ducovitae

living Gavin's California dream

[Matt Van Swol @mattvanswol]

@ScottPresler LEADER THUNE IS GOING TO DESTROY THE ENTIRE COUNTRY BECAUSE HE IS A WEAK PATHETIC COWARD WHO WILL NOT PASS THE SAVE ACT TO SECURE OUR ELECTIONS!!!!!!

LOOK AT WHAT HAPPENED IN CALIFORNIA!!!!

THEY STOLE AN ELECTION AND THE GOP DO NOT GIVE A SINGLE DAMN!!!!!!!!

[Benny Johnson @bennyjohnson]

On election night, no-name, no support Nithya Raman sobbed & conceded the race

She apologized to her family for failing

This made sense. She polled in the single digits & bombed in the debate. Now a historically insurmountable 3rd place

This was before “the machine” took over

[ThePersistence @ScottPresler]

Why am I so angry with Senate Majority Leader Thune?

He has the power to secure our elections & REFUSES to pass the SAVE America Act!

Now — a week AFTER Election Day — Spencer Pratt is in third place in the Los Angeles mayoral election.

[Miranda Devine @mirandadevine]

I recognize some of these from @MrAndyNgo's Antifa files. Are these stolen from him or legit the same people?

[Reddit Lies @reddit_lies]

You can't fight biology.

[Eagle Ed Martin @EagleEdMartin]

They killed Charlie.
They shot President Trump.
They put hundreds into the DC gulag by lying.
It’s not a battle of ideas - they want us dead.
Know the fight we are in.

[Martin Sellner @MartinSellner_]

The utter hypocrisy of German media.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

These are all common sense!

[Dipper @dipperid]

How the tables have turned.

[ducovitae @ducovitae]

@SecMullinDHS @ICEgov You seem like a weak pussy. Just saying.I already know that if we tried protesting like this against the left, we would all be in jail and facing insane charges. Look at Jan 6. You're not willing to truly hold them accountable, which is why they get away with it.

[Rapid Response 47 @RapidResponse47]

One might wonder why Newscum's team would post something so idiotic, but it makes sense considering they've never actually seen a project completed. It's a foreign concept to them.

[1Donna Sue @D0nnasue1]

@Savsays @MH60_CE

[ducovitae @ducovitae]

@nicksortor Why can't we arrest them all of them? I don't understand. Or just fully run them over and hold them liable for any damage to the car. If you stand in front of a car, that's your fault.I can't believe we put up with this shit.

[JD Vance @JDVance]

Henry Nowak died the same way a civilization dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit. His murder is as tragic as it is enraging. He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.

Henry was far from the first to so needlessly lose his life, and I fear he won’t be the last. Each time a life like his is lost, the proper response—the only response—is righteous anger. One of the most important things the Trump administration has proven to the world is that stopping the flow of mass migration and defending national sovereignty is a matter of political will and leadership. Anything else is an excuse.

It is because we love the West that we want to preserve it. We love our civilization. We love our country. We love our children. And nobody—nobody—should ever die the way that Henry Nowak died. May God comfort those who loved him, and may God rest his soul.

[Konstantin Kisin @KonstantinKisin]

The thing is, it's not just two tier policing. It's two tier everything.

[Lyndsey Fifield @lyndseyfifield]

I bucked all advice from my friends (and resisted my conservative bias) and decided to fully trust the Times journalists.

As they left my home they asked that I not talk to any other outlets and I insisted then and repeatedly over the following weeks that I would keep my word and only share this story with them.

But then the weeks dragged on. They kept coming back to us saying the editors needed more. I needed to go on the record (okay). We need more screenshots (okay). I met every bench mark they set, eager to provide more sources or evidence as needed.

After the story went up I began to ask them … wait, where are the stories from the other women? Where are their accusations of sexual assault? Why am I the focus? Why are there 11 paragraphs dedicated to detailing my work history (more than has been published about Graham’s by far)?

Why does it say “nobody could corroborate” when I offered them sources that COULD corroborate?

Why did they include an out of context quote from a friend joking “do not call Graham” after I called off my wedding? (Because she knew I would never).

Where were the screenshots they’d said they would use? Or the mention that I’d supported local democrats and that most of my family (and husband) are liberal?

The editors said it was too much, they explained.

The Times also failed to include any mention that I DID confide in multiple friends through the years that Graham had been abusive — long before he was running for office. Those friends confirm they told the Times so.

It dawned on me that this really was a set up all along. The journalists I trusted who convinced me to share a story I never wanted to tell methodically delayed and twisted this into a gift to the Platner campaign. Violating the trust of his victims. Shattering the trust I placed in them with the most vulnerable story of my life.

And at the end of my call with them I reluctantly accepted their insistence that this was still a powerful story and that I had done a brave thing. And I thanked them for all the hard work they had put into it.

Still fawning after all these years.

[ducovitae @ducovitae]

@js121822 @Awk20000 @h3h3productions I can't cure stupid though and I really don't care what your opinion is lol so bye bye loser, hope FIFA doesn't refund your poor ass 🤣

[ducovitae @ducovitae]

@js121822 @Awk20000 @h3h3productions "An ad hominem argument (Latin for "to the person") is a logical fallacy in which a speaker attacks their opponent's character, motive, or personal traits rather than engaging with the substance of their actual argument."

[ducovitae @ducovitae]

@js121822 @Awk20000 @h3h3productions I figured it would be a pointless discussion lol okay bro, whatever you say 👍 enjoy your safe space

[ducovitae @ducovitae]

I responded to the text from the post. Did you watch Asmons entire stream? Yeah I doubt it. So are we both dumb or does that requirement only apply to me?

And yeah I heard his response, which was: "I feel like it fits with the story and I don't mind playing a girl character, what's wrong with playing as a girl, that's why Asmon doesn't like it, cause it's a girl character" like wow, that's some good argument, let me analyze that. Obviously his personal feelings = objective truth, so everything checks out! Fuck what Asmon said, Ethan knows what he really meant.

At the end of the day, I still like Ethan and Hila, tho I disagree with a majority of their political views. I know that's a pretty crazy concept these days. I don't mind him criticizing Asmon, but at least attack the actual argument. If you have a good argument, you don't need to straw man and make up shit.