McFly

[McFly @DreamerMcfly]

@COTInetwork Do It!

[TxPipe @txpipe_tools]

Oura turns the Cardano blockchain into a stream you can pipe anywhere.

Stop wrestling with raw chain data — read it from a node, reshape it, and ship it wherever your app needs it.

A quick tour. 🧵👇

[COTI Foundation @COTInetwork]

The End to End Private Token Loop 🔁
Top Tokens: Public → private → public again.

Shielded tokens have never been easier.
Hold and send them in @MetaMask, flip back to public whenever you want.

End-to-end privacy in the #1 wallet.

[Clover Nodes @CloverNodes]

Out at a local community marketplace today introducing people to @WorldMobileTeam and showing them there’s finally a better option for mobile plans in the USA.

If we want to see the network grow, this is the work that needs to be done.

To all Network Builders: don’t wait for adoption, go create it!!!

[Charles Hoskinson @IOHK_Charles]

Why Cardano is the only Ecosystem that can run the world https://t.co/tJd2sAvqjy

[Clover Nodes @CloverNodes]

🚨 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗠𝗼𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗼𝘀𝗽𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗰 𝗔𝗠𝗔 𝗥𝗲𝗰𝗮𝗽

Big theme: Connectivity is becoming one of the most important infrastructure layers of the AI economy.

As AI scales, devices multiply and data demand explodes, the team believes existing telecom infrastructure alone won't be enough. @WorldMobileTeam Stratospheric is being built to add a new layer between towers and satellites.

𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝘂𝗽𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀:
- Richard Deacon (CEO) @CEOWMS, Kevin Bean (CTO) @WMSCTO, Gregory Gottlieb (Aerial platform technology specialist for World Mobile) @WMGregoryG formally introduced to the community
- Team brings decades of aerospace, defense, air traffic management and unmanned systems experience
- Development of the platform has been underway for roughly a decade
- Focus remains on delivering direct-to-device connectivity from the stratosphere

𝗔𝗜 + 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗶𝘁𝘆:
- AI was described as the next major driver of network demand
- Future AI systems require constant connectivity, bandwidth, and low latency
- The team believes connectivity is becoming just as important as compute
- Current telecom infrastructure was described as unprepared for the scale of future demand

𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗼𝘀𝗽𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗰?
- Designed to complement towers, fiber, AirNodes and satellites rather than replace them
- Targets areas where traditional infrastructure becomes too expensive or difficult to deploy
- Can provide coverage across rural regions, remote communities, transport corridors and disaster-prone areas
- Positioned as a new infrastructure layer that fills gaps between terrestrial and satellite networks

𝗘𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗰𝘀:
- Each aircraft is designed to cover approximately 15,000 km²
- Equivalent geographic coverage of roughly 450 terrestrial towers
- Team claims connectivity costs can be reduced by up to 90% versus traditional approaches
- Multiple examples were shared where operators could potentially save billions in infrastructure deployment costs

𝗗𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁-𝘁𝗼-𝗱𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗰𝗲 (𝗗𝟮𝗗):
- No hardware modifications required on the handset
- Phones connect directly to the airborne network layer
- Designed for high bandwidth use cases, not just emergency messaging
- Goal is to support AI, IoT, agriculture, logistics, automation and future connected devices at scale

𝗟𝗘𝗢 𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝘃𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗼𝘀𝗽𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗰:
- Team acknowledged LEO providers helped validate the D2D market
- View shared that satellites are excellent for global reach but face bandwidth and physics limitations
- Stratospheric platforms aim to provide significantly higher throughput and lower latency in regional deployments
- Described as a complementary layer rather than a direct replacement

𝗣𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗮𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗻𝗮:
- Considered one of the core technical moats of the platform
- 3m x 3m active electronically scanned array
- Capable of generating 400+ steerable beams
- Beams can dynamically adjust power, shape and coverage based on demand
- AI is being explored to optimize coverage in real time

