Dale Swartz

[Clandestine @WarClandestine]

In addition to the facts, we have a logical argument that no one has ever been able to refute.

If Trump was implicated with Epstein, the Dems would not have needed to concoct the Russia hoax or any of the other lies about Trump.

If Trump was implicated, why didn’t the Dems mention Epstein a single time before 2016, 2020, during Biden’s term when they had control, or 2024? Why did they have to try to indict Trump for process crimes, the phony documents raid, and other nonsense?

Mueller looked under every single stone, investigated every person Trump ever came in contact with, and was looking for a reason to slap something on Trump. He found nothing. Trump is literally the single most vetted person in history.

If there was ever anything about Trump, the Dems would have released it before Trump won 2016, but there was never anything about Trump, hence why they had to make shit up.

The reason why the Democrat elite never brought up Epstein, is because Epstein was part of the Democrat elite, which is confirmed via Epstein’s email history. The Dems never wanted to bring any attention to Epstein, but Trump did before the 2016 election.

If Trump was implicated in crimes with Epstein, why would Trump bring up Epstein and Bill’s time on the island?

It’s a simple matter of logic that cannot be refuted. If there was ever any dirt on Trump, Obama’s cronies like Comey and Brennan would have leaked it, and Epstein never would have been covered up in the first place.

[Dale Swartz @drswartz3908]

@PSUBarstool Everyone pushing for Terry Smith can sit down now.

[Penn State Football @PennStateFball]

GEAR PACK GIVEAWAY 👀

1⃣ Follow @CoachJFranklin
2⃣ Follow @ROARPlusPSU
3⃣ Repost to WIN!

#WeAre | https://t.co/nfJ1FV9eao

[Barry Cunningham @barrycunningham]

HERE'S THE "CLEAN" VERSION OF FAFO!

[Dale Swartz @drswartz3908]

@libsoftiktok All other Arizona counties need to withhold reporting their results until Maricopa county does.

[I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 @ImMeme0]

I don’t care in you are in Montana or any other state.

This report by @robbystarbuck MUST go viral!

Support Purple Heart recipient @SheehyforMT in his bid to win a majority in the United States Senate.

[Dale Swartz @drswartz3908]

@landon_tengwall Kaden Saunders, needs to get healthy.

[Dale Swartz @drswartz3908]

@wideawake_media I’m curious, how much waste would be created from Nuclear power plants generating the same amount of electricity?

[Dale Swartz @drswartz3908]

@PSU_Strong I appreciate everything Brent Pry did at Penn State but the soft zone coverages and bend but don’t break style of his defenses was often frustrating. We are in a much better place now.

[Dale Swartz @drswartz3908]

@ThomasFrankCarr Re: Julian Fleming, at least on the Tyler Warren TD Julian was going to be wide open as well. He ran hard all day and did all the little things well, he will get his.

[Owen Gregorian @OwenGregorian]

MIT & Princeton Scientists: ‘More carbon dioxide cannot cause catastrophic global warming or more extreme weather’ – Net Zero Policies Will Have Disastrous Effects on People Worldwide | CO2 Coalition

Richard Lindzen
Professor of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Emeritus
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

William Happer
Professor of Physics, Emeritus
Princeton University

The United States and countries worldwide are vigorously pursuing regulations and subsidies to reduce carbon dioxide emissions to Net Zero by 2050 on the assumption, best stated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), that the “evidence is clear that carbon dioxide (CO2) is the main driver of climate change” and is “responsible for more than 50% of the change.”

We are career physicists with a special expertise in radiation physics, which describes how CO2 affects heat flow in Earth’s atmosphere.  The physics of carbon dioxide is that CO2’s ability to warm the planet is determined by its ability to absorb heat, which decreases rapidly as CO2’s concentration in the atmosphere increases.  This scientific fact about CO2 changes everything about the common view of CO2 and climate change.

Carbon Dioxide is Now a Weak Greenhouse Gas. At today’s CO2 concentration in the atmosphere of approximately 420 parts per million, additional amounts of CO2 have little ability to absorb heat and therefore is now a weak greenhouse gas.  At higher concentrations in the future, the ability of future increases to warm the planet will be even smaller.  This also means that the common assumption that carbon dioxide is “the main driver of climate change” is scientifically false.

In short, more carbon dioxide cannot cause catastrophic global warming or more extreme weather.  Neither can greenhouse gases of methane or nitrous oxide, the levels of which are so small that they are irrelevant to climate.

Referring to additional atmospheric CO2 as “carbon pollution” is complete nonsense. More CO2 does no harm. Quite the contrary, it does two good things for humanity: (1) It provides a slight and beneficial increase in temperature, much less than natural fluctuations. (2) It creates more food for people worldwide, which we cover further below.

Implications

First. Net Zero Efforts Will Have a Trivial Effect on Temperature. More of the atmospheric greenhouse gas, CO2, will increase temperature, but only slightly. How changes in atmospheric greenhouse gases affect radiation transfer are described by precise physical equations that have never failed to describe observations of the real world.

We applied these formulas to the massive efforts by the U. S. and worldwide to reduce CO2 emissions to Net Zero by 2050 in a paper that we recommend to those with a technical background.[1] We show that all the efforts to achieve Net Zero emissions of carbon dioxide, if fully implemented, will have a trivial effect on temperature:

- United States Net Zero by 2050 — only avoids a temperature increase of 2/100 °F (0. 02 °F) with no positive feedback, and only 6/100°F (0.06 °F) with positive feedback of 4 that is typically built into the models of the United Nations International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

- Worldwide Net Zero by 2050 — only avoids a temperature increase of 13/100 (0.13 °F), or 50/100 °F (0.50 °F) with a factor of 4 positive feedback.
These numbers are trivial, but the cost of achieving them would be disastrous to people worldwide.

