bones

pennies yk

[bones @downmillions]

@fomopayapp @fomo @seyong Coin is going to zero big dog, I really hope you got something in your back pocket to shut everyone up.

[bones @downmillions]

@fomopayapp Can you clear up the fud about the DM man? Thats whats killing this right now

[bones @downmillions]

@fomopayapp Any timeline?

[bones @downmillions]

@JR5_Crypto robinhood:0x91a2dae9699f0b82540b5886b0d8759c22820ba3

[bones @downmillions]

@Habanson17 @kevincodex @museworldhq Ahh I see. Im shocked this has not sent with musebook over 30M right now.

[Gustavo Triana @GtrianaNews]

@Polymarket Trump said the U.S. will use “Super Intelligence” in government documents — he did not say the UN officially renamed AI. Important distinction.

[bones @downmillions]

@alexandr_wang will robinhood:0x91a2dae9699f0b82540b5886b0d8759c22820ba3 be spoken about at the muse event?

[bones @downmillions]

@catoscrypto https://t.co/1y33pTyWyn

[jack silloway @JackSilloway]

$ACAT — THIS IS THE PART PEOPLE ARE IGNORING.

The biggest issue with the current Avax Cat token isn’t the chart. It’s the identity of the meme itself.

The account representing the original idea has publicly called out the token and stated that it is NOT affiliated with them, while also alleging that their artwork was taken without permission.

Meanwhile, the token is trading millions in volume and attracting serious traders purely around the assumption that this is the real Avax Cat.

That’s a massive narrative disconnect.

You can’t build a sustainable meme around an identity while the person behind that identity is publicly telling everyone it’s not theirs.

Big traders, volume and a $1M+ market cap don’t change that.

If the original creator isn’t involved, there is no legitimate creator endorsement to build on. If the art isn’t authorized, there’s another unresolved issue. And if there are no official socials or website connecting the creator to the token, the market is essentially trading a copy of a narrative rather than the source of it.

This isn’t about FUD. It’s about attribution.

The market can speculate on anything. But it shouldn’t confuse speculation with authenticity.

If the original creator is saying “this isn’t me,” that statement deserves to be taken seriously.

[bones @downmillions]

@took_ur_ https://t.co/1y33pTyWyn

[jack silloway @JackSilloway]

$ACAT — THIS IS THE PART PEOPLE ARE IGNORING.

The biggest issue with the current Avax Cat token isn’t the chart. It’s the identity of the meme itself.

The account representing the original idea has publicly called out the token and stated that it is NOT affiliated with them, while also alleging that their artwork was taken without permission.

Meanwhile, the token is trading millions in volume and attracting serious traders purely around the assumption that this is the real Avax Cat.

That’s a massive narrative disconnect.

You can’t build a sustainable meme around an identity while the person behind that identity is publicly telling everyone it’s not theirs.

Big traders, volume and a $1M+ market cap don’t change that.

If the original creator isn’t involved, there is no legitimate creator endorsement to build on. If the art isn’t authorized, there’s another unresolved issue. And if there are no official socials or website connecting the creator to the token, the market is essentially trading a copy of a narrative rather than the source of it.

This isn’t about FUD. It’s about attribution.

The market can speculate on anything. But it shouldn’t confuse speculation with authenticity.

If the original creator is saying “this isn’t me,” that statement deserves to be taken seriously.

[bones @downmillions]

@BlubBlobCoin https://t.co/1y33pTyWyn

[jack silloway @JackSilloway]

$ACAT — THIS IS THE PART PEOPLE ARE IGNORING.

The biggest issue with the current Avax Cat token isn’t the chart. It’s the identity of the meme itself.

The account representing the original idea has publicly called out the token and stated that it is NOT affiliated with them, while also alleging that their artwork was taken without permission.

Meanwhile, the token is trading millions in volume and attracting serious traders purely around the assumption that this is the real Avax Cat.

That’s a massive narrative disconnect.

You can’t build a sustainable meme around an identity while the person behind that identity is publicly telling everyone it’s not theirs.

Big traders, volume and a $1M+ market cap don’t change that.

If the original creator isn’t involved, there is no legitimate creator endorsement to build on. If the art isn’t authorized, there’s another unresolved issue. And if there are no official socials or website connecting the creator to the token, the market is essentially trading a copy of a narrative rather than the source of it.

This isn’t about FUD. It’s about attribution.

The market can speculate on anything. But it shouldn’t confuse speculation with authenticity.

If the original creator is saying “this isn’t me,” that statement deserves to be taken seriously.

[jack silloway @JackSilloway]

$ACAT — THIS IS THE PART PEOPLE ARE IGNORING.

The biggest issue with the current Avax Cat token isn’t the chart. It’s the identity of the meme itself.

The account representing the original idea has publicly called out the token and stated that it is NOT affiliated with them, while also alleging that their artwork was taken without permission.

Meanwhile, the token is trading millions in volume and attracting serious traders purely around the assumption that this is the real Avax Cat.

That’s a massive narrative disconnect.

You can’t build a sustainable meme around an identity while the person behind that identity is publicly telling everyone it’s not theirs.

Big traders, volume and a $1M+ market cap don’t change that.

If the original creator isn’t involved, there is no legitimate creator endorsement to build on. If the art isn’t authorized, there’s another unresolved issue. And if there are no official socials or website connecting the creator to the token, the market is essentially trading a copy of a narrative rather than the source of it.

This isn’t about FUD. It’s about attribution.

The market can speculate on anything. But it shouldn’t confuse speculation with authenticity.

If the original creator is saying “this isn’t me,” that statement deserves to be taken seriously.

[bones @downmillions]

@AvaxCatonSolana @pointfarmcap @frankdegods

[bones @downmillions]

@alexandr_wang $musebook!

[bones @downmillions]

@write2earnRH So thats it huh?

[bones @downmillions]

@write2earnRH Can we get an update brother?

[bones @downmillions]

@DegenCapitalLLC Look into @write2earnRH bro. $WRITE , good project already paid out two people for sure. If they keep it going lots of potential

[bones @downmillions]

@King_Memento bro with $WRITE i have bag worked since 30k with you and havent received a dime. Only credibles ive seen with rewards are you & wizard sadly

[bones @downmillions]

@write2earnRH Ive written 10+ thesis, no where to be seen on the site, I may not be top 10 but im definitely top 50 and I havent received a dime of rewards??

[bones @downmillions]

@write2earnRH @wizardofsoho I have written multiple thesis, with multiple likes. Like 10 thesis with 20-30 likes total. No reward yet at all?