If
- you’d been privately educated; and
- you educated your children privately; and
- you got to choose the topics you wanted to air…
Wouldn’t you choose another topic, rather than voluntarily choosing to say this, knowing how anyone will react?!
@bphillipsonMP You say that private school pupils have an “unfair advantage” over state school kids - is that simply because they are independent of your control?
@MartinSLewis Leaving aside the ideology of taxing education, is VAT on independent school fees not a personal finance fairness issue?
Families planned for years, then faced a sudden 20% tax on school fees.
Does this fall within your remit as a financial fairness campaigner?
@Rebecca_SPaul She says “private schools” instead of “independent schools” for a reason.
It is deliberate- to make parental choice sound like privilege, then tax it.
We see the trick. Taxing education is always wrong.
@johndotwills Sultana didn’t even go to her local comprehensive- she went to a grammar school. Unclear why she thinks Prince George should go to a comprehensive when she/her parents decided it wasn’t good enough for her.
@ISC_schools@katie74RT VAT is a tax on consumer spending, added to goods and services and ultimately paid by the customer. Education is not ordinary consumption. Adding VAT to private school fees looks less like fairness or consistency, and more like political motivation posing as tax policy.
@MichelleDewbs Apparently, they were wearing the finest quality ladies clothing, made by two wandering tailors, of a magical silk cloth that ONLY INTELLIGENT people can see - sorry Michelle… 😉
@KemiBadenoch@anaboultertv Keir Starmer looks like a tone-deaf conductor trying to lead an orchestra where Reeves Miliband Philipson et Al are playing their own tunes. John Healey and the Al Carns are warning that the rest are out of time. Tap the baton PM - or let someone else conduct.
This year the Home Office moved to stop expert sheep shearers from Australia and New Zealand coming to shear British sheep.
The people who keep the animals comfortable were declared surplus to requirements.
For over a decade, around 75 of the best shearers on earth have flown in each spring on a simple visa concession. In a few brutal weeks they take the wool off up to two million sheep.
A top shearer clears a ewe in two or three minutes. Hundreds a day. Calm hands, no panic in the animal. It is a global trade and a young body's game, and Britain has never grown enough of its own.
The official line? Fourteen years to train Britons, so the door is closing.
Here is what that tidy sentence ignores. A sheep must be shorn every year or she overheats, cannot move properly, and gets eaten alive by flies and maggots. Shearing on time is welfare, plain and simple, written into law and into the animal's own skin.
So a government that lectures farmers without pause about welfare has quietly made the most basic welfare task harder to carry out. After the outcry they allowed one "final" year. Then the experts are gone for good.
A sector already losing money on every fleece, already burning wool it cannot sell, now told it cannot even get the people in to take the wool off.
You could be forgiven for thinking somebody wants the British sheep gone.