Kat

genuine faith in JESUS + nothing = SALVATION ➡ resulting to good works ☀ Ephesians 2:8-9 ☀

[marvièn @mvn_dn]

using medicines as an excuse to pocket 40 million when there are real people in this country suffering without healthcare…

[POGANDA 🌸📸 @poganda_daily]

eto na yata pinaka masakit na "tala" edit na napanuod ko 💔

[Inquirer @inquirerdotnet]

‘HINDI TAYO NAGBABAKASAKALI LANG’

Akbayan Rep. and House prosecutor Chel Diokno provided full context for his remarks on the alleged "fishing expedition" during the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte. Diokno represented the House prosecution panel during the oral arguments on the request to subpoena Duterte's financial records, which the Senate impeachment court granted.

His statement came after Akbayan Party-list called out Senator-Judge Pia Cayetano for sharing a "spliced" video clip of Diokno's exchange with Senator-Judge Alan Peter Cayetano during the trial. The post carried the caption: "Nagbabakasakali lang? Walang mga ebidensya pero nagaakusa na!"

“Saan ka nakakita ng judge na tino-troll online ang prosecution? Sino ngayon ang one-sided?” Akbayan stated. #VPonTrial

READ RELATED STORY: https://t.co/0vG2gQj6XD

[Chel Diokno @ChelDiokno]

Stonehill vs. Diokno, ano yun?

Sa impeachment trial kahapon, nabanggit ang isang landmark case na may kinalaman sa aking ama, si Sen. Jose W. Diokno.

Panoorin ito para sa buong kwento. Ipapaliwanag rin natin kung may kaugnayan ito sa subpoena para sa mga dokumento ni VP Sara.

Anong say ninyo rito? Mag-comment lang kayo at mag-follow for more updates sa impeachment.

[Jesus Falcis 🇵🇭 @jesusfalcis]

🚨 Sen. Kiko Pangilinan correctly points out that having a high trust rating does not mean BP Sara cannot be impeached.

I would argue further that the higher the trust rating, the greater the betrayal of public trust and greater the need to impeach.

👊

#ConvictSara

[… @johnat143]

This is a must watch.

Dito mo makikita bakit si Diokno ang dapat nasa Senado at hindi Cayetano.

[Emil @13thFool]

Watching @ChelDiokno’s exemplary performance sa impeachment trial, hindi ko pa rin maisip kung bakit nating sinayang ang taong ‘to. Pero I’m hopeful that someday, magiging ready rin tayo sa kanya. Sabi nga sa Jollibee, “willing to wait.” #PambamsangMulto

[Richard Heydarian @RichHeydarian]

Dean DIOKNO restoring my faith in our legislature single-handedly!!!

[Chel Diokno @ChelDiokno]

Confidentiality cannot trump accountability. Sang-ayon ba kayo?

Ngayong araw, inaprubahan ng impeachment court ang ating hiling na ipa-subpoena ang mga bank records, tax records, at AMLC reports kaugnay ni VP Sara Duterte at ng kanyang asawa.

Mahalaga ito sa usapin ng unexplained wealth. Ayon sa Korte Suprema, kailangang ihambing ang yaman ng isang opisyal noong una siyang pumasok sa gobyerno laban sa lahat ng perang pumasok sa kanyang mga accounts sa nakalipas na mga taon. Dito malalaman kung tugma ba ang kanyang lehitimong kinikita sa aktwal na yaman niya.

Umaasa tayo sa tuluyang paglabas ng lahat ng ebidensya.

I-share ito kung naniniwala kang dapat nakabatay sa buong katotohanan ang hatol ng Impeachment Court!

[Budget Babe @znsuzara]

The Cayetanos really cannot hide where they stand on this case no matter how hard they try to tone down their condescension and arrogrance.

So much for trying. They are both acting like lead counsels for the defense.

[marvièn @mvn_dn]

As always, Rep. Chel is clear, concise, and compelling.

[Chel Diokno @ChelDiokno]

Kung hindi totoo ang mga AMLC reports tungkol sa bilyon-bilyong dumaan sa mga account ni VP Sara, bakit ayaw ilabas ang kanyang bank at tax records para makita ang buong katotohanan?

[Miss.G 🎧🌈🇵🇭 @gerbett]

Harbat No. 1: Kaya pala STRUGGLING ang Defense panel! Go lang! Sana magsi-taasan ang BP nila! Lalo na si Ms. Tapia! 🤡😅😂🤣 #DaddaKo

[PING LACSON @iampinglacson]

It’s a MIRACLE! Naka wheel chair pumasok, brisk walk lumabas.

Kudos to UP-PGH for putting professionalism and integrity above all other considerations in submitting their medical report to the Sandiganbayan.

[Daniel B. Bautista @bautistadanielb]

ATTY AMANDO LIGUTAN on Grave Threats!!!
✋🏻 🎤

How can you top that???

#ImpeachmentTrial

[Thea Tan @imtheatan]

Honestly, at this point, you have to wonder if some people are suffering from brainrot or if they are genuinely confused by applying what Atty. Ligutan said to absolutely everything in life.

When the Supreme Court ruled in People v. Lastimosa (2025) under Rule 130, Section 4 that a photocopy is admissible to the same extent as an original, they were talking about admissibility of evidence in a court of law.

This means a judge can accept a faithful duplicate to prove what a document says.

It does not mean a xerox copy of a 1,000-peso bill is now legal tender, or that a photocopied passport will pass airport immigration!

This is the DDS trying to insult a brilliant lawyer to save face because their legal team got absolutely demolished in open court in front of millions of Filipinos.

The law dragged us into the 21st century to streamline trials; it didn't give everyone a license to forge IDs.

Please try to understand the context and stop the literal, brain-dead interpretations!

Budlay gid intiendihon haw? Or namian lang gid kamo ya mag minango?

[Rappler @rapplerdotcom]

Several posts are circulating online questioning the prosecution’s use of photocopies during the second day of Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial. These posts lack context.

The Supreme Court, in a 2025 ruling, already said that photocopies of both paper-based and electronic documents are admissible as evidence in court, citing Rule 130, Section 4(c) of the 2019 Revised Rules on Evidence, which took effect in 2020. The rule says a duplicate is admissible as the original if there are no genuine questions about the original’s authenticity, or if it would be considered unfair to use the duplicate.

[Arjay Angeles, RN @iRalliartJay]

Entire Video na 2 HOURS, i PLAY daw sabi ng Defense 😂

PANAY OBJECTION ANG DEFENSE TEAM NI INDAY LUSTAY, AYAW NILA MAKITA TONG VIDEOS NA ITO 😂

DENIED lagi sa OBJECTIONS ang Defense ni Lustay 😂

[marvièn @mvn_dn]

LMAO this whole exchange was so funny