dpope

[dpope @dpope]

@TEDchris @elonmusk So thoughtfully said from one of the few respectable people still on this platform

[Chris Anderson @TEDchris]

With a certain amount of trepidation, I'm posting this open letter to @elonmusk, someone I have admired, but who, right now, is causing me concern. I know I'm not alone in thinking these thoughts. Please like or repost if you're willing... And Elon, if you're listening, please know this is offered in a constructive spirit.

-----

Dear Elon,

A thought hit me this morning.

On top of all your achievements in technology and entrepreneurship, you have become this century's single most influential writer.  You have more than 200 million followers on a powerful platform that you yourself control. And the words that you write flow well beyond just those followers into almost every user of X and far beyond courtesy of extensive media coverage.   This makes Rupert Murdoch at his prime seem inconsequential.

It must feel exhilarating. You made a huge gamble buying Twitter and it seems to have paid off spectacularly to the point that you can use it to massively impact the world, including changing governments.  You believe that X can largely replace most mainstream media. It is the new platform for citizen journalism, and you are citizen number 1.  You don’t need the hassle of editors and fact-checkers. Every single thing you post garners millions of likes and reposts. In a heartbeat you can change the global conversation.  No one in history has had this much power.

So there’s a lot at stake here, and, as it happens, journalism is something I care deeply about. I began my career as a journalist because I believed that good journalism was essential for the healthy functioning of democracy. Today I am worried — quite deeply worried, actually — that in your triumphant seizing of the global conversation, some of the core tenets of journalism are being forgotten. Without them, I think your efforts to make X the respected home of citizen journalism will fail.

There are numerous journalistic principles that matter — Grok can summarize them quite nicely. But there’s one in particular that’s been troubling me. It’s the fairness doctrine. The one that says that before you publish savagely critical claims about an individual, or an institution, you reach out to them for their side of the story. After all, just possibly, you may have missed a key fact or two that would change how people assess what has happened. Just possibly your sources were motivated to cause damage to that individual. Just possibly there’s an alternative explanation of what happened.

So, for example, when you tell hundreds of millions of people that someone should be hanged or jailed for outrageous crimes against humanity, just possibly you should first sound out what those who know those people really well would say about them. Some of your recent posts could literally get someone killed. Do you really want to risk that? How is it possible that you can do this at the very same time that you’re calling on people to make X more positive, more beautiful?  You say you want to maximize un-regretted user-seconds on X.  By far the simplest way you could do this, Elon, is simply to thoughtfully edit what you yourself post.

I get that from your eyes the issues you are championing are unbelievably important and worthy of extreme efforts. But the way you are presenting them is not citizen journalism. It's playground bullying. It’s crass and it’s cruel, and it’s therefore not nearly as effective as it could be.  You’re hearing the cheers of your most loyal followers, but missing the fact you’re making yourself a laughing stock among many who you really want on your side. Long-term that’s going to damage X, your other businesses, and indeed your long-term dreams for humanity.  No one wants to follow a playground bully to Mars.

I miss the old Elon. You can be funny, interesting, insightful and inspiring. You've fought incredibly hard for what you've built. And you may feel you're entitled to do whatever the hell you want with it. But I also know that you understand the danger of holding too tightly to the ring of power, how it can distort someone's judgement and turn them ugly.

I’m hoping you can loosen that ring just a little. For the love of humanity that you profess, I really urge you to embrace the fairness doctrine and showcase a better face of X.

Thanks for listening.

Chris

[Daractenus @Daractenus]

The pro-Trump "free speech enthusiast" owner of this platform decided to just delete the viral anti-Trump ad I posted I few days ago (and replaced it with a "This Post was deleted by the Post author" message).

So here it is again Elon, enjoy!

[Yann LeCun @ylecun]

The mark of the authoritarian:
- Undermine the trust of the public in the sources of reliable information: the media, professional journalists, Wikipedia, universities, scientists, and government agencies.
- Accuse those sources of being corrupt, woke, Marxist, fascist, beholden to powerful interests, stupid, pedophile, whatever.
- Once the public is thoroughly brainwashed, fill their minds with ridiculous mind viruses: the country is bankrupt, it's being overrun by barbaric, murderous, subhumans immigrants who eat your pets and rape your daughters, our crypto-communist opponents want to take away your freedom of speech, elections are rigged, etc
- Now claim: "only I can save the country from the coming Armageddon."

This is a completely standard chapter from the authoritarian playbook.
Almost half of Americans are falling for it, with the help of a few billionaires who are shamelessly willing to sacrifice democracy in the altar of their continued financial and political power.

[Jason Kint @jason_kint]

Here is the full report but I’d be curious how the initial tweet travels if you don’t mind sharing it especially with the subject at hand. https://t.co/cdjGfhyZOw

[Jason Kint @jason_kint]

WSJ tweeted this to its 20 million followers and it has under 400 retweets - presumably suppressed due to the link out. “Elon Musk has secretly been in regular contact with Russian President Vladimir Putin since late 2022”

[dpope @dpope]

@MoneyWeek What idiot on your team wrote the following “article” on iPhone 16 sales?

These “use so much energy it can take a nuclearpower plant to fuel them”.

[dpope @dpope]

@elonmusk Maybe you should do the same

[dpope @dpope]

@MakingSenseHQ Used to admire @elonmusk but not anymore

[dpope @dpope]

@MontePooleNBCS @YouTube @StephenCurry30 the golfer knows the first shot of the round counts as much as every other shot. So why oh why does he have SO MANY first quarter turnovers in basketball?

[dpope @dpope]

@padraig_h @EuropeanTour @PGATOUR @WilsonGolf Do you have any suggestions or drills for minimizing head movement while putting? Thanks for all you videos -- they've been awesome.

[dpope @dpope]

@SteveKerr “Free Solo” a climbers quest to scale El Capitan without ropes highlights true poise under pressure — worth watching together as a team?

[dpope @dpope]

@ddefenba While waiting for that to happen, you could re-map CapsLock to Esc and spend a day or two adjusting. It's not as cathartic as complaining, but it will actually solve your problem.

[dpope @dpope]

@SteveKerr Idea4U: In the spirit of You Are What You Measure, show Steph number of “hook passes” per game + per cent intercepted / deflected, and watch the number go down. They’re disrespectful to opponents and have nothing to do with playing with joy. Go Warriors!

[dpope @dpope]

@SteveKerr Mess with their heads, start Javale!

[dpope @dpope]

@designevokes Sent you a note via [email protected] -- let me know if there is any interest

[dpope @dpope]

I've decided to give @Picturelife a try to see how it handles really large photo collections, check it at: https://t.co/EZL0pwK059

[dpope @dpope]

Free wireframe GUI toolkits for iPhone, iPad, Android and Web apps #design #UX #wireframes http://t.co/wEL9MiPl via @amirkhella

[dpope @dpope]

@gte "Three Things": superb insight. But as a first time reader I must say the white on dark green is *really* hard on the eyes...