I believe that conventional wisdom should always be challenged. I’m an old fashioned Liberal that believes in free speech, civil liberties, & true diversity.
So to recap what happened with the USMNT:
• Balogun received a bogus red card
• VAR protocol isn't followed (no slow-mo)
• Trump calls Infantino to ask about the process
• US Soccer lawyers preapre & submit an appeal
FIFA's independent 18-person disciplinary committee then met, approved the appeal, and told Balogun he could play in Monday's match against Belgium.
That's what everyone is complaining about?
All rules were followed, and that same process is open to every other country. The only difference is everyone knows the red card was a mistake to begin with.
So Congress, including Republicans, passed laws allowing your car to spy on you, which is hugely unpopular, but can’t pass voter ID, which is hugely popular.
Scientists say more research is needed, but nearly all pancreatic cancer patients who responded to the personalized vaccine are still alive 6 years later.
Less than 13% of people diagnosed with pancreatic cancer live for more than 5 years.
👉🏻 https://t.co/qb5UTrgEr8
Elon Musk just dropped the most important litmus test for freedom you’ll hear all year:
“You can tell the good side from the bad side by who wants to restrict freedom of speech. The side that censors? That’s the Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini playbook. Censorship + big government = fascism. Ideas should win because they’re stronger—not because the others are silenced.”
Dead serious: the EU itself wrote this into law.
Article 11 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights literally guarantees freedom of expression and information. That’s not “extremist.” That’s official European scripture.
Watch the full 1:19 clip and drop your take below:
When did defending free speech become the controversial position?