The Telegraph front page reports Iran is smuggling its operatives into Britain via the English Channel.
I have been warning about this since April.
https://t.co/7m20PB0BIL
The BBC are running a disgraceful hit piece against me & will be hearing from my lawyers.
It appears to be carefully coordinated & politically motivated within an hour of yet another Sunday Times story against Reform.
Is it a coincidence the Met leadership are briefing against me to the BBC, just after we have confirmed our legal action against the NCA over their possible multiple criminal offences?
No one has ever been in touch with me on this matter except the BBC today!
The Establishment are playing dirtier than ever to try to smear & discredit Reform leaders
Peter is not correct about me in this case.
I have always known that dangers from Earth will also pose dangers to Mars. Obviously so. However, the immense difficulty of traveling to Mars means that there is a much higher likelihood of mitigating risks originating from Earth.
A clear example of major risk reduction would be a deadly pandemic. Since it takes 6 months to reach Mars, there is an automatic 6 month quarantine!
Even traveling at the speed of light, a deadly computer virus or AI attack can potentially be stopped due to Mars being ~4 to ~20 light-minutes from Earth.
This doesn’t mean that a Mars civilization eliminates all risk, but it absolutely greatly reduces the risk of consciousness being extinguished.
Moreover, Mars is a stepping stone to extending consciousness broadly within our solar system and ultimately to millions of stars within our galaxy, which would extend the probable lifespan of consciousness as we know it by many orders of magnitude.
That said, what I personally find most motivating is not the risk reduction aspect of extending life beyond Earth, but rather the inspiring nature of exploration and being out there among the stars!
Perhaps we will meet aliens or find the remains of long-dead civilizations that lasted millions of years …
While Andy Burhnham distracts you with Tiktoks about crisps, to a fawning media establishment, he is quietly briefing the Guardian that he will U-turn on the retrospective reforms to Indefinite Leave to Remain.
This will mean the WHOLE Boriswave of 4 million non-EU unskilled migrants will get to stay and get lifetime access to our welfare state in the next few years.
Do you understand what’s happening?
The Economist's editor-in-chief Zanny Minton Beddoes went to a private all-girls boarding school in Shropshire where fees run up to £45,000 per year (about $60,000).
She was born and raised in Shropshire, one of England's most affluent rural counties. She attacks @elonmusk saying he's wrong and the UK is thriving. Elon hits back that she lives a cloistered existence.
He's absolutely right. She's Oxford and Harvard educated. She doesn't live in the towns where migrant grooming gangs operate. She can't see the destruction from her ivory tower.
So many elites in this country and Europe are removed from the decay their leftist policies have brought. Good on @elonmusk for calling her out.
Whether Elon’s @elonmusk behaviour is right or wrong does not rest on the number of people who like or loathe him. 🤔
That’s her argument - and he rightly says ‘he doesn’t care’.
It is precisely because politicians (across the political spectrum) try to be popular, rather than doing what is right, that we have poor decisions made.
Leadership requires backbone.
One of the reasons I am so against wealth taxes is that they cross a line of giving government the power to seize property.
Wealth is something people build with after-tax money. They earn, pay tax and then take a risk and invest their savings. That is the mechanism for creating wealth whether it be starting a business or buying and improving assets.
Once you finally succeed, wealth taxes allow the government to simply reach into your life, put a value on what you own and take it. They are literally seizing your property. Property you own because of money you first earned and paid tax on.
This is different in an important way from income tax. Income tax happens as you earn and … importantly…. you can choose to stop earning at any point if you want to.
If a Government chose to tax income at 50% and you didn’t want to pay it, you could simply withhold your labour and choose not work.
Not the same with a wealth tax - once you own it, it’s not actually yours… at any point the government can simply adjust the rate of wealth tax and remove it from you.
Wealth tax is fundamental a breach in the principle of your right to own property.
It’s also a slippery slope. Every tax is brought in as “only for the rich” and pretty soon it’s on everyone.
There will be a situation whereby 51% of the population can simply vote to take everything away from the 49% who have more to take. Very reliably once there is a breach in the right to own property it descends into mob rule.
The wealthy aren’t silly, they know this is the case and respond by removing all investment and wealth out of any country that breaches the principle of ownership of property.
So @garyseconomics asks what I’m thinking? I’m thinking that a wealth tax is breach in the fundamental principle of the right to own property and a pathway to mob rule. If we are lucky it will do more harm to an economy than good. If it really takes off it will crash the economy.
The Crown Prosecution Service has confirmed our dear friend Ann Widdecombe was eating lunch when Joshua Kerry allegedly arrived at her house and entered through the front door.
He then allegedly hit her on the head with a hammer 21 times.
Before allegedly driving off.
Why did the police and Keir Starmer tell Nigel Farage it was a “burglary gone wrong”?
The authorities had better preserve all files and records.
As Home Secretary in a Reform government I will take a keen interest in all communications in those initial hours.
I will ensure the public learns the truth.
When you look past the two tier judiciary, the cost of living increases, the diminished relationship with the US, David Lammy, the failure to implement the Supreme Court ruling on women only spaces, the restarting of the trial of puberty blockers, the closure of 100 private schools, siding with Hamas, the murders of Wayne Broadhurst, Henry Nowak,Rhiannon Whyte, the hosepipe bans, the pissing rain, the appointment of Peter Mandelson, the Chagos Islands surrender, the battle to bring an Egyptian terrorist to the UK and give him citizenship, the prosecution of veterans, the bombing of UK sovereign territory in Cyprus with no response, closure of our last blast furnace, youth unemployment that would shame a Spaniard, the Chinese Embassy being hooked up to MI6s servers, twenty Ministerial resignations, the return of James Corden from the US, Mrs Browns Boys recommissioned, the a303 remaining unwidened, the tax take hitting a record high and still borrowing grew, a third of our electricity coming from foreigners, GB Energy, taxing farmers to suicide, rape gangs being replenished in every town and city, apart from that Lewis it has felt we've just lived through a golden age. You pillock.
I gommoni di Sea Watch beccati da aereo Frontex mentre trasbordano i clandestini dal motoscafo dei colleghi trafficanti. Non sono salvataggi ma trasbordi su appuntamento. Comandante indagato.
So the rules are Reform MPs - fearing for their lives - cannot even insinuate that the brutal murder of their colleague may have been a targeted attack - even when it was obvious from the start.
But the Labour Home Secretary, PM, incoming PM, Police, the BBC and entire establishment media can instantly speculate wildly and loudly about a “right wing” terrorist plot on an Islamic event -
only for the it to be proven totally false.
This is Britain in 2026.
This is why Britain needs REFORM.
Andy, the police say they “found no evidence to support anyone being charged with any offences linked to the alleged threat.”
Why did you instantly speculate about something so serious?
Is it because you only care about “hatred” towards groups you think will vote for you?
Mi aggredisci. Mi difendo. E dovrei risarcirti io? Non è giusto.
Con l’ultimo DDL Sicurezza introduciamo una regola di puro buon senso: chi subisce un danno mentre sta commettendo un reato non può chiedere alcun risarcimento, né possono farlo i suoi familiari.
Chi viola la legge non può pretendere di essere risarcito da chi si è difeso.
Lo Stato sta dalla parte delle persone perbene. Non dei criminali.