𝗛𝘆𝗱𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗲𝗻 𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗶𝗿𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗳𝘁:
- Aircraft designed around liquid hydrogen propulsion
- Enables significantly longer endurance than solar-only alternatives
- Operates day and night rather than relying on constant sunlight
- Team views hydrogen as a key enabler for commercial viability

𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝘀𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗶𝗴𝗻𝘁𝘆:
- Growing demand from governments and regulators highlighted
- Architecture allows traffic to remain within national boundaries
- Presented as a major advantage over systems that route data through external infrastructure
- Increasingly becoming a key topic in discussions with potential customers and partners

𝗧𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀:
- Previous demonstrations successfully achieved 4G and 5G direct-to-device connectivity from the stratosphere
- Testing confirmed strong signal performance both outdoors and indoors
- Technology has already moved through lab and tower-based validation phases
- Focus now shifts toward full operational demonstrations

𝗥𝗼𝗮𝗱𝗺𝗮𝗽:
- Upcoming Islander aircraft trials are the next major milestone
- Goal is to demonstrate a complete telecom service operating from an aircraft
- Team emphasized that most core technical risks have already been addressed
- Current focus is integrating all components into a commercial service platform

𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗠𝗼𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻:
- Stratospheric is intended to work alongside AirNodes, EarthNodes, World Mobile Chain and the broader sharing economy model
- Described as a critical piece of the long-term mission to connect underserved populations
- Each platform is designed to extend coverage while maintaining privacy, sovereignty and affordability
- Team repeatedly emphasized this is infrastructure built for the next generation of connectivity

𝗤𝘂𝗶𝗰𝗸 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗮𝘄𝗮𝘆:
- This AMA was less about a product launch and more about introducing the team, technology and vision behind World Mobile Stratospheric
- The core message: AI may be driving demand, but connectivity remains the foundation
- World Mobile believes the stratosphere is the next major layer in global telecom infrastructure

[COTI Foundation @COTInetwork]

https://t.co/x00sNPRqPp

[TapTools @TapTools]

After four years of building for Cardano, today we have difficult news to share.

[McFly @DreamerMcfly]

@avaxricious @TheRealWeb3Kat Just happen that they are trying to use this momentum to the down side to fuck more the price of iag nothing more.

[COTI Foundation @COTInetwork]

Everything an AI agent needs to operate privately on-chain, in one stack 🔐
🔹 8 Agent Skills: Wallets, private tokens, encrypted messaging, smart contracts
🔹 Private Messaging SDK: End-to-end encrypted agent-to-agent communication
🔹 Web4 Grants Program: Free gas + $COTI rewards every 14 days
🔹 48+ MCP Tools: Works with Claude, Codex, OpenClaw, Hermes, and more

Open source on GitHub. Setup in under 10 minutes.
Start building 👉 https://t.co/yBmvataOGM

[COTI Foundation @COTInetwork]

Every OpenClaw agent can go private on-chain with COTI 🦞
One of the biggest open-source AI agents in the world with 100k+ GitHub stars ✨

Encrypted messaging. Private tokens. On-chain rewards. All powered by $COTI Garbled Circuits. Unlock the power of privacy for your @OpenClaw

Get started 👉 https://t.co/yBmvatbmwk

[McFly @DreamerMcfly]

@IOHK_Charles @KanaKemo Nice!

[McFly @DreamerMcfly]

@Epka_Epka Do you mean?

[Dave @ItsDave_ADA]

I have given my heart and soul to Cardano over the past years, late nights, weekends, time. I have two young daughters, with another on the way.

I won't give up on Cardano, I won't be bullied out of Cardano, and I will absolutely now ramp up my efforts on Cardano.

The show, goes on, and we are a decentralized community, where every voice matters, we are united, we are together, we are equal.

WE are Cardano.

[⛏️Dr. Navjit Dhaliwal @NaVi_GaT0R]

Charles, when every critic becomes a villain, the pattern is not everyone else. The pattern is you.

You just listed Optim, Iagon, Cardano Whale, Dave, Rick, Adam and others like this is an "inventory." It is not an inventory. It is a list of people in this ecosystem who have questioned you, disagreed with you, did something you didn't like, challenged IOG, challenged a narrative or refused to act like Cardano governance exists only to ratify what you want.

