You lost your privilege to speak with me. You’re sending me posts from a George Soros funded guys website that has ZERO journalist or academic background that “fact checks” scientific data with himself and his sex worker girlfriends 🤣
You’re a lost cause my friend. Your only hope is to log off the internet, stop following Internet personalities and non academic websites…learn what academic scholarly knowledge and criteria is and stop believing a guy (Hitler) that never had high military rank, high academic performance, or a thorough background of professional credibility that failed bottom tier college applications twice, rose up to prominence by his own volition.
They interbreed because the false messiah heretic ‘Jacob Frank’ (who taught to claim a religion to hide Satanic Acts) promoted incestuous relationships among many other heresies.
If you’re ready to learn why these false ‘Jews’ do the Satanic things they do you need to study him and Sabbatai Zevi before him.
David Icke has written over 20 books and is one of the best researchers of our time.
You haven’t named one researcher more accomplished in this entire back and forth.
Internet blogging and X posting is not reputable citation.
Your insistence on tagging me in those doesn’t even show community college citation awareness.
You can’t confirm something that’s unfalsifiable.
Furthermore, the preponderance of the evidence leans towards the document existing more than it not.
For what other reason are you asserting that Hitler put two rounds in the chest of the leader of his home country?
I implore you to layout a case with better reasoning, evidence and cross references.
@afo77_@0ccultbot The question was not if a Newspaper article can be left unsigned the question was regarding academic citation criteria—and if an unsigned article reaches the criteria—which an unsigned article does NOT meet.
You can keep regurgitating the same talking points but until you cite actual academic sources (that don’t use deceptive language) you have no foundation.
You attempting to prove that these people derive from the Middle East is laughable at best which is why I’m imploring you to die on this hill.
These are just white guys playing dress up, NOT Middle Easterners.
They are NOT Semites and the term Anti-Semitism is a farce as they’re not even Semites.
Don’t pretend the convo didn’t shift to are ‘Jews’ actually ‘Jews’, which they are not.
Furthermore…
You make statements with no academic foundation and then once refuted with actual academic foundation you try to prove they’re lies with screenshots of random blogs, x posters or supposed emails of George Soros funded non journalists.
Yes Hitler supported Zionist Organizations to remove ‘Jews’.
No Hitler did not ban the Zionist flag.
Yes Hitler received funding from Rothschild banker cronies.
This is what the actual journalists and researchers say.
I understand random online personalities deny these things, but they are just that—random online personalities.
Snopes is incredibly unreliable.
It’s a George Soros funded operation started by a guy (David Mikkelson) who has no formal Journalist background whatsoever.
He got his start in online message boards on urban legends and started Snopes with himself and his sex worker girlfriends as the ‘Fact Checkers’.
There is a flaw in this study…
“Genetically Related” simply means shared genealogy.
If you were to take 500 historically European families and test their genetics they would likely show the same genetic homogeneousness.
This is ENTIRELY different from results showing that they show direct origin to that of a certain Ancient tribe of the Middle East for example.
So refutation this is not.
@afo77_@0ccultbot He lied based on what reputable sources? Please provide.
Also, If it’s a “lie” why is it against the law to publicly show results of DNA testing in Israel?
What might they have to hide?
Please think critically.
So called ‘Jewish’ Immigrants have been immigrating long before 1933 with the overwhelming majority settling across different parts Europe. The origin of ‘Yiddish’ the Ashkenazi and the practices of the Babylonian Talmud.
(Source from De Gruyter, very rigorously peer reviewed and well researched academic publication from Berlin, Germany)
https://t.co/yn5qNxdnDY
Please list the names of these “leading geneticists”.
As it stands I am the only one of us to actually provide research of a leading geneticist.
Also if you wouldn’t mind confirming whether or not Zionist organizations support these “leading geneticists” and how their science finding refute Elhaik.
There’s obvious ignorance on your part being displayed as even a small boy from the Middle East can tell the difference between Middle Easterners and Europeans in appearance, so therefore DNA testing isn’t necessary but the science has been in all the same.
@afo77_@0ccultbot A screenshot of an excerpt that any human or primate can type up on Google docs is NOT a legitimate source.
Funny how all these supposed ‘sources’ conveniently leave out all criteria’s of citation.
It can’t be cited if it’s missing one or more of the following:
-Publication Date
-Article Name
-Article Writer
-Publication Name
Fake Articles cleverly leave one or more of these things missing knowing very well that the non-academic will not be able to tell the difference.
Without all of the above things attached to the article in unison an article can NOT be researched and confirmed in official archives.
Further even if it had all of these things (which your sources don’t), it’s still a weak source if not corroborated with different legitimate sources that also include the criteria’s of citation in unison.