Second.  Net Zero Policies Will Be Disastrous for People Worldwide. In the United States and worldwide, Net Zero regulations and subsidies will have disastrous effects. Chief among them would be the proposed elimination of fossil fuels, which would mean doing away with internal combustion engines for transportation and other uses, the power plants that provide most of the world’s electricity, gas space heaters and cooking stoves and the feedstocks for nitrogen fertilizers that enable the feeding of nearly half the global population. The resulting economic devastation would include massive job losses, which already has occurred in places where Net Zero subsidies and regulations have diverted capital away from investments into productive assets and into ineffective technologies such as wind and solar energy.

Those hostile to fossil fuels ignore overwhelming evidence that the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide from their combustion has significantly greened Earth and boosted crop production.

In addition, various countries will require electric vehicles (EVs), heat pumps and electric appliances be purchased.  They will require companies to report information on carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases emissions.  However, since more carbon dioxide causes trivial and beneficial warming, this data is immaterial, misleading and very expensive.  It should not be required.

Third.  More Carbon Dioxide Means More Food.  Contrary to common reporting, more carbon dioxide increases the amount of food available to people worldwide, and is particularly helpful in drought-stricken areas.  Doubling carbon dioxide to 800 ppm, for example. will increase global food supplies by approximately 60%[2].

Thus, carbon dioxide emissions should not be reduced, but increased to provide more food worldwide. Moreover, there is no risk of catastrophic global warming or extreme weather because carbon dioxide is now a weak greenhouse gas.  Reducing carbon dioxide emissions will reduce the amount of food available to people worldwide and produce no benefit to the climate.

Fourth.  Fossil Fuels Must Not Be Eliminated.  Net Zero requires that fossil fuels be eliminated because they account for about 90% of human-induced CO2 emissions. However, the elimination of fossil fuels will have no effect on the climate since carbon dioxide is now a weak greenhouse gas. The use of fossil fuels must not be eliminated and should be expanded because they (1) provide more carbon dioxide which makes more food, (2) are used to make nitrogen fertilizer that enables the feeding of about half of the world’s population, and (3) provide reliable and inexpensive energy for people everywhere, especially for the two-thirds of the world’s population without adequate access to electricity.[3]

Conclusion.  All Net Zero carbon dioxide regulations and subsidies in the United States and worldwide must be stopped as soon as possible to avoid disastrous effects on Americans, America, and people worldwide, especially in developing countries.

https://t.co/LaRgTuAMgJ

[Dale Swartz @drswartz3908]

@teammoreno2024 I already know about your opponent, where are the ads describing your positions and what you stand for? You have your own skeletons to deal with, why exactly should someone vote for you?

[I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 @ImMeme0]

The man speaks with the common sense that resonates with most of us.🔥🔥🔥

[Dale Swartz @drswartz3908]

@iamnot_elon 100%

[Dale Swartz @drswartz3908]

@usanews0 I didn’t really need any incentives but…….

[Sean Davis @seanmdav]

As I said repeatedly during the Russia hoax: unless and until everyone involved goes to prison, the behavior will only escalate.

What happened to the Russia hoaxers? Nothing, so they weaponized a virus against their own country. They burned down our cities. They stole an election. And when you committed the crime of noticing, they staged a fake insurrection and tried to jail YOU for calling out their lies.

But that wasn’t enough for them. And why would it be, when they never paid a price for their war on this country?

They raided Trump’s home, guns drawn. And nothing happened. So they arrested him and tried to put him in prison, and nothing happened to them.

And when all their previous failed efforts resulted in ZERO negative consequences for any of the orchestrators, what did they do?

They tried to murder Donald Trump. And then they lied about that and tried to blame YOU for their own eight-year-long operation to get Trump killed.

If you are a member of Congress or a Republican official, I want you to pay very special attention to what I’m about to say: you need to wake the F up.

Seriously. Wake up and pull your heads out of your own backsides. Your incompetence and cowardice are a major reason we find ourselves in this position today. Wake up, sack up, and grow a spine.

Stop sending letters. Stop issuing stern statements written by 22-year-old staffers. Stop all of it and start putting people in prison.

They will not stop escalating. They will not stop trying to kill us. They will not stop destroying the country until they start paying the price for their treason.

Put these people in prison, or lose your country—and maybe even your lives, given what these demons have shown they’re willing to do to gain and maintain power.

Until these people are forced to spend their lives in prison, the insanity will not stop. And your refusal to make that happen doesn’t make you a statesman. It doesn’t make you above it all. It makes you a coward.

So stop with the empty words and start doing your freaking job for once.

[Dale Swartz @drswartz3908]

@_VishwajitPatil @everymovieplug Longmire, Yellowstone

[NEWSMAX @NEWSMAX]

"This makes me want to stop paying taxes."

On Wednesday's "Carl Higbie FRONTLINE," @CarlHigbie torched the 'woke crap' culture of the left.

[Dale Swartz @drswartz3908]

@BelannF This just means that the climate action group has become too visible. Pay attention to where the money goes instead of

[SportsDay Cowboys @dmn_cowboys]

RT to wish a HAPPY 82nd BIRTHDAY to Roger Staubach!! 🎂

(via @NFL)