Health Canada knew of mRNA vaccine heart risks before rollout, and now young Canadians face the consequences
Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada were aware of myocarditis and pericarditis risks linked to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines before granting interim approval to Pfizer in December 2020, internal records confirm.
Yet as cases of heart failure climb among previously healthy young Canadians, legacy media outlets and so-called ‘experts’ alike report and comment on the trend without mentioning the well-documented signal.
Last week, CTV highlighted a Canadian Cardiovascular Society and Canadian Heart Failure Society release warning of a “perfect storm” driving higher diagnoses in adults aged 20 to 40.
Cardiologist Dr. Margot Davis noted the increase at specialized clinics, yet the coverage conveniently omitted any reference to COVID-19 vaccination, despite documented risks to heart health.
A parliamentary Order Paper response (Q-766) reveals that the first Canadian report of myocarditis or pericarditis following an mRNA injection arrived on December 4, 2020 — that’s five days before Health Canada’s interim authorization of Pfizer’s vaccine on December 9.
That safety signal continued to mount throughout the rollout, the official parliamentary response shows.
As of January 26, 2026, Health Canada’s Canada Vigilance Program has logged 2,040 domestic and 29,619 foreign reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination.
Despite early warning signs, public warnings did not appear until closer to June 2021.
Internal documents obtained through access-to-information requests and compiled by medical and regulatory investigator Natasha Gonek paint a very clear picture: minutes from the federal Vaccine Vigilance Working Group (records never intended for public release) show myocarditis and pericarditis were tracked as priorities from December 2020 onward.
A December 17, 2020, Record of Discussion (ROD) noted that information on myocarditis, pericarditis and thrombotic disorders would be posted online the week of December 21. Despite the seriousness of these risks, that information remained largely buried from public view.
Ontario data analyst Kelly Brown identified sharp increases in risk of heart inflammation, primarily among young males, after examining provincial safety signals in early 2021.
Other provincial figures and federal monitoring systems told the same story, while Public Health Agency of Canada employees sat on surveillance teams co-authoring studies cited by the department as evidence of safety.
Meanwhile, the public received heavily narrative-controlled propaganda intended to preserve the ‘safe and effective’ marketing mantra at all costs.
A Privy Council Office memo titled “Testing Behaviourally-Informed Messaging In Response To Severe Adverse Events Following Immunization” explicitly discussed managing public confidence in COVID-19 vaccination efforts.
Officials tested language designed to emphasize rarity and preserve trust, rather than to disclose the mounting age- and sex-specific risks.
Canadians were repeatedly told that adverse events are rare and that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the unknown risks.
Today, some of the young people who were sold this narrative five years ago are now appearing in heart-failure clinics, unable to walk more than a few feet without debilitating exhaustion.
This raises alarming, and still very pertinent, questions about the COVID response, such as why early signals were so severely downplayed, whether age- and sex-specific risks were truly communicated transparently, and what follow-up exists for those diagnosed with vaccine-associated myocarditis?
Legacy media’s continued silence on the documented timeline only serves to deepen public distrust in institutions that aided in ‘the science is settled’ narrative.
The receipts — from internal records, parliamentary answers, and surveillance data — have been available for years, yet the subject remains so taboo that much of the legacy media and expert class still refuse to confront it openly.
REPORT by @TamaraUgo
📉 Well, what do we have here? Merck’s sales for its HPV vaccine Gardasil have reportedly dropped 40%.
“They’ve lost 40% of their sales for Gardasil because people talk.”
“People are getting the message that this is a bad vaccine.”
“There’s no proof that it has prevented any cervical cancer.”
“We’ve proven lots of cases of autoimmune disorder, of POTS disorder, and of death from the Gardasil shot.”
The truth can only be hidden for so long.
@CHDTVLive@maryhollandnyc
Very good news!
I asked @PierrePoilievre what he plans to do as Prime Minister of Canada about the abuse of child transition.
He was more clear than he’s ever been in vowing to stop it!
Robert Kennedy Jr. wants to do the most basic thing science can do - compare the health outcomes of vaccinated children to unvaccinated children using the largest medical database in America.
That's it. That's the study. That's the scientific method.
And the American Academy of Pediatrics is suing him to stop it.
Think about what that means. Not content with blocking changes to the vaccine schedule, they are now going to court to prevent an investigation into whether the schedule is actually producing healthy children. The one question the entire program should have been answering for fifty years, and the people who run that program are fighting in federal court to make sure it never gets asked.
This is an industry protecting itself from its own data.
I am not accusing anyone in medicine of malice. I am saying that the long-term health investigation has never been done with the seriousness it deserves, and now that someone is finally trying to do it, there is a worldwide effort to shut it down before it starts.
We have to do this study. We have databases right now, like the Henry Ford Health database, that could give us real answers. Every database in this country should be opened to this investigation. The scientific method demands it. The health of our children demands it.
The only people who have something to fear from the truth are the ones fighting this hard to hide from it.
https://t.co/W04GZu2OZB
@bruce_barrett@Melanie54333723 I live 3 hrs from there, rural area. Teens here will not work in restaurants, grocery stores. They want mon-Fri 9-5. These things are below them.
Why is this not on everyone’s mind daily?
@elonmusk: “It's pretty wild that a tiny tax on tea started the Revolution, and now we get the living daylights taxed out of us and there's no revolution…"