Eric, you've now written two lengthy explanations about why you refuse to explain yourself.
Nobody needs your entire meeting schedule. You voluntarily admitted acting as an intermediary for wealthy pro-Israel Americans seeking access to prominent critics.
Asking who funded the invitation and what they wanted isn't harassment. It's scrutiny.
Instead, you resort to ridicule, strawmen, deflection, and now victimhood. You invoke antisemitism, portray yourself as persecuted, and blame “the Arabs” while avoiding the actual questions.
That's an impressive amount of political theater for someone who claims not to be in the denial business. Victimhood is not accountability, and deflection is not an answer.
I suppose now we should ask the obvious question:
If Dave and Ian said no, who all has said yes?
And a follow-up of whether there was a noticeable shift in their content after the visit.
NEW: ICE has deleted at least 2 social media posts defending its agents' violent January arrest of Minneapolis resident Aliya Rahman, who sued the U.S. govt on Tuesday for abuse by ICE.
DHS won't say when -- or why -- they were erased.
I got screenshots. https://t.co/A1eCQG3cqC
Dave Smith revealed that the individual who reached out to him on behalf of Israel was Eric Weinstein.
Ian Carroll came out and said he did the same with him.
Both Dave and Ian refused. I wonder who has said yes.
Interestingly, these messages are dated April 2025. The Dave Smith and Douglas Murray debate was also April 2025. Charlie Kirk wrote a letter to Bibi Netanyahu dated May 2, 2025. Charlie refused Bibi too during this timeframe.
Clearly Israeli intelligence was monitoring very closely what was going on amongst American influencers.
Weinstein says "they" or "people" want to talk to you. Who are "they?"