@NyansanyaKevin@DuchessTalitha Yes. I know people who were indirectly forced. You dont attend this nonsense, then no seeds and fertiliser for you this season. They say it.
@LynneStactia@Machuma123456 Are they not the same lecturers who where striking for better salaries? They were saying they get about $300 a month๐คท๐ฟโโ๏ธ
What an uncaptured people's parliament would have done when they heard that President Munangagwa has pledged $2 million dollars to Makandiwa's UFIC church. Let's reclaim our constitution and our country @advocatemahere@Cde_Ostallos@BitiTendai@freemanchari@daddyhope
I donโt know if Mthuli Ncube, Mnangagwa and those advocating for investment in Zimbabwe realises that just this video alone, hurts the prospects of getting foreign investment more than anything.
You can cook books & do everything you else you want but this video alone gives the world a true picture of where we are, it touches on our banking system, our legislation, rule of law & money laundering. All in one video.
Government has conceded that Parliament made a series of major changes to CAB3 as it passed through the legislative process, but insists that the amendments were lawful & did not trigger the need for a fresh 90-day public consultation process.
Read more:
https://t.co/A2S97B4Nix
@RobsonNyasha@jahman_adamski What have blacks done to their black brothers & sisters? Suppress then, hurt, loot, kill and deprived them human dignity ๐ฎ๐ฎ๐ฎ๐ฎ
People are entitled to disagree with @BMutebuka Mutebuka, @nelsonchamisa or anyone else. They can challenge their arguments, question their political positions and demand evidence. That is part of political discourse, and nobody should be above scrutiny.
But repeatedly reducing someone to nicknames such as โTemu Magaisaโ does not strengthen an argument. It simply turns political disagreement into personal ridicule. Brighton can be right, wrong, irritating, provocative or completely mistaken but challenge what he says and the positions he takes. There is no need to belittle the person.
The same applies to Chamisa. You donโt have to support him, and you certainly donโt have to agree with his interpretation of events. But constantly attacking his character instead of engaging with the substance of the issues is not healthy political debate either.
Yes, social media can be a โhard-hat areaโ, and robust exchanges are part of the territory. But that should never become an excuse for abandoning basic civility. A divergent opinion is not a personal invitation to attack the person holding it.
What concerns me is when legitimate political disagreements are repeatedly turned into personal mockery and name calling. At that point, we are no longer debating ideas we are simply trying to diminish people through character assassination.
Challenge the argument. Challenge the politics. Produce the evidence. Expose inconsistencies. But leave the personal attacks out of it.
Zimbabwe needs more robust debate, not more dehumanisation. We can disagree passionately without trying to destroy one another. ๐๐พ