierre, continue pressing for a good deal: zero tariffs on the core sectors, an auto arrangement that protects integrated production, exemption from Buy America rules, and the use of Canada’s resource strength as real leverage rather than a bargaining chip given away in advance. Canadians deserve a government that prioritizes outcomes over process and strength over endless accommodation.
This country still has the people, the resources, and the capacity to compete. What it needs right now is leadership that treats those advantages as assets to be developed and defended, not problems to be managed downward. Keep holding the line. The opposition’s job is clear. The government’s performance on this file is not.
Sincerely,
A concerned Canadian
To Pierre Poilievre, Leader of the Official Opposition, and to the Citizens of Canada:
Pierre, keep doing your job. That is exactly what the Leader of the Official Opposition is supposed to do: hold the government to account, demand results instead of spin, and refuse to accept managed decline as policy. Your recent letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney on trade—calling for zero tariffs on lumber, steel, aluminum, and autos, an end to further unilateral concessions, and real leverage through Canadian resources—is not obstruction. It is the constitutional duty of opposition in a parliamentary system. Canadians elected you to scrutinize, to press, and to offer a clearer alternative when the government falls short. Do not let media framing or government pushback deter you. That pressure is the point.
To the rest of Canada: we are in serious trouble on the trade and industrial front. American tariffs continue to hammer key sectors. Steel and aluminum face elevated barriers; softwood lumber has seen sharp increases; auto-related trade remains precarious. The federal response has included a string of concessions—dropping the digital services tax, removing retaliatory tariffs, sharing Gordie Howe Bridge toll revenue—while securing only partial or temporary relief at best. The latest $100-million taxpayer-funded rebate to cover half the cost of shipping Canadian steel between provinces is not a solution to lost U.S. market access. It is a domestic stop-gap that effectively admits the problem is expected to persist for up to a year. That is not strategic strength; it is damage control paid for by the public.
Job losses and uncertainty in manufacturing and forestry communities are not abstract. When plants shift production and mills close or curtail, the effects hit real families, real towns, and the broader tax base. Canada sits on vast energy and mineral wealth that could provide genuine negotiating leverage, yet project delays, regulatory layers, and political hesitation have slowed development for years. Treating resource development as something to apologize for rather than a national advantage has left us weaker at the table.
Mark Carney came to office with a reputation as a serious economic manager and a promise of competent handling of the Trump-era trade pressure. Results so far have not matched the rhetoric. Talks continue, a mid-August deadline for additional U.S. tariffs approaches, and the pattern remains one of reactive measures rather than secured, durable, tariff-free access for strategic Canadian industries. “No deal is better than a bad deal” only holds if the status quo itself is not already a bad deal for workers and exporters.
Pierre, continue pressing for a good deal: zero tariffs on the core sectors, an auto arrangement that protects integrated production, exemption from Buy America rules, and the use of Canada’s resource strength as real leverage rather than a bargaining chip given away in advance. Canadians deserve a government that prioritizes outcomes over process and strength over endless accommodation.
This country still has the people, the resources, and the capacity to compete. What it needs right now is leadership that treats those advantages as assets to be developed and defended, not problems to be managed downward. Keep holding the line. The opposition’s job is clear. The government’s performance on this file is not.
Sincerely,
A concerned Canadian
The Carney Liberals gave you the highest food inflation among our peer countries in the G7.
And now, they’ll only make it worse by closing a key research farm that supports Canada’s food security.
Local champions like @NovaScotiaESM are fighting back.
INVESTIGATION: Pyramid firm caught playing both sides of Canada student scheme, leading to hunger strike chaos, potential deportations, and untold sums of cash for immigration.
Details in the comments.
Nobody talks about how "utilities" are no longer regulated. Your electric bill doubled, your water bill tripled, and there's nothing you can do because it's a private monopoly. They privatized the public good, eliminated competition, and now charge whatever they want.
CBC IS FINALLY EXPLAINING TO THE ELBOWS UP CROWD WHAT CONSERVATIVES HAVE BEEN SCREAMING FOR 18 MONTHS. 🇨🇦
Canada sends roughly 75% of its exports to the United States.
The U.S. sends only 16% of its exports to Canada.
Maybe when CBC is explaining the basic arithmetic of Canada-U.S. trade to the ELBOWS UP crowd, the fantasy has finally reached its expiration date.
The question is how much economic damage Canada suffers before everyone else realizes it too.
🇨🇦 While much of the media treats Carney’s Italy vacation like an Expedia itinerary, she asked the obvious political question:
Why this week?
More Canadian TV needs @KatlynHarrison.
Canada is in a high-stakes trade fight with its largest customer. His government is reportedly discussing concessions. Entire industries are waiting to learn what comes next.
And the Prime Minister is in Italy.
Maybe there’s a perfectly reasonable explanation.
Then ask the damn question.
That’s journalism.
Then the former Trudeau adviser comes on afterward and you’re reminded why Canadians increasingly distrust political panels:
One person asks whether the government’s behaviour makes sense.
The other explains why you shouldn’t worry about it.
Analysis vs access journalism.
We need a lot more of the first. 🇨🇦
🚨BREAKING:
On July 28th I filed a GRAMA request for the text audit trail of Officer Christopher Bagley’s body cam from the day @charliekirk11 was shot at UVU — not the video, just the metadata (power on/off, recording start/stop, manual deactivations, GPS + timestamps, system alerts).
UVU denied it, claiming that releasing a simple body‑cam log would “jeopardize the security of public property, buildings, or systems” and could “interfere with enforcement proceedings” or “deprive a person of a right to a fair trial” because of the ongoing case.
If this was a clean, open‑and‑shut “lone shooter” story, the audit trail should help prove it.
Instead, they’re treating body‑cam metadata like classified state secrets. 😭
Ask yourself why.
If the State had nothing to hide, wouldn’t the metadata be their friend? 🧐
This is one of the major reasons Pierre has attracted so many young people to our party.
Young working Canadians know that Carney’s policies mean they may never achieve the dream of home ownership.
They deserve the same quality of life as their parents and Conservatives are fighting for them!