And instead of reflecting on why so many serious people keep ending up on the other side of your megaphone, you reach for the same playbook every time

- Dismiss the substance.
- Attack the person.
- Recast yourself as the victim.
- Then tell everyone else to "grow up."

So let's take the Iagon part of your "inventory," since you brought us into it. You say Iagon "started bullying and harassing" Midnight ambassadors. That is a convenient story, but it is not what happened.

I as a dRep asked a governance question, NOT Iagon.
A dRep asked whether people with roles connected to Midnight or IOG linked interests, who also held meaningful dRep voting power, should abstain on IOG related treasury proposals. That is governance.

That is literally what dReps are supposed to do - ask hard questions, examine conflicts, protect treasury neutrality and represent the $ADA holders who delegated voting power to them. If a person is participating in governance with delegated $ADA while also holding a role connected to a project or organization affected by that vote, asking about conflicts is not an attack. It is accountability.

And let's be very clear - ambassadors are not above scrutiny. dReps are not above scrutiny. Iagon is not above scrutiny. IOG is not above scrutiny. Midnight is not above scrutiny. You are not above scrutiny.

This is supposed to be decentralized governance, not a court where certain people get protected status because they are useful to Charles Hoskinson.

The moment a person participates in public governance with public voting power, the public is allowed to ask public questions. You did not answer the conflict question. You reframed it as "bullying" - ironically this is exactly what you have been doing in this ecosystem.

Then you escalated it into an attack on Iagon, my leadership and the holders.

You used your platform to tell the market you had "no more time" for the project unless leadership changed. You warned that Iagon could fail and destroy value for token holders. You called into question the ethics and integrity my leadership. You accused us of acting out of spite rather than engaging with the actual governance concern.

And then, after the damage was done, you turned around and said people are "playing the victim." That is not leadership. That is deflection.

You cannot threaten a Cardano native project, watch real holders suffer, then accuse the people objecting to the threat of being childish.

You cannot say you care about token holders while dismissing "your token holders" when those holders happen to be in a project that challenged you.

There are no "Iagon holders" over there and "Cardano holders" over here. $IAG holders are $ADA holders.

They are stake pool operators.
They are voters.
They are dReps.
They are builders.
They are community members.
They are families.
They are the same ecosystem you claim to defend.

When you attack a Cardano project, you are not attacking some foreign body. You are attacking people inside Cardano. That is the part you keep avoiding.

You talk about ambassadors being bullied. Fine. I will say this clearly - I do not condone harassment of any ambassador, volunteer, dRep, builder, SPO or community member. Anyone who crosses into personal abuse should stop.

But do not use "protecting ambassadors" as a shield to make governance questions untouchable. Do not use volunteers as human armor around treasury proposals.
Do not say "decentralized governance" when the rule is really - vote,but do not question my side - ask question but not about my people - participate but only if you accept the consequences of my platform turning on you.

That is not governance.

That is intimidation. And since we are talking about red lines, where were those red lines when Iagon was being called a scam? Where were those red lines when IOG aligned voices and consultants were smearing Iagon publicly?

Where were those red lines when defamatory claims, racial slurs and personal attacks were being thrown at builders who have spent years building on Cardano?

Where was the concern for "bullying" then?

The standard cannot be:

When your side attacks, it is criticism.
When others ask questions, it is harassment.
When you escalate, it is leadership.
When people respond, they are victims.
When you use a 1M+ follower account, it is accountability.
When a dRep asks about conflicts, it is a mob.

That double standard is exactly why people are speaking up. You say people "lash out, get hit hard and then play the victim."

No.

People ask legitimate questions. You hit hard. Then you call their injuries proof that they were wrong to ask. That is the pattern.

A dRep raises a conflict of interest concern. You call it bullying. A project CEO disagrees with IOG proposals.
You call it spite. A community member challenges your narrative. You diagnose them, mock them, block them or write them off. Then, when people notice the pattern, you call them children.

