dscott578

[dscott578 @dscott578]

@ABitSalty365 @libsoftiktok @MSpecialBrewing dumb take

[dscott578 @dscott578]

@DecodingFoxNews No one here cared about Biden's decline.

[James O'Keefe @JamesOKeefeIII]

OMG has sent everything over to @DAGToddBlanche's office from our NJ Antifa sting operations. Looking forward to helping in anyway we can to provide accountability.

@TheJusticeDept

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

Hello Mr. Hunter Biden,

You're getting six-digit likes on every post lately. I don't have any hope to ratio you or whatever through traditional "Hello" means.

But for those uninitiated, those who are captivated by your fake-humble persona obviously PR-engineered to capture unsuspecting disaffected Republicans:

You are not some humility, witty guy turning over a new leaf. You are the ultimate proof of nepotism, everything that the so-called "Epstein Class" is supposed to represent.

Let me explain - off the top of my head.

You were a board member of USGLC. U.S. Global Leadership Coalition. The most powerful NGO that nobody's ever heard of. Last year, I documented in several threads, how Liz Schrayer, USGLC lead, took credit for ramming through a 90 billion dollar bill for Ukraine in 2024, even as @mattvanswol demonstrated that Western North Carolina got zero help in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene because FEMA threw up their hands and said they ran out of funds.

USGLC, arguably, is the most powerful NGO that nobody has ever heard of. It includes a bunch of corporations, a bunch of nonprofit leads, and ... for some magical reason, I documented, extensively, linked, that Liz Schrayer started pursuing you in 2012. During the Obama years, when you were Biden's son. Are you a former Secretary of State? No. Are you a CEO of a Fortune 500 company? No. That puts you below the average USGLC board member, by a good tier.

So what DID get you on USGLC? The only reason: that you were the son of a sitting Vice President known for corruption, and you yourself were known for corruption.

You are not "folksy." You are the worst of the worst of the elite. Most of the elite, at least, get their credentials through Georgetown/George Washington/Harvard Kennedy. You got yours purely on nepotism. Any photographs you have of yourself at motels is proof that you are so incompetent that you waste all your money, not that you come from humble beginnings. Because others like @MarcoPolo501c3 have thoroughly documented that you benefited a great deal from your nepotism.

You even tried to bait those in with saying you prefer to keep immigration "legal" - but we all know the trap that keeps illegal immgrants here: outlaw deportations, and make every immigrant case "asylum", and magically, everyone who might've been here illegally a few years ago is legal.

You may get 175K likes on your semi-subverting, PR-designed photographs. But those of us who know, know you're fake.

https://t.co/vMml22uCbu

[Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok]

Looks like an insurrection to me

I was reliably informed that this is a threat to Democracy…

Hunt them down and lock them all up in solitary

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

New York Post columnist Miranda Devine reveals that old Twitter leadership worked with the FBI so closely to suppress the Hunter Biden Laptop story, that they classified all links to the story as “child porn” to stop it from being shared

“It was completely blacklisted on Twitter in 2 hours. It was classified as child porn internally, if you like, sent it in a private, like if I DM'd you privately, the link, it would disable as it would if you were sending something criminal. The reason why it was so immediate and so severe was because the FBI was briefing Twitter executives”

This would instantly flag the DMs and stop them from being sent, it would make the links inactive

She also reveals that the FBI knew about the laptop all the way back before the first Trump impeachment

Literally treason. No one in old Twitter has been held accountable either

[Mister Knauf 👹🌎 @daniel_knauf]

@libsoftiktok @JimSatala @washingtonpost

[Ed Burke @EdBurke85403199]

@eastbaycitizen “Hi, I’m Steven Tavares, a journalist who knew Eric Swalwell has been a sexual predator for more than a decade but I’m only acknowledging it now because a Republican might be elected governor of CA if we don’t get Swalwell out of the race.”

[Skiandsurf @Skiandsurf2]

@eastbaycitizen

[Pro America Politics @proamericapol]

How ruthlessly effective is the Democrat machine?

