WHY ARE NONE OF THE MAJOR POLITICAL PARTIES TALKING ABOUT JOBS BEING OFFSHORED BY THE BANKS?
Could it be that they are all captured by them!
The banking sector is slashing thousands of jobs in Australia whilst creating them offshore yet no political party apart from People First wants to talk about it.
What’s worse is that no political party apart People First had a policy to stop banks from offshoring jobs.
We intend to charge 100% payroll tax on wages paid offshore by Australian companies for Australian based roles to stop jobs going offshore.
It’s outrageous that the Federal Government applies no withholding tax on this practice as it is.
This is just another policy where People First is putting the Australian People First.
Sign up today to keep our jobs in Australia at https://t.co/PeAaJW2pjF
Our land. Our profits.
••••••••••••
“National Australia Bank says it will cut up to 2,500 jobs, or about 6 per cent of its workforce, by mid-2027.
That would include up to 1,500 roles before the end of this year, NAB said in a statement to the stock exchange.
NAB employs more than 5000 workers in India and a further 2000 in Vietnam in what it calls "innovation centres".
There are currently dozens of job postings on LinkedIn at both the Vietnam and Indian operations, including in marketing and communications, human resources, IT and compliance and risk.
A number of the job listings were posted this week.”
HUGE MILESTONE REACHED... Labor have lost their lead Federally.
But... can you see the problem here?
Why are the L/NP neck-and-neck, but ON still behind on a Two Party Preferred basis?
Simple... it's because if One Nation candidates are eliminated (as in, a seat comes down to a Labor candidate, or an L/NP candidate as the final two) ON voters do a GOOD JOB of preferencing the L/NP above Labor, and that's what gets the L/NP a lot of their seats.
But when it's the reverse? When a seat comes down to Labor vs a One Nation candidate? Too many of the L/NP voters are actually putting LABOR ABOVE ONE NATION in their preferences!
The difference isn't actually Labor, the difference is the L/NP voters themselves!
If the Labor Party were to win an election... it would be BECAUSE OF L/NP VOTERS.
This is true federally as we see here... but it's ALSO true in the coming Victorian State Election, AND will be even MORE true in the NSW State Election next (for reasons I'll cover closer to that time!)
PREFERENCE DISCIPLINE MATTERS. If you're planning to vote L/NP, or you know people who are, help them understand that what they do with their PREFERENCES might be the difference between whether LABOR get back in, or not.
I said in my Marbles Video for the Vic Election LOWER HOUSE that what matters is the ORDER YOU PUT THE BIG 4:
ONE NATION
L/NP
LABOR
GREENS
OR if you're an L/NP voter:
L/NP
ONE NATION
LABOR
GREENS
If there's a STRONG independent then you need to pay attention to them too, and you can put whatever other parties you like inside that mix, but that ORDER matters. The future of Victoria, and in time, Australia, may depend on it!
[Thanks to @AusPoll6 for posting the poll results in an easy to read form! Give them a follow!]
One Nation will closely scrutinise the Cook Labor Government’s Equal Opportunity Bill 2026 and will fight to defeat measures that expand so-called "hate speech" penalties or restrict the freedom of conscience and association of Western Australian businesses and schools.
Western Australians should be protected from genuine discrimination and harassment. That does not include penalising Australians for acknowledging biological reality or following their genuinely held religious and moral views.
Protections for so-called ‘gender identity’ should not override the rights of women and girls in sport, single-sex spaces, prisons or services. Vilification protections should not be used to target Australians who disagree with Labor's mass immigration agenda.
Free speech is a basic human right. Robust debate on all topics must remain protected, and restrictions must only apply to calls to violence and malicious defamation.
The Government must ensure this Bill protects free speech, religious freedom and sex-based rights. One Nation will examine the Bill in detail and pursue amendments to protect Western Australians' freedoms.
VICTORIAN PREMIER REFUSES TO CUT FUNDING TO MOSQUE LEADER WHO SAID MEN CAN “BEAT” THEIR WIVES AND RAPE ISN’T RAPE
Ben Carroll called Samir Mohtadi’s comments “completely disgusting and vile” then refused to rule out more taxpayer cash for his MyCentre mosque.
The Victorian government has already promised MyCentre over $600,000.
What Mohtadi actually said in a lecture titled “The Keys to a Successful Marriage”
- Men can “beat” their wives as a “last resort” to “shape them up” just don’t bruise or draw blood.
- “How can a person rape his wife?”
- Wives must drop everything, even cooking, if their husband wants sex.
- Disobey your husband and “you will go to hell”
- Wives should wear perfume and keep the house “nice and clean”
This is the same imam linked by UAE authorities to the accused Flydubai pilot who allegedly planned to crash a jet into Israel’s Ben Gurion airport.
The pilot reportedly claimed his radicalisation began in Melbourne.
Multiple Labor MPs still pose for photos with him.
Carroll’s response?
