Dramwil

[Dramwil @dramwil]

https://t.co/AdaxVjdL6t

[Dramwil @dramwil]

@yaygha This is the reason why Islam mandate women to cover up.

[Dramwil @dramwil]

@Rianstone Or you can just mary a second younger wife.

[Dramwil @dramwil]

@swordharrington @Rianstone this is why polygamy exist.

[Dramwil @dramwil]

@lolibonze @daaayyyve @Rianstone exactly right, what's point of watching a movie if you already know what is going to happen? It kills the mystery and fun of it.

[Oloye. @Ol0ye]

White man diacovers oil. Uses it to better his society and raise the standards of living for everyone.

Black man discovers oil. Uses it to enrich himself and associates while everyone else lives in squalor.

I swear to God, there's a superior race and it's not us.

[Dramwil @dramwil]

@samson_samsen She will use your love for her to extract more M🏧💰E🪫Attention T🕐.

[French OG | Your Dating and Relationship Guide @FrenchOG3]

Women being honest.

[Dramwil @dramwil]

@samson_samsen This response actually works effectively on most normal naive men. It disarms the man.

[Dramwil @dramwil]

@samson_samsen This response is a direct attack against a man's ego, implying that he has yet to find a woman who loves him. It is a similar response to not all women are like that. 😂

[Dramwil @dramwil]

A marriage doesn’t operate on appreciation, it operates on leverage. Give the bare minimum necessary, and stretch it out for as long as it can be maintained.

[Mr Sergio @samson_samsen]

Men, do not delude yourselves with the “for better or worse” myth and invest excessively in marriage.

Invest in it with only a minimal percentage of your worth, as you would any other high-risk investment.

Be so self-sufficient before marriage that you can run your home on a harmless and mildly percentage of your finances.

Marry a woman who poses less threat to your finances, peace, and emotional stability.

Make marriage one of the smallest running investments in your portfolio.

Because when you invest too much of yourself in marriage, you relinquish more profitable parts of your existence for something as low-profit and uncertain as marriage.

Marriage is a volatile market, invest in it as you'd in other volatile assets.

[Mr Sergio @samson_samsen]

Men, do not delude yourselves with the “for better or worse” myth and invest excessively in marriage.

Invest in it with only a minimal percentage of your worth, as you would any other high-risk investment.

Be so self-sufficient before marriage that you can run your home on a harmless and mildly percentage of your finances.

Marry a woman who poses less threat to your finances, peace, and emotional stability.

Make marriage one of the smallest running investments in your portfolio.

Because when you invest too much of yourself in marriage, you relinquish more profitable parts of your existence for something as low-profit and uncertain as marriage.

Marriage is a volatile market, invest in it as you'd in other volatile assets.

[Dramwil @dramwil]

@codedbruhh This is why men and society at large must not to take most of women opinions and complaint's seriously. Women want and demand more and more and never satisfied, then men will do more to please them, and this will eventually make everything expensive.

[Dramwil @dramwil]

@codedbruhh Any Long-term cohabitation with a woman will lead to emasculation. It will almost always results in the slow erosion of a man's masculinity and independence.

[Aruvin 💊 @aruvinchan]

Women simply don't understand that men don't need women like women need men.

To most men, women are an optional add-on in our lives.

Nice to have, but not strictly speaking necessary.

My happiest time of my life (2012), I was single at that time.

To most women, a man is the central figure of her life, without which she'll be floundering like a fish out of water trying to provide for herself, protect herself, do her own manual labor, deal with loneliness and depression alone, be a childless loser, go out alone, travel alone, etc.

This is why women don't understand why men don't "date with intention" or "date with a purpose" like women do.

Why would we?

You're just a bit of fun.

You're not mission-critical to anything in our lives, far from it actually.

We date only as seriously as we need you -- which is not very much to begin with.

If women needing men is a 10, men needing women is like a 2.

[Nnamani 4th General🎖️ @Nnamani4G]

@yaygha I don’t feel bad for weak men. They go the extreme to make other men look stupid from trying to save them. And I love nature so much that it has its way of punishing such men. It doesn’t matter how long it takes, they always meet them at the front.

