@VaughnWest61 @Agape_OSULA@PeteGClark@CapThunderpunch@POTUS Luck is certainly involved, but it also involves skill and effort usually--especially skill in avoiding paying out money, like taxes. Given their tax rate is indeed very high, why aren't they paying "their fair share" now? Because they always find a loophole.
@RichEffects@Agape_OSULA @VaughnWest61 @PeteGClark@CapThunderpunch@POTUS While that's a problem, incentives for companies to pay laborers more (a nice fat corporate tax deduction for companies that pay their people at 200% of minimum wage) makes more sense than taxing billionaires more. But the government wants money, not for us to have more money.
@Agape_OSULA @VaughnWest61 @PeteGClark@CapThunderpunch@POTUS I just don't care. Taking more billionaire money isn't going to make my life, or anybody's life (except perhaps a few government bureaucrats) life any better, at all. It's not going to improve the country or pay down debt. It's a debate about something that does not matter.
@VaughnWest61 @Agape_OSULA@PeteGClark@CapThunderpunch@POTUS Why do we care? Any 25% tax on billionaires isn't going to improve the quality of life for your average American at all, or even begin to pay down our debt, and whatever money would be raised--if any--would not end up in the citizen's pocket, or community.
@Agape_OSULA@PeteGClark@CapThunderpunch@POTUS I define "fair share" is how much I need to live my life however I want to, without doing anything to deserve it. I also want my fair share!
@PeteGClark@CapThunderpunch@POTUS I really think that's dependent. If the government is a responsible steward of our money, and the country, then a significant share is justified.
The government is not a responsible steward of our money. I think a flat tax of about 1% would be "fair" for our bloated government.
@GlutonousPig @abcd3fgh1jkl3 @princessSunrey@rick_anthony52@PeteGClark@POTUS National parks and roads aren't waste. Generally. While there is waste involved in the expenditures (road projects moreso than national parks), at least we get something good out of it. I expect we could save a trillion a year but reducing middle-management within the bureaucracy
@princessSunrey@PeteGClark@POTUS ... but the majority of money the government spends does not go to improving anything for anybody, except a select few that now how to work the system (individuals and corporations). Alas! Would be nice, though. And I do indeed enjoy the roads.
@princessSunrey@PeteGClark@POTUS More of our money is spent funding an intractable an ineffective bureaucracy that exists only to perpetuate itself than is spent on roads. I don't object in principal to everyone putting something in the pot for nice roads (and dams, and national parks, and space exploration) ...
@Nater680@Girldad38031589@PeteGClark @JaredEakle @POTUS That said, most "tax the rich" talk is a smokescreen to suck money out of the middle-class. Somehow there's not a "tax the rich" proposal that doesn't end up costing the middle-class significantly more as a percentage of purchasing power, in any number of ways.
@Nater680@Girldad38031589@PeteGClark @JaredEakle @POTUS I don't particularly care if the rich pay a little bit more or a little bit less, because either way it's going to make no difference to the country at large and will not really change the real problem, which is government spending and waste.
@PeteGClark@POTUS If the government spent the money responsibly, we certainly would need to raise any taxes, but we'd be hugely better off. Alas, gone are the days with the government built interstates and dams and bridges and National Park lodges and did other productive things with our money.
@alyssa_merc@dtv20 Interestingly, that's the kind of language racists have used to excuse or deny their own racism historically. A coincidence, I'm sure!
The fundamental problem, though, is that the games featuring Sweet Baby "consultancy" have been uniformly awful, and most of them flops if not actively resulting in bankruptcy for the company employing them. Woke or not, the games SB has a hand in seem to be unappealing to gamers
PC Gamer put out an article defending Sweet Baby and it sucks even harder than the Kotaku one
It lies even more blatantly and misrepresents people's contentions with Sweet Baby even harder than Kotaku did, which is something I didn't think was possible 🧵
@MattWalshBlog If Iger had left a few years ago and handed the reins over to Lasseter, I believe this would be an entirely different story (in the films, but also in the company's financials).
@MattWalshBlog I was excited about Disney taking over Star Wars when it was first announced. Seriously excited. But I was thinking about Toy Story 3, The Incredibles, even Tangled. A little Tron Legacy. That was the Disney I was thinking of. I was tragically mistaken.
@MattWalshBlog OMG. What sort of benefit must there be to Iger and company to not just torch a franchise the spent $4b on but just burn money, pointlessly? It would be more profitable to them to just not make any more Star Wars at this point. I don't understand what they are thinking.
@GlobalMediaCEO @RashidaTlaib@POTUS A: Where is the evidence that any of this is true?
B: If they could get to the Egypt/Gaza border, Egypt would not let them in. Egypt has made that perfectly and very publicly clear.