Eric Swalwell is asked to drop out of the race because a Republicans may actually win.

He refuses.

Party operatives tap into their pool of white liberal feminists and just like that, he's hit with not one...not two, but FOUR sexual assault accusations.

Of course, none of the victims can remember any details, just that it happened. The exact Blasey-Ford and E. Jean Carrol playbook.

Within an hour, the victim is being interviewed on @CNN.

The email goes out.

Almost immediately, the teacher's union is condemning him and Schumer, Pelosi, Jeffries and every other Democrat on Twitter is calling for him to drop out of the race.

Keep in mind, when Tara Reade accused Biden of forcibly sexually abusing her, they called her a liar and nobody called for him to drop out.

This is all a coordinated attack because they've seen the internal polling that Steve Hilton may actually win this thing and they are sacrificing Swalwell because liberal idiots like him are a dime a dozen.

[dscott578 @dscott578]

@JackBircht @Microinteracti1 @KurtSchlichter Hahahahahahah!!!! You're stupid! Hahahahah!!! No intelligent retort., just an attempt at insults. Lame.

[dscott578 @dscott578]

@Microinteracti1 @KurtSchlichter Don't watch cnn. Trump did not cuddle up to enemies and he will not coddle weak allies. European folks need to see that.

[MERICA MEMED @Mericamemed]

Now this is one wild story. The amount of lawsuits coming down the pipeline with stories like this is going to be astronomical.

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

Hello Representative Levin,

I'd like to introduce you to an organization called the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.

NDI is one of the four core institutes of the National Endowment for Democracy, established by Congress in 1983. It is the Democratic Party's official international arm. Its board members include Stacey Abrams, Donna Brazile, and Michael McFaul. Its previous chair was Madeleine Albright, who served until her death in 2022. Also on the board: Eric Kessler, founder of Arabella Advisors, the largest dark money network in Democratic politics.
NDI reported $181.5 million in revenue in fiscal year 2023, nearly all in government grants.

NDI's mission, for four decades, has been to tell countries around the world how to run democratic elections. And what NDI consistently tells them, across dozens of countries, is that voter identification is a fundamental pillar of election integrity, and that proving citizenship is a basic prerequisite for participation.

Here is what NDI has demanded of other countries:

NDI's foundational guide, Building Confidence in the Voter Registration Process (2001), describes voter ID systems as standard democratic infrastructure. It states that voter registries should contain "voters' photographs and even their fingerprints" and that registered voters should be issued "a voter or other ID card that serves as proof of their right to vote." NDI explains that "issuing ID cards, either national or voting, requires a second point of contact between election officials and voters, which introduces an additional safeguard into the system." (pp. 10–11, 15)

NDI's 2015 study of voter registration across the Middle East and North Africa goes further, laying out that voters must "prove their identity, essentially demonstrating that they are who they say they are" and must "affirm their citizenship and age." (p. 11)

That same 2001 guide identifies married name changes as a routine voter roll maintenance challenge: "Election officials must update information about people who have moved or who have married and changed their surname." NDI also notes that voter lists "may omit information about changes of address or name for those eligible people who have recently moved or married." NDI's recommendation is not to eliminate voter ID. It is to maintain clean, continuously updated voter rolls that accommodate name changes within the system.

In its 2009 Bangladesh report, NDI praised the country's new photo-voter list and national ID card system, noting that the ID cards gave "a sense of empowerment and belonging to the disadvantaged and marginalized people of the country, particularly women."

Read that again. NDI itself called voter identification empowering for WOMEN!

In every case, NDI's position was identical: marriage-related name changes are a solvable administrative problem. The solution is better record-keeping and updated systems. Not fewer safeguards. Not the elimination of voter ID.

Your party's own international arm has already solved the problem you bring up. The answer is: maintain the rolls. Update the records. Issue the IDs. Accommodate name changes within the system, don't use them as a reason to have no system at all.

The exact opposite of what you push here - refusing to clean voter rolls.

By NDI’s own standards, by the standards of your own international soft power branch, YOUR position is the anti-feminist position.

