@longislandviper Problem with changing this is that we won't know of when a match will end, it can end in say 90 mins when no time's wasted, or it can go on for say 3, maybe even 4 hrs, where a lot of time's wasted. This gives TV networks a headache cuz they want a fix time slot for all matches
@Shinygati@Pirat_Nation I agree with you. This new price could have been a lot lower if Valve's ability to manage supply chains effectively not been so atrocious. They should just give up on the Steam Machine now honestly.
@zerodhamarkets I don't feel comfortable with Pharma companies thinking like a late-stage capitalistic business so that they could earn recurring revenue from chronic patients, it's like a subscription model but for medicines.
@aravind At this point I feel that many people inside of several government agencies are compromised. It's the only reason that any of this makes sense.
@sediq_abub@Pirat_Nation It's really not that hard or unfeasible especially for Rockstar. They have also done similar things like this before, like they have personally hand delivered physical copies of GTA 4 in 2008 to journalists for review
@asha_shar -Be better at marketing & messaging
-Lower the console's price
-Ship great games consistently & within a shorter time period
-Remove day 1 titles from GP cuz it isn't sustainable & make it a back catalog sub
-Make console online gaming free
-Improve the Xbox app experience on PC
@aakashgupta There's just no way that game pass ever crosses 100 million subs. The market isn't big enough (even if you include pc, mobile, cloud). Most gamers only play about 2-3 games a month (probably even less). Gaming subscription doesn't work the same way as music, movies, TV or anime.