Charles, the lack of self-reflection here is breathtaking.

At some point, when the same story keeps happening with different people, different projects, different dReps, different critics,and different cycles, maybe the common denominator is not that everyone else is irrational.

Maybe the common denominator is that you treat disagreement as disloyalty.

Maybe the common denominator is that you confuse criticism with attack.

Maybe the common denominator is that you cannot separate Cardano from yourself. That is dangerous in a decentralized ecosystem. Because Cardano does not belong to you.

It does not belong to IOG.
It does not belong to Iagon.
It does not belong to Midnight.
It does not belong to any ambassador group, any DRep bloc, any founder, any company or any whale.

It belongs to the $ADA holders and the people building, maintaining, securing, voting, delegating, questioning and participating in it.

And if those people cannot ask whether conflicts exist without being threatened, mocked, financially harmed or publicly targeted, then governance is not free.

You said "grow up kids." Here is the adult version:

Answer the question. Should dReps with roles, incentives, payments, affiliations or obligations connected to an organization seeking treasury funds disclose those overlaps and consider abstaining?
Yes or no?

That was the issue.

Not your ego.
Not my tone.
Not Iagon’s existence.
Not whether Midnight ambassadors are good people.
Not whether Charles feels attacked.
Not whether people should be afraid to ask next time.

The question was about conflict, disclosure and treasury integrity. If there is no conflict, explain why.
If there is a conflict, disclose it. If abstention is not necessary, make the case. If the Constitution already provides the standard, apply it equally. But do not turn a governance question into a loyalty test.

Do not demand apologies for asking what every serious governance system must be willing to ask.

Do not pretend you are defending decentralization while using centralized influence to punish dissent.

And do not tell people to "grow up" while threatening to burn projects down.

The Cardano community should be able to disagree without fear. dReps should be able to vote NO without being branded enemies. Builders should be able to compete without being targeted. Token holders should not become collateral damage in personality conflicts.

Ambassadors should be respected, yes. But they should not be used to make legitimate governance scrutiny off limits.

So yes, let's take inventory.

Who asked a governance question?
Who answered with escalation?
Who raised a possible conflict?
Who turned it into a campaign against a project?
Who claims to care about token holders?
Who publicly attacked leadership of a project whose holders are also Cardano community members?
Who says others play the victim?
Who keeps casting himself as the victim whenever accountability arrives?

That is the pattern people are seeing. And no amount of "grow up kids" changes it.

Iagon will continue building. I will continue voting my conscience as a dRep. I will continue asking questions when treasury neutrality, conflicts of interest and governance integrity are at stake.

If I am wrong, answer with facts. If you disagree, make the argument. But threats, mockery, blocks and public intimidation are not arguments. They are the behavior of someone who wants decentralized governance only until it decentralizes power away from him.

Cardano deserves better than that.

[COTI Foundation @COTInetwork]

See the COTI Privacy Portal in action 🎬
From public tokens → private tokens in a few clicks.

🦊 Connect MetaMask
🔐 Install COTI Snap
🔄 Portal in to unlock private tokens
Try the Portal 👉 https://t.co/G7n5Xj5QOm

Watch the demo 👇

[CipherTrade @CipherTradeApp]

The $COTI Privacy Portal has been integrated within the CipherTrade app, available on iOS testflight and Google Play for easy porting between Private and Public assets on mobile!

[COTI Foundation @COTInetwork]

Build COTI Blockchain Agent using SpoonOS and COTI MCP https://t.co/41aJUwdRdy

[Enterprise Ethereum Alliance | eea.eth @EntEthAlliance]

📣 The EEA Privacy Working Group is releasing its first report: "State of Privacy on Ethereum for Enterprise".

7 EEA member organizations and 1 comprehensive map of enterprise privacy on Ethereum.

More on what this means 🧵⬇️

[COTI Foundation @COTInetwork]

https://t.co/TaZ5FpMTSe