The SAVE America Act asks Americans to do less than what NDI demands of Nicaragua, less than what NDI praises in Morocco, and far less than the biometric fingerprint-and-facial-recognition system NDI supervised in Nigeria. Eighty-four percent of Americans support photo ID to vote. Two-thirds of Democrats support it. Jimmy Carter's own 2005 bipartisan commission recommended it.

You voted no. Your party's international arm, funded with taxpayer money, chaired by your party's former Senate leader (Tom Daschle), staffed by your party's most prominent voting-rights advocate, says yes. For everyone else.

NDI's guides are publicly available on their website. You might consider reading them before you spout mindless drivel to protect your own grift.

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

A lot more coming on this!

[dscott578 @dscott578]

@GavinNewsom Trash response from a trash organization

[Clay Travis @ClayTravis]

No sports media member has ever written an article criticizing a championship team for taking a congratulatory call from a president or visiting the White House when a Democrat was in office. The far left wing bias in sports media is truly insane.

[Dave Rubin @RubinReport]

Don’t forget he then sold his failed TV network, CurrentTV, to Qatar for 500 million dollars.

The word “grifter” is overused these days, but it should be stamped on this guy’s head in oil.

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

Hello Mr. Ornstein,

"Shameless liar." Bold words from someone who used that exact phrase about Mitch McConnell in Bloomberg back in June 2013. It's a rhetorical weapon you've been carrying for a decade.

But since you've introduced the concept of shameless misrepresentation, let's talk.

I've spent the last several months building a research system with access to IRS 990 filings, 990-PF records, FEC data, and an entity resolution pipeline that cross-references every nonprofit in the country against grant flows. One of the first things I did was identify root funder networks and cluster them... because the same families love obscuring their trails across dozens of pass-through vehicles.

I ran you through it... as a funded operative.

Here's the exact output:
Campaign Legal Center (EIN 04-3608387)
You are a trustee. Your organization's top funders, per IRS filings:

• Sherwood Foundation: $12M — that's Susie Buffett's progressive philanthropy vehicle
• Open Society Foundations (George Soros): confirmed funder
• MacArthur Foundation: $5MM
• Democracy Fund (Pierre Omidyar): $3.475MM
• Ford Foundation: Almost $3MM
• Rockefeller Family Fund: $210K

You routinely comment on election law and voting rights — issues the CLC actively litigates — without disclosing that you chair the board of a Soros/Buffett/Omidyar-funded organization with direct financial interests in those same policy outcomes.

You sit on a task force - "Protect Democracy — National Task Force on Election Crises." Protect Democracy was founded in 2017 by Ian Bassin, Obama's White House counsel, explicitly to oppose Trump. This is not a nonpartisan advisory role.

"One Nation After Trump: A Guide for the Perplexed, the Disillusioned, the Desperate, and the Not-Yet-Deported" (2017)
You co-authored this with E.J. Dionne, the Washington Post's flagship liberal opinion columnist. The subtitle has "Not-Yet Deported" in it. Enough said. @ItsYourGov, between Mr. Ornstein and Professor Nichols, how many "fake conservatives" do we have that promise they'd be pure and perfect and accepting of mass migration only if Trump didn't exist?

But that's not all.

Your own words, American Jewish World, April 2021: "I've had complete freedom there... I am and have been a fair outlier."

That's you, describing your own relationship to AEI, the "conservative think tank" credential you deploy every time you want media to quote "even AEI agrees." AEI itself published a piece by another scholar saying you "have it exactly backward" on Republican politics.

So here's the picture:

You present as a nonpartisan AEI scholar. You chair the board of a Soros-funded election law organization. You sit on an explicitly anti-Trump task force. You co-wrote a resistance manual with a liberal Washington Post columnist. And you've been calling Republican politicians "shameless liars" since 2013.

You don't get to call Mike Lee a liar about a polling number while your entire professional identity is built on a credential you've spent 14 years quietly hollowing out.

The word you're looking for isn't "liar," Mr. Ornstein.

It's mirror.