So Putin is right.
EU VP Katja Kallas and Representatives for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy openly touts defeating Russia and breaking it into smaller countries.
When Donald Trump jokes Canada as 51st State most of Canada loses their mind & why the Elbow Uptards movement was created.
Now Canada is joining a failing group that wants to attack a nuclear power and break into smaller countries.
We need this to be brought into the House of Commons and Mark Carney to explain himself and his government's stance.
🔴Rusia mató a 300.000 personas en Japón con bombas atómicas. No, fueron los Estados Unidos.
🇩🇪 Rusia mató a entre 5 y 6 millones de judíos.
No, fue Alemania.
🇨🇩 🇧🇪 Rusia mató a 6 millones de personas en el Congo.
No, fue Bélgica.
🇬🇧 Rusia mató a cientos de miles de personas hambrientas en la India y esclavizó a naciones de Asia y África.
No, fue Inglaterra.
🇬🇧🇪🇸🇵🇹 Rusia deportó a millones de africanos encadenados para esclavizarlos en América.
No, eso lo hicieron los británicos, españoles y portugueses.
🇩🇿 Rusia mató a miles de personas en Argelia.
No, fue Francia.
🇻🇳🇰🇭🇺🇸 Rusia mató a 3 millones de personas en Vietnam y a 2 millones en Camboya.
No, fueron los Estados Unidos.
🇰🇷🇰🇵🇺🇸 Rusia mató a seis millones de coreanos —tanto del Sur como del Norte— y a un millón de chinos durante la Guerra de Corea.
No, fueron los Estados Unidos.
🇮🇷 Rusia mató a un millón de personas en Irak, incluso mediante el uso de bombas de uranio empobrecido que todavía provocan que nazcan bebés con deformidades veinte años después.
No, fueron los angloamericanos.
🇦🇫🇺🇸 Rusia mató a más de 240.000 personas en Afganistán.
No, fueron los EE. UU.
🇱🇾Fue Rusia quien bombardeó Yugoslavia y Libia.
No, fueron los EE. UU. y la OTAN.
🇲🇽🇵🇷 Rusia cometió genocidio contra los pueblos indígenas y se anexionó la mitad de México, Puerto Rico, Hawái y otros territorios.
No, fueron los Estados Unidos.
Rusia mató a 100.000 palestinos en la Franja de Gaza tan solo durante el actual conflicto de Oriente Medio.
No, fue Israel.
La propaganda de los medios de comunicación difunde exactamente lo contrario.
I AM NOT, AND WILL NEVER BE, AMONG THOSE LOOKING FOR A PRETEXT FOR WAR BETWEEN NATO AND RUSSIA
I respect that Czech President Petr Pavel, as a former NATO general, would like to fight. I would therefore appreciate it if he respected the fact that I prefer peace.
Czech President Petr Pavel, whom I have always treated with respect and due regard as the head of the sovereign Czech Republic, often tends to comment on my work. This time, he took issue with my position on attempts to provoke a military conflict between NATO and Russia.
I understand that, as a former NATO general, he would like to fight. I expect him to respect my commitment to pursuing peace. Let me therefore repeat once again, so that there can be no doubt:
1️⃣ The West’s military rhetoric and the search for a pretext for a military conflict with Russia are intended to distract from the liberal world’s inability to address basic challenges such as the price and availability of energy and fuel, as well as illegal migration.
2️⃣ As long as I am Prime Minister of the Slovak Republic, I will not agree to Slovak soldiers taking part in any military adventure provoked by anyone within NATO.
3️⃣ In the event of an actual armed attack against one or more NATO member states, the relevant Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty provides NATO members with several options for demonstrating solidarity.
The past decade has really made me reassess the nature of WW1 & 2.
What has Russia actually done to increase hostility with the West? Well, they blew up Nordstream, right? Nope. That was a CIA/Ukraine operation blamed on Russia. But they installed Trump in 2016, right? Nope. That was a CIA/FBI operation to hand the WH to Hillary Clinton. But they invaded Ukraine, right? Well, yeah. After decades of NATO expansion and provocations like Maidan, they finally did something about it.
So, in short, Russia did basically nothing to the West. And yet the West is ramping up for direct war against Russia all across Europe.
Does the public support it? No. Not at all.
Just as the debt supercycle hits many quadrillions a major war seems to have been created out of thin air.
