@jagchat01@svembu Of course we must do all of the above, we are a responsible democracy. But, along with that we must also release a comparative data of all health parameters from the pre vs post vaccination era. Then, the same parents will come running to get their children vaccinated...
At this point this is just sad. People with a science degree shouldn’t be speaking like this.
1. “Professors of Immunology had reservations 15 years ago…”
Science evolves - that’s the point. Fifteen years ago, mRNA technology was in early stages, adjuvant safety data was smaller, and combination-schedule research was ongoing. Those same “professors” today would acknowledge that decades of data now support both safety and efficacy. Using outdated opinions to discredit current consensus is like quoting a surgeon from 1980 to argue against laparoscopic surgery.
2. “Doctors are silent because they’ll be attacked.”
Or because they understand the difference between scientific scrutiny and conspiracy rhetoric. Medicine thrives on challenge - real researchers publish data, present at conferences, and invite peer review. People who “stay silent” in public but gossip privately usually lack evidence strong enough to withstand that scrutiny.
3. “I speak for those who can’t.”
You’re not giving them a voice - you’re giving them plausible deniability. If there were legitimate large-scale evidence contradicting vaccine safety, it would be in journals, not in tweets prefaced with “I can’t name them but trust me.”
4. “We need an org in India to support dissenting doctors.”
We already have that - it’s called the scientific method. It rewards reproducible data, not anecdotal fear. Anyone can challenge the consensus, but the burden of proof lies with the challenger, not the data that’s already been verified across millions of doses and global monitoring systems.
5. “I’m a reasonably informed layman and have the right to speak.”
Of course you do. But having the right to an opinion doesn’t make it right. Medicine isn’t a democracy of feelings, it’s a meritocracy of evidence. Freedom of speech isn’t freedom from factual accountability.
6. “Stay in your lane is arrogance and credentialism.”
No, it’s humility before expertise. We defer to pilots to fly planes and engineers to build bridges because specialized knowledge matters. If you wouldn’t take flying lessons from someone who’s only “reasonably informed” about aerodynamics, why would you take immunological advice from one?
Science doesn’t silence people, it filters noise. If your evidence can survive peer review, publish it. If not, it’s not censorship, it’s quality control.
5000 new MBBS seats makes no sense when:
• You can’t provide employment to the already existing doctors where for 1 post almost 1000 doctors are in queue .
• Majority of the existing colleges lack appropriate teaching faculties , Broken college buildings and unhygienic living conditions with fake registered doctors for fake NMC inspections .
• When you are made to Work for 24- 36 hours duty shifts literally destroying your Testosterone levels and estrogen levels with telomere shortening leading to early aging .
• Even if you clear NEET PG , Wait for months to start counselling and then work under bonded slavery in majority states allowing the toxic dept to harass you because NMC grievance portal is poorer than 1920s post card service .
It has already been more than a month of NEET PG results announcement but the counselling process hasn’t started yet
Forget about NEET PG , even NEET SS doctors are struggling for proper examination and the case has even reached court .
No matter who is the new NMC chairman , or whether you rename MCI as NMC
The corruption in the form of cancer is so deep rooted inside it you need chemotherapy and surgical resection to manage it .