@felixxtj@NMRtweet@SECGov Night Market Research is not credible. Their $POET report mixes a few real risks with a lot of distortion, omission, and fear‑based framing. They are an anonymous, unregulated, short‑biased blog — not a research firm.
@WolfOfWeedST@NMRtweet Night Market Research is not credible. Their POET report mixes a few real risks with a lot of distortion, omission, and fear‑based framing. They are an anonymous, unregulated, short‑biased blog ,not a research firm. $POET
@NMRtweet Bottom-tier, Night market research, $POET
Anonymous blogs
No track record
No transparency
No regulatory footprint
Night Market Research is in this bottom tier.
@NMRtweet Uses guilt‑by‑association tactics (e.g., “they pivoted business models”).
Misrepresents technical timelines for photonic integration.
The report is one‑sided, selective, and designed to create fear.
@NMRtweet Night Market Research is not an established, institutional, or widely‑recognized research firm. They are a small, anonymous, activist short‑seller outfit. Their credibility is nowhere near the level of Muddy Waters, Hindenburg, Kerrisdale, or Citron.