So you might want to reconsider your historical understandings of world wars and recognize that you're currently living thru the latest bullshit chapter.
“To offend a strong man, tell him a lie, To offend a weak man, tell him the truth.”
- Marcus Aurelius
Marcus Aurelius (121–180 AD) was a Roman emperor, philosopher, and leading figure in Stoic thought.
Although he governed one of history’s greatest empires, Aurelius believed genuine strength came not from riches, authority, or recognition, but from wisdom, self-discipline, and the ability to maintain composure in the face of adversity.
His private writings, later published as Meditations, reveal his lifelong effort to master his emotions, embrace circumstances beyond his control, and conduct himself with virtue and rationality.
“To offend a strong man, tell him a lie. To offend a weak man, tell him the truth.”
This saying is frequently credited to Marcus Aurelius, although no reliable historical source confirms that he actually spoke or wrote these words.
The message suggests that genuine strength lies in the willingness to confront reality. Those who possess inner confidence can acknowledge uncomfortable truths, recognize their shortcomings, and use criticism as an opportunity for personal growth.
Conversely, someone whose identity depends on protecting their pride may perceive honesty as an attack. When the truth exposes their insecurities, mistakes, or excuses, they may respond with defensiveness rather than reflection.
True strength is not found in escaping uncomfortable realities, but in developing the courage to confront them.
Honesty may temporarily wound your pride, but refusing to face the truth can prevent you from ever becoming stronger.
Interviewer to Ursula von der Leyen:-
“Are your children in the Military”
<Laughs> NO
This is how they all think - your Children are totally expendable to them.
Exactly this: NATO is systematically conducting actual bombing strikes deep inside Russia via its Ukrainian proxy, all while it desperately tries to convince Western publics that it is Russia that is threatening Europe through “hybrid warfare” — which generally means attacks no one can see but are totally-100%-trust us happening. When Russia actually decides to retaliate, NATO will argue it is entirely unprovoked and use it as confirmation that they were right all along. An insanely dangerous game.
This morning saw the largest drone attack on Moscow since the start of the war. Russia had anticipated a major attack aimed at disrupting its elections, yet several drones penetrated its air-defence systems. No serious analysts believe that such large scale attacks that aim to circumvent Russia's air defences are done without NATO participation. After surviving the Cold War, today’s political class seems determined to risk triggering a nuclear war.
The pig is the only farm animal a king cannot tax, which is why kings and priests have spent 3,000 years trying to get rid of it.
The sheep:
- Grows a fleece you can tax every spring
- Walks to the temple in a flock
- Needs pasture, and pasture has an owner
The cow:
- Gives milk and pulls the plough
- 1 calf a year
- Needs more pasture, and a bigger owner
The pig:
- No wool, no milk, will not pull anything
- Will not be driven in a flock
- Lives behind the house on scraps
- 2 litters a year, 10 piglets a time
- Bacon weight in 6 months
The first cities of the Near East ran on sheep. The temple ledgers count them by the hundred thousand and barely mention a pig. Yet dig up the poor quarters of those same cities and the ground is full of pig bone.
Herodotus reports that Egyptian swineherds were the one group barred from every temple in the country. The workers' villages beside the great building sites are knee deep in pig.
The pig was feeding the people the ledger could not see. It needed no land, paid no tithe and answered to no landlord.
It was never the worm. The worm in pork was found under a microscope in 1835, and the ban is 2,500 years older than its excuse. Beef carries a tapeworm of its own and nobody ever banned the cow.
So the men who owned the land, the flocks and the temple examined the one animal that made a poor family independent of all three, and found that it was filthy.
A new Finnish nationwide register study has been published.
They looked into every under-23 who contacted Finland’s gender clinics from 1996–2019.
2,083 children and young adults vs 16,643 matched controls, followed in mandatory national health registers (so basically the full country picture).
What they found
- Gender-referred youth had far more serious psychiatric illness than peers — before referral (~46% vs ~15%) and it increased ≥2 years after (~62% vs ~15%).
- Kids referred after 2010 arrived with more psychiatric need than earlier cohorts.
- Among those who got medical “gender reassignment,” psychiatric morbidity INCREASED over follow-up (about 10% → 61% for feminising pathways; ~22% → ~55% for masculinising).
- Authors’ bottom line: psychiatric needs do not go away after medical reassignment!