A recent NYT article by @CadeMetz [1] claims that neural network distillation was first developed in 2015 by a team of Google researchers including G. Hinton [2]. Not true! I published the technique in 1991 [3]. [2] failed to cite [3]. See the overviews [4][6].
The NYT article [1] states: "... distillation is an effort to copy the behaviour of the system, as opposed to copying the text verbatim." That's right! Distillation enables non-trivial forms of plagiarism [5].
Annotated References (easy to find on the web):
[1] Cade Metz, New York Times (6 July 2026). "American AI companies Say Chinese Copycats are Quickly Catching Up"
[2] O. Vinyals, J. A. Dean, G. E. Hinton (2015). Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network. arXiv:1503.02531. [2] did not cite the 1991 neural network distillation procedure [3].
[3] J. Schmidhuber (JS). Learning complex, extended sequences using the principle of history compression. Neural Computation, 4(2):234-242, 1992. Based on TR FKI-148-91, TUM, 1991.
See Section 4 on the "conscious" chunker and a "subconscious" automatiser which introduced a general principle for transferring the knowledge from one neural net (NN) to another. Suppose a teacher NN has learned to predict (conditional expectations of) data, given other data. Its knowledge can be compressed into a student NN, by training the student NN to imitate the behavior of the teacher NN (while also re-training the student NN on previously learned skills such that it does not forget them). In 1991, I called this "collapsing" or "compressing" one NN into another. Today, this is widely used, and also referred to as "distilling" or "cloning" the behavior of a teacher NN into that of a student NN. It even works when the NNs are recurrent and operate on different time scales.
[4] JS. Who invented knowledge distillation with artificial neural networks? Technical Note IDSIA-12-25, IDSIA, Nov 2025. https://t.co/w0WhIVGXQx
[5] JS. How 3 Turing awardees republished key methods and ideas whose creators they failed to credit. Technical Report IDSIA-23-23, Swiss AI Lab IDSIA, 2023 (updated 2025).
[6] @hardmaru & JS (2026). Munich 1991: the Roots of the Current AI Boom. With a preface by David Ha.
@cosminnegruseri@JFPuget my intuition is that this is because Transformers contain many linear layers with 2D weight matrices. The Muon optimizer is specifically designed to optimize 2D weight matrices, so it's naturally a good fit for Transformer architectures.
@rasbt Wonderful article, as always!
I'd love to learn more about the agent literature. Could you recommend a few good papers to start with, or perhaps share some of your favorite ones?
@NotDrAbeFroman@kimmonismus An average person can get a sub-10 solve if they put in enough time and practice. So I dont believe in his talent but hard work in the field
@DHolzmueller Do you have any plans for the prior as well?
I read the paper and know you were mainly responisble for developing the prior! You might be the best one for ... 😂
@kagglingdieter Agreed! For TFMs/TSFMs, the prior development should be guided by maximizing dataset diversity while encoding useful inductive biases and preserving computational efficiency!
@DHolzmueller Hi, I tried TabICLv2 in a community tabular competition.
Just simply fit the model and predict, your TFM generalizes quite well on both the public and private lb! I’m not concerned about decontamination in this case, looking forward to the upcoming improvements to TabICL 👍
@cis_female Woww this is a great lesson for training NNs! I am having problem with train a neural net on a small and noisy dataset, I'd think sampling a batch strategically might give model more meaningful gradients and better optimization 😂😅