[Dramwil @dramwil]

@samson_samsen Your 100% on point on all of them bro. The moment she becomes your partner she will begin to overpower you and emasculate you.

[Mr Sergio @samson_samsen]

1. Never see a "partnership" in any relationship with a woman. The term partner denotes shared responsibility. And Women have a stronger interest in being a responsibility than in fulfilling responsibilities.

2. You're a man. The first thing a woman sees when she sees you is an opportunity or a relief. She does not see shared dreams waiting for a partner.

3. Women do not have dream cars, mansions, or personalities. They have dream men. Everything else comes with the man. She is not your partner. You are a means to her end.

4. It is best that you see her for what she is: a liability, your responsibility, your ward. Take it upon yourself to keep her conformed. She is not your partner; she is your responsibility. Therefore, her freedom to make, contribute or challenge decisions should be limited.

5. Goodluck. Or, congratulations.

[Yehgha @yaygha]

Ruthless, manipulative, selfish, opportunistic, dishonourable, fickle, unreliable, neurotic, self-obsessed, narcissistic, ungrateful, (slightly) retarded, et fucking cetera.

Does he read The Manipulated Man, and make it his creed

[Yehgha @yaygha]

Sex First. Relationship Later.

Do not ask a woman out unless she hints at a relationship with you.

Attempt to sleep with her first, if you're good with women, you will be successful in this regard more than half the time.

In situations where you are successful, the post nut mental clarity should, hopefully, give you better insight on whether or not she is truly worth being in a relationship with or if you were just infatuated.

If you still think she is worth dating even after sleeping with her, wait. Do not rush to ask her out. You're already getting the milk without buying the cow. And beyond your testosterone-induced desire to keep her for yourself, there is no concrete reason to open negotiations for a potential purchase. Yet.

Decent women are generally unwilling to grant sexual access outside the security of commitment. Although this disinclination may be relaxed depending on the perceived quality of the man who is asking.

The not-so-decent and more delusional ones sleep with men they like and hope it will somehow, make them commit.

And the rotten, promiscuous ones will let just about anybody hit who they reckon will reward them materially. They do not care about commitment. If a man is fool!sh enough to ask them out, fine. They will help him fulfil his destiny. If not, still fine.

Although the first two classifications on the one hand, and the second and third on the other, sometimes overlap and therefore, aren't absolute, this is a good rule of thumb that takes out a lot of the complexity and confusion while offering an acceptable degree of accuracy.

On that basis, where she refuses you sexual access in absolute terms or offers friendship instead, abandon mission and change focus to other targets.

Resist the temptation to be her friend. You will lose.

Where however, her refusal is predicated on the absence of a relationship, it is up to you to discern if this is a general principle she holds or if it is one she has made for suckers like you.

You will have to figure this bit out yourself. I cannot teach it.

But if she lets you hit, for the sake of simplicity, this puts her in the second category. And typically, women in this category will at some point ask the 'what are we?' question or some other variation of it. The earlier she asks, the more redeemable she is. Assuming you are in the business of playing Jesus.

If she neither asks nor hint at it by actions, body language or words, that puts her in the third category: For the streets only.

This then is the overarching benefit of a man adopting a sex first approach. It facillitates the vetting process and generally yields much better results.

But most men are low value. And I do not mean low value in a strictly financial sense. I mean it in the sense that in addition to their lack of resources, they are, most significantly, naive, non-ruthless, do not understand women and so do not know how to efficiently get what they want from them.

And it is for these reasons their go-to strategy for getting women to sleep with them is to offer romantic devotion. They have nothing of substance to give so offer their worthless commitment in exchange for sex.

Worthless, because a man's commitment is only as valuable as that which he trades it for. If he barters it for something as dirt cheap as sex or gives it to unremarkable women, it is because it is not worth much.

Which is exactly why such men attract low quality women – they get what they can 'pay' for.

[Dramwil @dramwil]

This is so effective it attack men's ego, especially if you still plugged in.

[COMRADE.xe @KomradeAyo]

@Playboy_of_X there’s a reason why women use incel and gay as insults.
if you’re not fucking women then you’re not sharing your resources with them
so they’ll collectively shame you.