Burnham and the Pakistani Rape Gang Cover Up
Part 7
Burnham Now Backs the Inquiry He Spent Years Blocking
Andy Burnham, the Mayor of Greater Manchester, commissioned an Assurance Review into the gang rape of children in Oldham. It was a sham. Maggie Oliver described it as 'nothing short of a cover up'. He used its findings to argue that no further inquiry was necessary.
He stood by that position for years while survivors and campaigners documented its failures. He resisted the national inquiry and argued against it, presenting himself as the man who had done what needed to be done.
He could not sustain this position indefinitely. The national inquiry was forced onto the agenda by people he could not suppress, the people of Oldham, Maggie Oliver, the survivors who refused to stay silent, and eventually an audience online that the metropolitan elite in the mainstream media could not reach to manage. The political ground shifted under him.
When blocking stopped working, he moved to set the ceiling. In January 2025 he told BBC Radio Manchester he backed a limited national inquiry, one that would draw on the reviews he had commissioned and compel people to give evidence.
The power to compel evidence was the single thing his reviews could never do. He knew this from the start yet he had spent years presenting those reviews as enough. In one sentence he conceded their fatal flaw and proposed that the new inquiry be built on the discredited work rather than sent to examine it.
Limited meant using Burnham's reviews as the foundation and never the subject. A limited inquiry draws out national themes and leaves local culpability where it lies. He was defining the inquiry small before anyone with authority could define it large. The man who had blocked it for years had stepped forward to bound it.
He then rebuked critics of the inquiry's chair in public and told them to stop reading politics into it. The instruction came from the politician with the most direct personal interest in what the inquiry is allowed to find. His entire approach to the rape gangs has been to manage the politics of accountability rather than deliver it.
Throughout the Makerfield campaign he has leaned on the Hillsborough families, presenting himself to those voters as the man who fights the establishment for the truth. He is the establishment. The national inquiry did not happen seven years earlier because of him, at a point when he could have demanded it from a position of genuine authority and forced a government to comply.
Instead he spent those years producing processes he knew could not work. When their conclusions were weaponised he defended them. Anyone who said otherwise he attacked and his allies condemned as conspiracy theorists.
When Makerfield positioned him for a Labour leadership run, the message changed. Accountability started to matter. The national inquiry he had spent years resisting turned into a cause he supported, and institutional failure was suddenly something he wanted to be seen confronting. The ambition stayed the same throughout. The message adjusted around it.
This is repositioning. The women whose childhoods were destroyed in Oldham and across Greater Manchester can tell the difference between a politician who changed his mind and one who jumped on a bandwagon to save his skin.
Central to the Cover-Up
Despite their best efforts to present alternative findings, the review vindicated every substantive allegation I had made before it began. Each case study it examined confirmed the gang rape of little girls. Every structural failure it identified was one I had already documented and published.
The institutions named faced no consequences. The men who ran them stayed in post. The politicians who had built the conditions for the cover-up stayed in theirs.
I want to be precise about the mainstream media. The silence is deliberate. The journalists exist who could sit Burnham down with this evidence and demand a response. None has done it with his record in any sustained or systematic way, because doing so would expose how far the establishment, across politics, policing and the press, knew what was happening to Working-class White girls in towns like Oldham and chose silence as the cheapest response.
Burnham is the establishment's preferred candidate for the Labour leadership. He is the face they want on the next version of the party. That is why the protection exists and why the questions do not get asked. Asking them would damage more than Burnham. It would damage the entire apparatus that managed the cover-up and now manages the narrative around the inquiry.
The response to my work, when it has come at all, amounts to one thing. Someone once asked Burnham directly which part of what I had said was untrue. His answer was about Shaun Fielding's girlfriend getting a job at his office. I had apparently said he arranged it, and that specific detail was contested. That was his answer. That is the full extent of the factual challenge he has been able to mount against eight years of documented investigative work of the cover up of the gang rape of little girls.
The would be Prime Minister of the United Kingdom commissioned a review that could not compel the truth.
The morning his review appeared, his party used it to call the people telling the truth liars, and he watched that happen in silence. Maggie Oliver's resignation letter reached him in January 2025 and he said nothing. He created the conditions for the IOPC to close the Augusta investigation without accountability, then called the outcome inadequate. Victoria Agoglia's grandmother was promised a second inquest. It was not delivered.
The cover-up of the industrial-scale grooming and gang rape of working-class White girls is the biggest institutional cover-up this country has ever seen. Andy Burnham's chapter in it is central. He had the power and the knowledge to demand the tools that could have extracted the truth, and the political understanding to know exactly what he was choosing instead. He dug the deepest grave the truth has ever had and called it an investigation.
The national inquiry is now underway. Oldham is one of its first areas of examination. Whatever it finds, it will be finding it despite Andy Burnham, not because of him.
He will not meet me. He threatens and then goes silent. He runs from doorstep cameras. To the simple question he has no answer. Show me which words of mine is untrue Andy. I dare you.
_________
I’m Raja Miah MBE. For seven years, I led a campaign that exposed how senior Labour politicians helped protect Pakistani rape gangs. The people of my town EXPOSED ANDY BURNHAM and helped force the national inquiry.
You won’t see me on the BBC. You won’t read my work in the legacy press. That’s not an accident. I take this to a place from where there is no coming back.
All of my work is 100% free. There are no paywalls to access any of my content. I just ask those that can afford to do so to support me.
Either with a subscription to my newsletter;
👉 https://t.co/mZBZnScays
Or by a one off contribution and buying me a coffee using one of these links.
👉 https://t.co/vKOkBi7jwg
👉 https://t.co/6dcoa4lJeS
Please stand with me. We will not secure justice without your help.
