this guy

me

[this guy @dospulgars]

I wonder if Dennis had a heart attack from looking at AI porn? For now, that's what I'm going to assume.

[this guy @dospulgars]

@Teena78 @neeva_walters @MastersSeminary You've misunderstood. Neeva knows, in fact, she aggressively and repeatedly claims to know, what's going on.

Then she acts ignorant & asks questions that aren't sincere. She knows the answer; she's a deceiver.

[this guy @dospulgars]

The fruits of being perpetually aggrieved. And when you don't rely on God for justice, but claim the authority to mete it out on your terms--this is the result.

[this guy @dospulgars]

@neeva_walters I see now that you weigh Scripture differently. Some of God's Word is more sacred to you than other parts. Some of it is optional, to be followed only if you believe the situation warrants it.

You've decided God wasn't right, and you can improve on His Word. Shameful blasphemy.

[this guy @dospulgars]

@neeva_walters So now reading God's Word and obeying it is weaponizing it?

Moreover, your characterization is all wrong. No one is attempting to dismiss accusations against Jung.

The accusations you've made against Rodney are the focus; stop conflating the issues.

[this guy @dospulgars]

@neeva_walters Why are you asking me that question? You've already assumed you know the answer, in fact, telling the world you know my position on the issue.

But you don't know. You don't get to backtrack now and act like you've come to me in good faith. What you've done is evil.

[this guy @dospulgars]

Absolutely wicked of you, Neeva. And a lie.

I never said anything about it being normal or ok.

I simply noted that Rodney's deposition is at odds with the characterization of the same event in the lawsuit.

You're absolutely wicked, and you owe me an apology.

[this guy @dospulgars]

@defundthedmv I guess you'll need to rewrite 1 Timothy 5:19 then, since you're determined to bring a charge against an elder on the basis of a single witness.

[this guy @dospulgars]

@defundthedmv It's not tough to see. My rebuke started with a violation of 1 Timothy 5:19 on Neeva's part.

There aren't multiple witnesses that support the totality of the lawsuit's claims against certain GCC elders; at dispute is exactly what was known and when.

[this guy @dospulgars]

@defundthedmv Wouldn't mind if you'd recant that bit about me advocating for Jung. That is a lie.

Only if you twist and contort what I've said, add what you've assumed, and draw all the wrong conclusions can you possibly think that.

[this guy @dospulgars]

@defundthedmv You're right, you've assumed and you don't understand. Best if you just leave it at that.

[this guy @dospulgars]

@defundthedmv Again, you've completely misunderstood.

No one here is trying to absolve Jung. Do better, or don't weigh in.

[this guy @dospulgars]

@defundthedmv So you're just gonna stick with the lie that I've advocated for him.

The truth is not in you.

[this guy @dospulgars]

@defundthedmv You're believing lies you've concocted. Is that a description more to your liking?

At no point have I advocated for Jung. It's wicked and deceitful for you to explicitly state that I have.

Read better.

[this guy @dospulgars]

@neeva_walters No one is normalizing it. There's a dispute about what actually occurred and how much was known about what actually occurred (and when).

And since you don't understand that, it's clear you are (again) talking about things you don't understand.

[this guy @dospulgars]

@neeva_walters Entirely deceitful. You are wicked.

[this guy @dospulgars]

@neeva_walters @raskolnehkov I didn't make you anything; you've choose to repeatedly antagonize. You're incredibly proud of your antagonism, believing it to be ordained and approved of by God.

You boast of your antagonism.

[this guy @dospulgars]

@neeva_walters @raskolnehkov In a VERY different context and description than the lawsuit claims. Surely you aren't that obtuse.

[this guy @dospulgars]

@neeva_walters @raskolnehkov And that is your (frequently repeated) mistake. You think that you know how I feel or think about that case, despite the fact that I've only rendered an opinion on YOUR behavior.