For 3 years now, I have worked on a digital education system that allows accessible, engaged and personal learning experiences whether a student is on campus or remote. This approach is now essential. I use @surface, @MicrosoftTeams & @msonenote in concert https://t.co/SRPPcj18If
The difference is in 2009 you needed to explain what an app was. Now you need to explain why your AI wrapper isn't just a thin prompt layer over GPT-4 with a 100x markup.
If you think you are smarter than the previous generation...
50 years ago the owners manual of a car showed you how to adjust the valves. Today it warns you not to drink the contents of the battery.
@CCguerilla@NonwayneWayne Having read only the headline, it presents an obvious false dichotomy: if students are not a 'special interest group brought in at the last minute', it does not, ipso facto, imply they must be partners in end-to-end design.
@Neal_Geach@NonwayneWayne@CCguerilla@DrKellermann There've been some studies done on the correlation between student satisfaction and student learning. There is essentially none. Some good teachers are entertaining. Others are boring. Likewise bad teachers.
Always going to repost this kind of sentiment because universities are abandoning expertise in favour of skills. Skills advocates have poisoned our disciplines and undermined the rich expertise that was once found in our universities
@roryisconfused@CCguerilla What I mean is if you go to a restaurant you would never pay for a glass of tap water, because you have the same tap at home and it costs basically nothing. If journal articles, PhDs and books are written by genAI then they are ostensibly worthless. If not yet then eventually.
@roryisconfused@CCguerilla One argument is that we sound like folks 100 years ago saying horses are still better than motor cars because cars break down, etc. GenAI will get better. The deeper argument is that it is and will continue to devalue the written word, and that we all have the same genAI spigot.