Condemn the words, protect the funding, and accuse Opposition Leader Jess Wilson of being “loose with the truth” for saying she’ll stop the money.
MyCentre is also pushing to build a new mosque and schools in Mickleham.
Victorian taxpayers are funding all of it.
Even the UAE is calling out Australia’s Islamic Extremism problem
Are Labor actually protecting the Muslim Brotherhood when they have been warned it’s the world's largest jihadi organisation? If so, who is, and why?
“Last month in Sydney, British historian Lord Andrew Roberts called it "the world's largest jihadi organisation" and said the government "needs to ban the Muslim Brotherhood and its network of companies, charities, NGOs and media outlets".
“The law is ready, and every listing starts with advice from ASIO. So who is holding the pen?”
Some people express amazement when I say Commonwealth Treasury assumed you only held 1 share when calculating effective tax rates under New CGT. I am 100% confident I’m correct on this.
Australia cannot afford to repeat the mistake of mass migration which is tearing apart Europe.
Countries like France, Germany, Belgium and the U.K. are all suffering because of mass migration.
Unless Australia stops importing people who reject our democracy, our way of life and the values of Western civilisation, these riots will eventually be coming to Australian cities.
Labor ministers just refused - repeatedly - to rule out Australians paying 60% tax under their new trusts rules.
On Insiders this morning, Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino was asked three times whether a small construction business could face up to 60% tax because of the 30% minimum tax on discretionary trusts.
His answers:
“Lengthy transition periods to allow different structures to adjust”
“There’s a range of carve-outs which are really important”
“I don’t want to get into particular tax arrangements, what we’re setting is a very reasonable minimum tax”
Pressed on whether anyone could pay more than the current 49% top marginal rate, he still wouldn’t give a clear no.
Instead he pointed to “a very detailed consultation process” and an “extra restructuring pathway”
An hour earlier, Industry Minister Tim Ayres dismissed claims of 60 to 70% rates as “not anywhere near right” and “very complicated claims”
When asked if that was fact or just his opinion, he couldn’t say. He then admitted the changes are “contested” and “difficult” before declaring them “the right thing to do for the tax system”
Labor won’t guarantee small business owners and family trusts won’t be hit with punitive rates, and their ministers spent the morning dodging the question.
I think we all know what that means.
This is the sort of footage that our @eSafetyOffice would like to "protect" us from seeing.
These aren't "protests" in Paris. It's outright anarchy perpetrated by left wing extremists.
A high-profile academic captured the chaos over Labor's Digital Duty of Care bill perfectly as he recalled a meeting with two Labor employees that left him feeling like he “was in Soviet Russia”, writes Louise Roberts. https://t.co/otETqdfV9r
Sport teaches discipline, resilience, teamwork and respect, and gives young people a sense of belonging, it gives them purpose.
That’s why One Nation Victoria will provide every school-age child in Victoria with $150 towards sport each summer and another $150 each winter. That’s $300 per child, every year, to help cover the cost of playing sport.
Keeping kids out of the street and engaged in sport will also help prevent crime before it happens. But here’s my favourite part: we will bring sport into youth detention on an earn-to-play basis, linked to participation in education, therapy and behaviour programs.
Investing in sport means investing in our kids, supporting families and preventing crime before it happens. It is an investment in Victoria’s future.
That’s the common sense approach that One Nation will bring in Spring Street in November! 🇦🇺🧡
The Albanese government is hardly "nurturing social cohesion" after it approved a multi-million grant to a Muslim advocacy body without properly explaining its purpose, writes Nick Cater.
https://t.co/ZNX1Vbx2NJ
Britain arrests about 12,000 people a year for what they post online. That is roughly 30 a day, mostly under laws against ‘grossly offensive’ or ‘harmful’ messages. Most are ordinary citizens whose words offended somebody, somewhere.
Canberra has studied that record and decided to import it.
Article | https://t.co/VIon67VViH
A forensic audit has uncovered false readings and widespread errors in the Bureau of Meteorology’s raw climate data, including blocks of temperature readings copied and pasted across different years and seasons, raising questions about the integrity of records used for climate analysis. Read the full article here: https://t.co/h53e2v34xL
Older Aussies are telling the PM where to “shove it”.
They’re refusing to downsize their homes.
Economist Leith van Onselen says it’s “not worth it”.
Listen to his conversation with Ben HERE.
🎧https://t.co/MHVArf8U1q🎧
Today, One Nation Victoria has made clear that they will be putting Australian families first. Deputy Leader Colleen Harkin has announced a package to support young families. This involves removing all out-of-pocket costs for pregnant women in the public system, a contribution of $2,000 for those opting for private maternity care, and $300 per year for school-aged children towards sport.
We want to support Australians who want to have children and start a family. This involves removing the financial barriers that make having a family prohibitive for many. This package of support announced today for Victorian families is in addition to the One Nation Federal policy to introduce income tax splitting for families with dependent children.
This support will only be available to Australian citizens.