Raja 🙏
@JeremyClarkson@realninawysocka Hope you have spoken to prof Angus dalgleish and looked into ivermectin & fenbendazole. You will need to name drop to get past his secretary !
🚨 This might be the most saved Ivermectin and Fenbendazole chart on X right now.
Dr. William Makis' ivermectin and fenbendazole dosage framework for cancer.
✅Low dose.
✅Medium dose.
✅High dose.
✅Very high dose.
All in one chart.
This is the chart thousands of people keep referencing when researching ivermectin, fenbendazole, and mebendazole protocols.
It also includes the dosing frequency and timing as well for better context.
If you're researching ivermectin, fenbendazole, or mebendazole and looking for a trusted source, @genixmeds provides products from cGMP and WHO certified manufacturers with worldwide delivery and real human support when you need it.
#Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #CancerProtocol
🚨🚨 A survey of doctors revealed that 88.3% of physicians would reject chemotherapy for their own cancer treatment...
The 5-year survival rate with chemotherapy is only 2.1%, yet most oncologists only offer the "Standard of Care" to patients.
Dr. Seyfried would choose the Ivermectin and Fasting Protocol.
The Board of Directors of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has data showing that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer, even though they recommend chemo and radiation as the only "approved" treatment to their patients.
MacKillop and colleagues discovered that in a survey of Canadian doctors treating lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis.
Lind and colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston and found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer.
"The Contribution of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy to 5-Year Survival in Adult Malignancies" cites... The overall contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the U.S.
Cancer treatment is a multi-billion-dollar industry.
The system profits more from lifelong chemo and radiation than from natural intervention.
Chemotherapy is not the answer for healing the body of cancer.
Glucose-Ketone Index GKI and Cancer Eradication Based on Otto Warburg's Revolutionary Research:
Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible and cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells.
A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose and increases ketone production. This deprives cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source.
Research shows that a low-glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells and T cells to become even stronger, which are crucial for killing cancer.
Chemotherapy and radiation actually kill our Natural Killer NK cells, allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment
Today, I’m releasing never before seen intelligence revealing new evidence of past US government funding for more than 120 biolabs in over 30 countries, including Ukraine.
In support of President Trump‘s Executive Order to end federal funding of dangerous gain of function research around the world, and increase transparency and accountability, ODNI will continue working with partners across the Administration to identify where these labs are, what pathogens they contain, and what “research” is being conducted.
https://t.co/pLMD0krc69
Have a listen to the nature of the "Henry VIII Powers" the state awards itself to exempt MPs and the rest of the puppets from the online surveillance they impose on us ...
Here we go !
I was told by a US Special forces colonel 4 years ago that 5G could be pulsed at a frequency to cause bleeding from all orifices of the human body - simulating symptoms of the Ebola/ Marburg virus.
Look at what is being prepared for now !
@ABridgen What I don’t get is Trumps disgust in Starmer re free speech when Starmer is obviously an establishment patsie.. the biggest U.K. establishment oligarchs are the Rothschilds…. Thats why this statement says so much …..they are all in it together…
‼️Candace Owens Exposes That It's REALLY The Rothschilds That WANT The Island Off Albania—Ivanka And Jared Are Merely AGENTS Of The Rothchilds. 👀
In tonight’s episode, Candace Owens went deeper into the Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner island story — and revealed that the boat Ivanka was supposedly “swimming” off of when she “discovered” the island actually belonged to Nat Rothschild.
Candace mocked Ivanka’s spiritual, barefoot, “Adam and Eve” story, pointing out that they were actually on one of the most expensive superyachts in the world — complete with helicopters, jet skis, elevators, and a helipad that doubles as a basketball court.
But according to Candace, this isn’t about luxury real estate. She claims the real reason the Rothschilds are pushing for this island (and others) is strategic control — referencing old Soviet comments about how controlling that area would allow them to dominate the entire Mediterranean.
She tied it all together with the bigger picture: control of waterways, oil, and global resources — from the Strait of Hormuz to Gibraltar — and accused Jared and Ivanka of acting as agents for that agenda.
This one goes deep.
FOLLOW @RealCandaceO, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below. 👇
⚠️My channel is under attack to try to bankrupt me. If you want to support me and help me keep exposing these losers...
Donate here:🔗 https://t.co/zvJN5mIrhp
@RealCandaceO ▶️Rothschild fam runs Epstein Island
▶️Rothschild fam created modern israel
▶️Charlie Kirk called out Epstein and then he left the pro isreal cause
▶️Rothschilds got Kirk
Basic logic
Joe Kennedy (JFK’s father) said “as far as I’m concerned we lost world war 2. The Jews and the Rothschilds won. They are in control of this country. Right now my primary concern is getting my son Jack elected president of the United States. I’m gonna get him elected, but I’m gonna have to play ball with the Jews to do it. But when we get in there we will start making the move against them.”
This story is a from a nationalist source Dewest Hooker, who later relayed it to
Michael Collins Piper. It cannot be directly sourced from documents, but based on what we know about the Kennedys, Piper, and Hooker there is no reason to downvote by this story.
🚨 PUTIN DELIVERS A DEVASTATING BLOW TO THE ROTHSCHILDS - “Our Future Generations Will Be Born Without Rothschild Chains Around Their Wrists And Ankles.” A HISTORIC STRIKE AGAINST THE GLOBALIST FINANCIAL EMPIRE
🔥 BOOM! Putin breaks the Rothschild chains! Russia becomes the first nation to expel the global banking cartel, defying the New World Order and reclaiming sovereignty. Discover the explosive details of how Putin crushed the elite’s financial stranglehold. This is a revolution in the making—don’t miss it!
🔥 Putin’s Explosive Blow to Rothschilds: “Future Generations Will Be Born Without Chains!”
FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING.