Our most recent paper! We believe in extensive education of our families prior to OIT! @PedsAllergyDoc
A counselling video with pre- and post- testing and checklist for oral immunotherapy consent improves participant knowledge https://t.co/19jd7Siy7K
On my way to Austin and am very excited to attend the launch of our novel way to introduce food allergens to babies to prevent food allergy! Has been a very exciting journey!! @VenterCarina@GoAllergy https://t.co/44O4kPbvXi
MYTH: "I heard that my next allergic reaction is going to be worst"
Understand the FACTS! Now that's cool! @DrDougMackMD
Listen to the episode at: https://t.co/NEabzADd6X
Thresholds already shape food allergy care—so why not use them more effectively? Dr. Douglas Mack joins The Allergist to discuss what they are, how real-world factors shift them, and how allergists can use them to counsel patients more precisely. @DrDougMackMD Listen here: https://t.co/0IwKaNh4Yj
@Kidsdoc1Rick@PedsAllergyDoc Fully agree, this should not be attempted at home!! We've been doing this for over a decade and there can be significant challenges! This should only be performed with allergist oversight!
OIT for peanut allergies is not new. This is interesting but it should be done with very close supervision under a pediatric allergist so don’t attempt it at home without help. @PedsAllergyDoc@DrDougMackMD
Sensitization does not mean allergy. True food allergy is something much smaller. Without a clinical history of reaction, you don't end up at a diagnosis. So that panel food test you just asked for is just a terrible, terrible idea... https://t.co/3ojKXrYDAS @DrDougMackMD
👉Panel food testing can actively cause harm to patients, and allergists must remain critical of this outdated practice [Al Ghamdi et al. CSACI statement: panel testing for food allergies. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2024]
@allergydoc4kidz@DrDougMackMD https://t.co/CKCGE8WiX1
@Londonallergist@PedsAllergyDoc@ProfPeteSmith Agree- not the negatives I'm worried about - and also agree - access to OFC is a major issue! One of the core principles of screening is access and willingness to perform confirmatory testing
@Londonallergist@PedsAllergyDoc@ProfPeteSmith I guess this is assuming that a skin test or blood test is objective - it really isn't, unfortunately. I get the nuance, but we are using tests that have never been validated as screening tests, and this approach really needs to reconsidered. Hence the position statement!
@ProfPeteSmith@Londonallergist@PedsAllergyDoc Agree - discuss risk - relying on faulty tests rarely provides relief in general and sets the standard for further unnecessary testing,
@Londonallergist@PedsAllergyDoc@ProfPeteSmith The biggest issue with that approach is that these are not screening tests, and any wheal can and likely will solidify their resolve to avoid.